On 7/16/2007 at 8:13 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernard Li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brad:
Is /usr/lib/libganglia* needed by the ganglia-gmetad package?
AFAIK it is only needed by gmond?
Thanks,
Bernard
Yes it is, Gmetad uses a lot of the hash_*, err_*, debug_*,
On 7/16/2007 at 7:54 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernard Li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brad:
On 7/16/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Slurpfile is probably doing the right thing by reporting that the file
doesn't exist when it goes to read it (however it should probably
Hi Brad:
Is this something new in trunk? I mean traditionally those files are
part of the ganglia-devel pacakge and aren't needed by normal users
unless they need to compile code against Ganglia.
The issue right now is that both ganglia-gmond and ganglia-gmetad
packages provide the same
Yes and no. Both gmond and gmeta have always depended on the functionality
that is provided by libganglia. The difference is that before libganglia was
being statically linked into both gmond and gmetad. Now that libganglia is
dynamically linked, it needs to be delivered with both RPMs.
Right. ganglia-gmond should not be including any files in the lib/ganglia
directory.
Brad
On 7/17/2007 at 12:14 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernard Li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about these files:
/usr/lib/ganglia/modexample.a
/usr/lib/ganglia/modexample.la
On 7/17/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. ganglia-gmond should not be including any files in the lib/ganglia
directory.
You meant ganglia-gmetad should not be including any files in
lib/ganglia, right?
Cheers,
Bernard
On 7/17/2007 at 12:33 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernard Li
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/17/07, Brad Nicholes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right. ganglia-gmond should not be including any files in the lib/ganglia
directory.
You meant ganglia-gmetad should not be including any files
