On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please go ahead and file bugs under gmetad for now -- when the new
> component is created I'll let you know.
The new component is now available in bugzilla.
Cheers,
Bernard
Hi guys:
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:45 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and as suggested when the branch was created (more than a month ago) here :
>
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net/msg04050.html
>
> also add a version for HEAD
Hi Kuba:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:56 PM, Kuba Konczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to add python gmetad component tag in bug tracker?
Please go ahead and file bugs under gmetad for now -- when the new
component is created I'll let you know.
Thanks,
Bernard
---
Hi,
Is it possible to add python gmetad component tag in bug tracker?
Thanks,
jkk
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070
Hi Erich:
Do you currently have any plans to release new versions of gexec,
gexec-authd, and libe? I am asking you since you are probably the
last person (along with Babu) to touch the code and there currently
isn't a released version that is compatible with Ganglia 3.0.x, I just
thought maybe we
The patch looks reasonable and straight forward to me. I'm not sure why
tmax was hardcoded to 20 but I don't see a problem with allowing it to be
configurable. In order to make sure that patches like this don't get lost in
future versions, can you rework it against the trunk code rather tha
>>> On 5/30/2008 at 2:55 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 06:22:09PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> > The following pro
Hi all,
First of all, my apologies if this list is not appropriate for this
mail, and thanks to all ganglia developers for the great work.
I encountered the following problem:
We need to monitor thousands of hosts. Each rack of 32 machines
reports to one gmond in the rack. After that, onl
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 06:22:09PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 4:15 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The following proposed patch for stable 3.1, completes the fix for BUG36
> > committed in r1244 to display correctly the time since the las
