.
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:31 PM
Subject: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi all,
Recently I've been strongly considering upgrading all my games to the
.Net Framework 3.0 in order
PM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
I use Windows xp Home, and plan to do so for as long as possible. As long
as it meets my needs, which it currently does, and until Vista's bugs are
worked out to a point at which it is reliable and user friendly to users
of
jaws
are most likely not right, you get the idea, I'm sure. Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:31 PM
Subject: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi all,
Recently I've been strongly
Hi Thomas,
Sorry, I misunderstood you. I thought that you were talking that current
software would not run in Vista and beyond. Definitely agree that every new
version of Windows has needed a much more powerful machine to run it on and
that, that will continue to be true.
BFN
Jim
All
Hi Trouble,
I do disagree with you about me needing to move up with the latest and greatest
or quit. As I said dos programs and windows 3.1 programs still run in windows
xp. My VB6 programs run in windows Vista and I will wager that they will also
run in the next version of windows as well.
Hi Jim,
That was definately not my point. there is allot of older software that
still runs on Windows Vista, but some of them have issues, and you have
to tinker with it to make them run.
Though, there are going to be future issues with VB 6 applications and
earlier just because the fact
@audyssey.org
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 1:55 PM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi Jim,
That was definately not my point. there is allot of older software that
still runs on Windows Vista, but some of them have issues, and you have
to tinker with it to make them
Hi Josh,
I haven't tried this with VB 2005, but I know VB 2003 had a wizard that
would allow you to import a VB 6 project,and it would attempt to convert
it to VB .Net.
In most cases the code was usable, but some of the code like DirectX
would have to be upgraded by hand to fit with DirectX
Developer
ACE Games
http://www.acegamesonline.net
Skype: Tristanbussiere
MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: gitrdone9632
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gamers Discussion list gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2007 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs
Hi Tristan,
First, a correction. Visual Basic .Net and Visual Basic 2005 are the
very same language. We just use the name VB 2005 to distinguish it from
Visual Basic .Net 2003 and Visual Basic 6.
Second, as for the Microsoft .Net Express compilers I have a link to all
of them on my FAQ page
I will never move to the latest and greatest.
There are 2 things.
If you are hard cure you would probably be with the latest and greatest.
Meaning you would chuck away your crappy computer after 3 months
because thats aparently how long it takes for something to be obselete.
The top models and
Hi Thomas,
I don't know about present or past programs not running on Vista etc. I can
still run dos programs in XP as well as programs like Cool Edit from Windows
3.1. Heck even here on the list the old BBS door games and other dos text
adventure games are still very popular. I just don't
The only thing i got to say about this is, Your right not everything
has to be the latest and greatest. however, with the blind getting
computers from orgs and other places. The op on that system is going
to be the latest and greatest. Why because that is what is new and
that is what they get.
Hi Jason,
A version for XP is available on the Microsoft site. Once I port Monty
to .Net 3.0, which seams likely, I'll be posting it to the USA Games
site as well.
jason wrote:
Hello Thomas whre can you get the .network version 3.0 on the microsoft
sight or do you have it on on USA games?
Hi Jim,
I'm a little confused by your post, but I think we are talking about two
differen things here.
First, the .Net Framework 3.0 is not really supported on Windows 2000,
but is well supported on Windows Server 2003, Windows XP, and Vista of
course.
Second, I was merely pointing out in the
Hi Trouble,
Well said. I don't have a problem with anyone having around an old
system to play dos games, and older programs. I have a 98 SE system in
my living room which still acts a gaming machine for older stuff like
Tomb Raider, and some of my older games. I never said that older stuff
is
Hi Michael,
No problem. You may be one of the ones who will benifit from direct
Vista support rahter than me sticking with .Net 2.0, and trying to
support everything from 2K on up to Vista.
Michael Maslo wrote:
Thomas:
I am using vista already
---
Gamers mailing list __
Message -
From: Thomas Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gamers Discussion list gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi Jason,
A version for XP is available on the Microsoft site. Once I port Monty
to .Net 3.0
Hi all,
Recently I've been strongly considering upgrading all my games to the
.Net Framework 3.0 in order to better support windows Vista which others
and I now are using on a daily basis. The plus side of doing this is
that all that will be required is installing or upgrading DirectX to
Aug.
, August 28, 2007 4:31 PM
Subject: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi all,
Recently I've been strongly considering upgrading all my games to the
.Net Framework 3.0 in order to better support windows Vista which others
and I now are using on a daily basis. The plus side of doing
Sadler
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:31 PM
Subject: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi all,
Recently I've been strongly considering upgrading all my games to the
.Net Framework 3.0 in order
@audyssey.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:31 PM
Subject: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi all,
Recently I've been strongly considering upgrading all my games to the
.Net Framework 3.0 in order to better support windows Vista which others
and I now are using on a daily basis
I will be upgrading to Vista via a new pc within the year. probably within
the next 7 months.
Casey
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:31 PM
Subject: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi all
not be created.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thomas Ward
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 3:31 PM
To: gamers@audyssey.org
Subject: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi all,
Recently I've been strongly considering upgrading all my games
list at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Crash
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 2:31 PM
Subject: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi all,
Recently I've been strongly considering upgrading all my games
Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:31 PM
Subject: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi all,
Recently I've been strongly considering upgrading all my games to the
.Net Framework 3.0 in order to better support windows Vista which others
Hi Damien and all,
Let me refraze the Vista question so my question is more clear. I am
trying to figure out how many of you will be upgrading to Vista over the
next year, and not gather data on how many are planning to stick with
XP. XP works fine with .Net 3 and DirectX so no compatibility
Hi Josh,
Just speaking from personal experience if you are getting a new computer
with in the next year it's better to get one preloaded with Vista rather
than upgrade.
The reason is Vista is notorious for having hardware and driver issues
on untested computer systems. The one's you buy that
Hi Ron,
(Smile) I can understand your reasons there. You are right XP SP2 has
been the most stable os Microsoft has released to date. Anything earlier
is not worth your time as far as stability and security goes.
Microsoft has a huge history of releasing buggy operating systems, but
over time
I have no plans to upgrade any system for now.
Everything is stable and if I upgraded I'd have to spend cash on
screenreaders wich I don't have.
At 08:31 a.m. 29/08/2007, you wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I've been strongly considering upgrading all my games to the
.Net Framework 3.0 in order to
yet, maybe a year or so, I've been quite pleased with the performance and
would use nothing developed earlier.
Ron
Audyssey Editor
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:31 PM
Subject: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0
earlier.
Ron
Audyssey Editor
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 4:31 PM
Subject: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi all,
Recently I've been strongly considering upgrading all my games
Hi Casey,
Thanks for your post. This is exactly the kind of info I am searching
for. You are officially number 1 on the possible converts on my future
growth chart.
Casey wrote:
I will be upgrading to Vista via a new pc within the year. probably within
the next 7 months.
---
Gamers
Hi Michael,
I can certainly tell you it has nothing to do with .Net 3.0. Super Liam
was written in Visual Basic 6.0. As you may or may not know Visual Basic
6 applications are not well supported under Win Vista, and Microsoft is
pulling all support in 2008.
Anyway, I don't know the exact cause
Hi Shaun,
Quote
If I upgrade, I will get the best version of vista and pro version.
End quote
Well, let me just say this since I have some inside knolege about Vista
that the public doesn't know. Every Vista dvd that is pressed is
identical except for one or two files that tells the os if it
Hi Shaun,
As I told another lister that is fine. I am merely trying to flush out
those who are certainly planning on a Vista upgrade.
I don't need to know those users who aren't planning on an upgrade do to
cash, hardware, fears of upgrading, bla.
I plan to support XP for a long time, but I want
Thomas:
I am using vista already
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thomas Ward
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 6:54 PM
To: Gamers Discussion list
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi Damien and all,
Let me refraze
Hi Blind Guy,
Well, as I just said to Shaun in my prier post running the BSC games
isn't hopeless under Vista, but a pain in the rear to make them work.
Mostly it requires you opening yourself to security risks by disabling
some of Vista's security features.
blind guy wrote:
wow. i bought 3
Thomas:
I appreciate that so very much.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Thomas Ward
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 8:08 PM
To: Gamers Discussion list
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi Michael,
I can certainly
Hi Gary,
I have considered having two seperate downloads as you mentioned. Click
here to download a version for Windows 2000 or XP. Click here to
download for Vista. However, the only sticker is Windows 2000. there are
.net 3.0 back ports for XP and Windows Server 2003 so there is
absolutely
I'm not upgrading soon to vista. It's not worth the trouble for me yet.
- Original Message -
From: Thomas Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gamers Discussion list gamers@audyssey.org
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2007 3:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi Casey
, 2007 7:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Audyssey] .Net 2.0 vs 3.0 and Vista support.
Hi Damien and all,
Let me refraze the Vista question so my question is more clear. I am
trying to figure out how many of you will be upgrading to Vista over the
next year, and not gather data on how many are planning
42 matches
Mail list logo
