On Thursday 21 April 2011 17:10:04 Shane Powell wrote:
Shane, that's really good, seems to work well. Can you rename this 0.0.9 and
re-post so no-one gets confused. Great work.
Only problem is that with a darkk picture, the black writing in the top right
corner dosn't show up.
Regards
Richard
Gambas-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gambas-user
Magnify-0.0.8-0.0.8.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
--
Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
On Thursday 21 April 2011 04:20:35 Matti wrote:
> Hi Shane and Richard (and whoever, didn't follow the conversation),
>
> this is a nice idea!
>
> After trying it just once with a few images, a question: The lens
> magnifies, but definitely doesn't show the original size of the image. My
> test
Hi Shane and Richard (and whoever, didn't follow the conversation),
this is a nice idea!
After trying it just once with a few images, a question: The lens magnifies, but
definitely doesn't show the original size of the image. My test images are about
3200x2400, and your lens shows about 2/3 of th
On 20/04/11 15:49, richard terry wrote:
On Wednesday 20 April 2011 14:25:03 Shane Powell wrote:
Had a quick play with this, works ok, except when the image is expanded the
mouse-over is no longer accurate.
Have a think about my previous post about the 'hidden image' as the one you
read off for t
On Wednesday 20 April 2011 14:25:03 Shane Powell wrote:
Had a quick play with this, works ok, except when the image is expanded the
mouse-over is no longer accurate.
Have a think about my previous post about the 'hidden image' as the one you
read off for the magnified area. I'll take a look at t
On Wednesday 20 April 2011 14:25:03 Shane Powell wrote:
Thanks, will do in a minute - struggling through patients/paper work.
Another consideration is this.
At the moment the magnification is magnifying from the loaded image which has
been shrunk to fit the drawing area.
One really needs a cop
On 19/04/11 23:55, richard terry wrote:
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 21:21:30 Shane Powell wrote:
Ok, I couldn't resist before I went to bed, I've skipped a number in case you
post 0.0.7 and we get confused. Hope I've sent the correct one, if not re-
post.
This now works like this.
1) You must loa
----------
> --- Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload
> Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top
> priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve
> applica
