Re: [Ganglia-developers] version number

2005-02-01 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
-- Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is rumored to have mumbled on 1. Februar 2005 22:40:14 Uhr -0800 regarding Re: [Ganglia-developers] version number: my choice would be 2.6.0. The changes that went in are incompatible (metrics, configuration file), but the architecture is still similar

Re: [Ganglia-developers] version number

2005-02-01 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Matt, my choice would be 2.6.0. The changes that went in are incompatible (metrics, configuration file), but the architecture is still similar enough to 2.5.X. Once you go to the embedded webserver stuff it is time for 3.0. Because then you will have to make a CVS branch in order to maintain a

[Ganglia-developers] version number

2005-02-01 Thread Matt Massie
guys- i'd like to have an informal vote. please email whether you think this release should be 2.6.0 or 3.0.0. i think there are good reasons for both and i'm looking for some feedback to tip the balance one way or the other. thanks! -matt

Re: [Ganglia-developers] are we there yet?

2005-02-01 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 05:52:34PM +, Matt Massie wrote: > guys- > > i just created what i think will be the 2.6.0 release at > http://matt-massie.com/ganglia/2.6.0/ I'll beat on it a bit tonight and tomarrow. I really do think bumping the major number was a better idea... > i've also updat

[Ganglia-developers] are we there yet?

2005-02-01 Thread Matt Massie
guys- i just created what i think will be the 2.6.0 release at http://matt-massie.com/ganglia/2.6.0/ i've updated the rpm installation to check if the person is upgrading from the old 2.5.x gmond and if so it issues the following warning. --

Re: [Ganglia-developers] announcement

2005-02-01 Thread Matt Massie
the consensus is that automatic == evil (i actually didn't receive one response in support of automatic conversion). the most likely solution will be that the rpm checks if you are upgrading from 2.5.x and if so will output a message telling you how to convert your configuration file (gmond --

RE: [Ganglia-developers] announcement

2005-02-01 Thread Bernard Li
Hey Matt: Looks good - were you planning on releasing a beta, or the real deal? Also, what have you decided about the RPM issue? What happens if a user has Ganglia 2.5.6 installed with /etc/gmond.conf and decides to do rpm -Uvh? Thanks, Bernard > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PRO

[Ganglia-developers] announcement

2005-02-01 Thread Matt Massie
guys- can you check over this first draft of an announcement and make comments? i've tried to crystalize most of the cool new things that ganglia 3.0.0 can do that 2.5.x couldn't. it important to me to give everyone credit for the work they've done. if you did something and i haven't put you