Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.4 and srclib

2006-09-04 Thread matt massie
Martin Knoblauch wrote: Hi Matt, Folks, you may have seen the commits. I have just moved "libmetrics" out of "scrlib" into top-level. "srclib" is now external-only stuff. Build tested on my FC4 system. I will try HP-UX and Solaris later the week. that's a good idea. makes more sense. talk

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.4 and srclib

2006-09-04 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Hi Matt, Folks, you may have seen the commits. I have just moved "libmetrics" out of "scrlib" into top-level. "srclib" is now external-only stuff. Build tested on my FC4 system. I will try HP-UX and Solaris later the week. Martin --- matt massie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hey guys- > > i

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.4 and srclib

2006-09-04 Thread Richard.Grevis
Fair enough, although I did not realise you were talking about apr. I was talking about autoconf, freetype, libart, rrdtool etc, and all of those are installed in /opt/ganglia. kind regards, Richard > -Original Message- > From: Marcus Rueckert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 Septem

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.4 and srclib

2006-09-04 Thread Marcus Rueckert
First all you go way too far with my approach. On 2006-09-04 15:41:32 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > your envionment certainly sounds like it is under control, > but in mine, the engineered Linux build has packages that in some > instances are really quite old. Old enough for the Ganglia build

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.4 and srclib

2006-09-04 Thread Richard.Grevis
That's what I meant to say too. :-) static, but dynamic for common or garden system libraries... regards, richard > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Martin Knoblauch > Sent: 04 September 2006 15:32 > To: Marcus Rueckert > Cc: gangli

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.4 and srclib

2006-09-04 Thread Richard.Grevis
Markus, your envionment certainly sounds like it is under control, but in mine, the engineered Linux build has packages that in some instances are really quite old. Old enough for the Ganglia build to barf. In some cases a fix would have been easy because the package was not there at all. And bec

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.4 and srclib

2006-09-04 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Hi Marcus, --- Marcus Rueckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2006-09-04 05:29:10 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > why would it be a maintenance nichtmare? All other system > libraries > > are linked shared. It only involves the three foreign packages. > Just > > curious? > > i said statical

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.4 and srclib

2006-09-04 Thread Richard.Grevis
Matt, some comments below. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of matt massie > Sent: 03 September 2006 08:36 > To: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.4 and srclib > > > hey guys- > > i wante

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.4 and srclib

2006-09-04 Thread Marcus Rueckert
On 2006-09-04 05:29:10 -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > why would it be a maintenance nichtmare? All other system libraries > are linked shared. It only involves the three foreign packages. Just > curious? i said statically linked. you said linked shared. :) dynamic linking is of course fine. :)

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.4 and srclib

2006-09-04 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Hi folks, --- Marcus Rueckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2006-09-03 00:36:29 -0700, matt massie wrote: > > i wanted to comment on the who "srclib" library business. there > are two > > separate issues that need to be addressed. > > > > first. > > > > i feel it is critically important that