On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 17:12, Adeyemi Adesanya wrote:
> Matt,
>
> I may create a test environment to try out 2.6.0. Solaris is still my #1
> platform for running gmond while gmetad and the web frontend run on Linux. I
> understand that the rrds won't be compatible across the releases. Is an rrd
> m
Matt,
I may create a test environment to try out 2.6.0. Solaris is still my #1
platform for running gmond while gmetad and the web frontend run on Linux. I
understand that the rrds won't be compatible across the releases. Is an rrd
migration script still in the works?
Yemi
On 5/18/04 3:44 P
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 16:48, Brooks Davis wrote:
> > any ideas of how to fix it?
>
> If we're just using a hacked up copy of zlib with new symbols, we should
> probably import a renamed copy of zlib.h that includes a definition of
> Z_RLE do we stop picking up the system one.
i've been doing my
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 04:41:59PM -0700, Matt Massie wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 16:29, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -Wall -c
> > gzio.c -MT gzio.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/gzio.TPlo -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/gzio.lo
> > gzio.c:24: error:
On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 16:29, Brooks Davis wrote:
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/local/include -D_REENTRANT -Wall -c
> gzio.c -MT gzio.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/gzio.TPlo -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/gzio.lo
> gzio.c:24: error: redefinition of `struct internal_state'
> gzio.c: In function `gz_open'
On Tue, May 18, 2004 at 03:44:51PM -0700, Matt Massie wrote:
> i'm concerned about the portability of 2.6.0. i think it's only been
> test on linux and freebsd so far. we have eight or so oses out there
> that use ganglia.
It's worse then that actually. I haven't sucessfully run 2.6 on FreeBSD
yemi-
i'm currently using 2.6.0 to monitor a distributed test bed
(http://www.planet-lab.org/). the monitoring page is at
http://planetlab.millennium.berkeley.edu/
i've found it to be stable however i'm not really using the unicast
feature right now (although i may try it as a test soon).
i wou
I guess this message is directed to Matt Massie since he appears to be the
driving force behind the new 2.6.0 features. I've been reading through Matt's
previous emails describing the features in 2.6.0 and I'm pleased.
The most important change for me is the ability to specify unicast channels.
