Hi Richard,
absolutely true. Not being able to specify the size of the complete
rrd image is a big problem.
Cheers
Martin
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Ahh,
>
> my mail crossed with Ian's.
>
> For me, I just put up with the slightly varying image sizes
> in return for no aliasing artifacts.
Hi Richard,
it is definitely a scaling artifact. An I believe that newer versions
of rrdtool may use different fonts than older ones.
As I wrote, removing the explicit geometry settings brings back the
good crendering, but now the images are of different size and this
looks ugly too :-(
So, n
Ahh,
my mail crossed with Ian's.
For me, I just put up with the slightly varying image sizes
in return for no aliasing artifacts. In truth I find most
standard ganglia instances pretty ugly for this reason.
If there is any underlying problem, it is that you can only
tell rrdtool what the size of
Hi,
surely it is the bounding box size being wrong in the IMG part of the
html, e.g.
If the dimensions given above differ from the image itself,
this would cause aliasing/moire artifacts. Personally I got rid of the
explicit setting of image dimensions ages ago. Too much hassle.
If you did not
