here is an email that i was in the process of writing
i just uploaded a new snapshot @ http://matt-massie.com/ganglia/
i think this will solve our 0.0.0.0 problem (mostly).
can you try this out and see how it works for you martin et al?
here is the new problem that i think we'll have on h
Hi Matt,
after seeing your latest CVS checkins, I thought to try them out.
Better, but we are not yet there :-) When doing my telnet test (local
and remote), I now get the following rejects:
server_thread() Host :::127.0.0.1 tried to connect and was refused
server_thread() Host :::160.48
Hi Matt.
I tried "telnet 127.0.0.1 8649" as well as telnet using the actual IP address
of the host and in both cases I get the same result as with a host name (no XML
output).
Yemi
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Massie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004
On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 11:21, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > i have a question though... where you putting in the hostname or IP
> > address? i suspect you were putting in the hostname and when gmond
> > resolved the name it got an IPv6 address. can you try running gmond
> > explicitly stating an IP
I don't have access to a system right now, but he probably wants:
telnet 127.0.0.1 8749 and
telnet 8749
I think I remember trying these, and it failing, but I wouldn't bet
money on it.
- Josh
Josh Durham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Computer Systems Engineer
--- Matt Massie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks for martin's sleuthing i think i understand what might be
> going
> on here.
>
> the getaddrinfo() call was being given an AF_UNSPEC hint which meant
> that either a IPv4 or IPv6 address was acceptable. since the
> machines
> had IPv6 interfaces
thanks for martin's sleuthing i think i understand what might be going
on here.
the getaddrinfo() call was being given an AF_UNSPEC hint which meant
that either a IPv4 or IPv6 address was acceptable. since the machines
had IPv6 interfaces.. getaddrinfo was return the IPv6 interfaces.
that's ok.
Hi Matt,
please have a look at the appended diff. Basically, I have just
changed all "family hints" from AF_UNSPEC to AF_INET (IPv4). After this
change the "0.0.0.0" problem went away. Apparently Solaris ( and
Mac/OS) do IPv6 first if AF_UNSPEC is given in a call to "socket". I
have not checked
