Hi Carlo:
On 11/5/07, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That should allow them to define memory/disk/bandwith in bits, bytes, KB, MB,
> GB or whatever granularity fits them better.
I believe it Matthew Chambers and I discussed this on IRC once and we
sort of concluded that
>>> On 11/5/2007 at 9:52 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Alex Dean
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been following the discussion about moving all metrics to Python
> modules, and ceasing to use gmetric for custom metrics.
>
> I'm curious about what these metric modules will look like, and h
I've been following the discussion about moving all metrics to Python
modules, and ceasing to use gmetric for custom metrics.
I'm curious about what these metric modules will look like, and how
gmond will expect them to be structured. (If that's been decided yet.)
Are there any examples of a
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 04:29:21PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> -* Remove the 4T limit on ganglia metric results
> -* Modify all byte count metric to 8 bytes ints
moving to 8 byte ints won't solve the problem, will only push it further and
will make the memory utilization for gmond and disk utili
