Only speaking for what is happening on OSX.
The original issue (before the patches):
After reading all the data from the for(;;) loop, we would read a
SYS_CALL buffer, determine that POLLUP was set and throw out the
entire message when we set d->dead=1 and did a "goto take_a_break;
Thus we wh
>>> On 9/17/2007 at 9:23 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Mike Walker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bernard,
> No go. This doesn't have the patch that I sent to work the OSX
> issues in gmetad. It does have the suggestion by Brad, of putting
> an if statement in the read loop to tes
On Wednesday 12 September 2007 18:58:47 Bernard Li wrote:
> On 9/12/07, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I suspect very few people will have metrics with a "%" in the name;
[...]
> >
> > Actually I would suggest the other way around. The 3.0.5 branch is the
> > stable branch and if t