2012/9/14 Bernardo Dal Seno :
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Michael Hanselmann
> wrote:
>> 2012/9/14 Guido Trotter :
>>> I believe we lock or don't lock depending on the RPC type, what it
>>> does, and how compatible it is with other RPCs, right?
>>
>> Recreating disks involves DRBD (or oth
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Michael Hanselmann wrote:
> 2012/9/14 Guido Trotter :
>> I believe we lock or don't lock depending on the RPC type, what it
>> does, and how compatible it is with other RPCs, right?
>
> Recreating disks involves DRBD (or other block device types) and
> unless othe
2012/9/14 Guido Trotter :
> I believe we lock or don't lock depending on the RPC type, what it
> does, and how compatible it is with other RPCs, right?
Recreating disks involves DRBD (or other block device types) and
unless other measures have been taken, locks must be used. You don't
want an inst
I believe we lock or don't lock depending on the RPC type, what it
does, and how compatible it is with other RPCs, right?
Guido
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Michael Hanselmann wrote:
> 2012/9/13 Bernardo Dal Seno :
>> The old primary node was being locked to do RPC, but we don't lock nodes
2012/9/13 Bernardo Dal Seno :
> The old primary node was being locked to do RPC, but we don't lock nodes
> for RPC anymore, so the lock is useless.
We don't lock nodes for RPC? What did I miss?
Michael
LGTM,
Thanks
Guido
On 13 Sep 2012 16:59, "Bernardo Dal Seno" wrote:
> The old primary node was being locked to do RPC, but we don't lock nodes
> for RPC anymore, so the lock is useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernardo Dal Seno
> ---
> lib/cmdlib.py | 16 ++--
> 1 files changed, 6 in
The old primary node was being locked to do RPC, but we don't lock nodes
for RPC anymore, so the lock is useless.
Signed-off-by: Bernardo Dal Seno
---
lib/cmdlib.py | 16 ++--
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/cmdlib.py b/lib/cmdlib.py
index 2e4da4
