Re: [Ganglia-developers] minor rpm spec file improvement.

2002-08-28 Thread matt massie
in the C version of gmetad .. you have /etc/gmetad.conf /usr/sbin/gmetad /var/lib/ganglia/* and that's it. (of course you can change the prefix). i'll make sure that gmetad keep it's paws off of /usr/local/ in the future. :) -matt Today, Leif Nixon wrote forth saying... > "Jason A. Smith"

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gmetad

2002-08-28 Thread Steven Wagner
matt massie wrote: Today, Jason A. Smith wrote forth saying... On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 20:07, matt massie wrote: guys- i just checked in the C code for gmetad into CVS. it's not finished but i should have a working version within a few day. Where is it, I don't see it anywhere in the so

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gmetad

2002-08-28 Thread matt massie
Today, Jason A. Smith wrote forth saying... > On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 20:07, matt massie wrote: > > guys- > > > > i just checked in the C code for gmetad into CVS. it's not finished but i > > should have a working version within a few day. > > Where is it, I don't see it anywhere in the source

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Latest on IRIX

2002-08-28 Thread Steven Wagner
James Braid wrote: I guess it's possible that the intf_* stuff doesn't work well on multi-proc SGIs. Any ideas? No ideas sorry, but I can also confirm this was happening on my IRIX boxes. I never tried it on a uni-proc box (compiling stuff on an Indy really bites) so I just assumed it was

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gmetad

2002-08-28 Thread Jason A. Smith
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 20:07, matt massie wrote: > guys- > > i just checked in the C code for gmetad into CVS. it's not finished but i > should have a working version within a few day. Where is it, I don't see it anywhere in the sourceforge cvs repository: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/v

Re: [Ganglia-developers] minor rpm spec file improvement.

2002-08-28 Thread Leif Nixon
"Jason A. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since I am making suggestions about rpm spec files, could I ask that > future versions of the gmetad package install into /usr instead of > /usr/local. I really don't like it when rpms install files outside of > their standard paths. I second that.