Attached is a bunch of variable sanitation checking. It isn't done,
but I wanted to throw it out for comments before I go too far down
some hole and can't dig myself out.
This is not a patch, since are only two "include_once" lines (in
index.php and graph.php) for existing files. The rest of the
Hi Alex:
On 2/12/08, Alex Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 1) (now 0.00)
> >> 2) "Show Hosts" toggle stopped working
> >
> > Both look fixed.
> >
>
> Yep, works for me.
Please feel free to submit a patch if you want to further sanitize the
$_GET["sh"] variable...
Thanks,
Bernard
-
Jesse Becker wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 7:57 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Guys:
>>
>> I plan to check-in the following patch and release 3.0.7:
>
>> -GANGLIA_RELEASE_NAME="Foss"
>> +GANGLIA_RELEASE_NAME="Fossett"
>
> Nice touch.
>
>> The following issues are fixed:
>>
>> 1) (now 0.
On Feb 12, 2008 7:57 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guys:
>
> I plan to check-in the following patch and release 3.0.7:
> -GANGLIA_RELEASE_NAME="Foss"
> +GANGLIA_RELEASE_NAME="Fossett"
Nice touch.
> The following issues are fixed:
>
> 1) (now 0.00)
> 2) "Show Hosts" toggle stopped w
On Feb 12, 2008 7:06 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some times I get graphs such as the attached one. The top and bottom
> labels are overlapping -- any ideas why?
>
> (This graph was generated by the code in trunk)
I think that's from rrdtool. What version are you using? Do you ha
Guys:
I plan to check-in the following patch and release 3.0.7:
Index: configure.in
===
--- configure.in(revision 907)
+++ configure.in(working copy)
@@ -38,10 +38,10 @@
# increment GANGLIA_MAJOR_VERSION and set
# G
Hi Brad:
On 2/12/08, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This seems to be working much better now. I can see where a "hide/restore"
> button for each group could really make this much more useful. How hard
> would it be to put a small +/- button or dropdown arrow on each group that
>
Hi Vaibhav:
On 2/8/08, Kumar Vaibhav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tried it on Scientific linux 5.0 (a clone of RHEL 5.0). I see
> similar problem in Scientific linux 4.1 ( clone of RHEL 4 update 1).
I'm running gmond on CentOS 4.x and didn't have any issues.
> I had a subscription to gan
Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 04:17:07PM +0530, Kumar Vaibhav wrote:
>> I am using ganglia-3.0.5 on a woodcrest processor cluster. and I see
>> that after running for weeks the memory consumption of the gmond process
>> is something about 400 MB.
>
> did you check w
Bernard Li wrote:
> Hi Vaibhav:
>
> On 1/22/08, Kumar Vaibhav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I am using ganglia-3.0.5 on a woodcrest processor cluster. and I see
>> that after running for weeks the memory consumption of the gmond process
>> is something about 400 MB. I tried to debug the problem
>>> On 2/11/2008 at 3:59 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brad:
>
> This is on a system running the latest gmond trunk:
>
> 24845 ?Ssl1:45 /usr/sbin/gmond
> 19447 ?Z 0:00 \_ [netstat]
>
> Looks like it's still not fixed...
>>> On 2/12/2008 at 12:04 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Ulf
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just look at the latest snapshot and what I see are some new requirements.
> At least libconfuse, which isn' t even avaible on a SLES distribution.
>
http://software.opensuse.org/search?basep
Hi Ulf:
On 2/12/08, Ulf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just look at the latest snapshot and what I see are some new requirements.
> At least libconfuse, which isn' t even avaible on a SLES distribution.
Requirement to build, yes, but not to use.
BTW, if libconfuse is not available from SLES, yo
Hi,
I just look at the latest snapshot and what I see are some new requirements.
At least libconfuse, which isn' t even avaible on a SLES distribution.
But I' m in doubt that the new gmond will run/compile on AIX and Solaris?
Tested by someone?
What is about the gmond compatibility between 3.0.x
>>> On 2/11/2008 at 6:50 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brad:
>
> On 2/11/08, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I get a no_group group but I only see at most, one graph in that grouping.
> The error that is showing up in the apache e
Hi,
again a small update.
Probably this is the correct calculation?
Usage of RRA from the rrdtool homepage
RRA:AVERAGE | MIN | MAX | LAST:xff:steps:rows
Default polling interval (gmetad.conf): 15s=0.25 minutes => RRA stepping
This should be the result: 6 minute average for 24.4 hours (used 24 in
On Feb 12, 2008 11:43 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > In the meantime, I started on a patch to put all of the variable
> > checks and sanitation in one place.
>
> Do you mean move the checks out of get_context.php and graph.php?
Yes, pretty much all
Quoting Jesse Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Feb 11, 2008 6:46 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Alex:
>> BTW, I am going to check in the patches for trunk, however, I will
>> rename clean_float() to clean_number() since the function name and the
>> comment seems a bit misleading b
On Feb 11, 2008 6:46 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Alex:
> BTW, I am going to check in the patches for trunk, however, I will
> rename clean_float() to clean_number() since the function name and the
> comment seems a bit misleading based on its call to is_numeric (i.e.
> it is not
Hi,
after some tries, I got the calculation behind the RRAs
1 hour=1
1 day=24 hours
1 week=168 hours
1 month=672 hours
default stepping = 15 seconds
RRA #1: RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:1:244: 15 second average for 61 minutes=((1 * 3600) /
15) + 4
RRA #2: RRA:AVERAGE:0.5:24:244: 6 minute average for 24.4 hou
20 matches
Mail list logo
