On 9/14/05, Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> the patch looks fine and applies to current CVS in a dry-run.
That'd be because I just created it from current CVS. :)
> Do we want it in 3.0.2?
Doesn't matter to me - if it doesn't break anything (e.g. applying
other patc
Hi Mike,
the patch looks fine and applies to current CVS in a dry-run. Do we
want it in 3.0.2?
Just one remark. I personally like patches created with "diff -u".
This format makes it easier to see the actual changes. At least in my
opinion. Maybe we should change the documentation.
Cheers
Mart
I believe this is the first time I've hit the filter... =.="
The patch is attached to another message with this subject, since my
anti-spam filter caught the first failure message and I didn't figure
that out until I sent a "revised" message/patch.
Like I said in BZ 61, this is mostly a cosmetic
On 9/14/05, michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because this is my first patch, I wasn't sure if the patch came out
> funny or not. When I first made the patch with the instructions at
I hate making extra noise, but I believe I forgot to clean up the
backup files in my directory, so I end
On Sep 13, 2005, at 11:30 PM, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
Bernard,
as far as I know, I have no special access to the site - with the
exception of CVS.
i just added martin and brooks to the list of project admins. they
shouldn't have any problem accessing any ganglia site resources.
there is
