On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 04:05:49PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> After this is checked in I will tag/create RC1 tarball.
instead of a release candidate, a beta should be prepared.
a beta (a stable version which will show all features as planned to be
released) should be released, so that it can be
>>> On 6/18/2008 at 2:27 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brad:
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I tried this on SuSE x86_64 and it all seemed to work as expected.
>
> After you run ./configure (no
>>> On 6/18/2008 at 2:27 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Brad:
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I tried this on SuSE x86_64 and it all seemed to work as expected.
>
> After you run ./configure (no
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:49:36PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> Hi Stu:
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Stu Teasdale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yes, debian amd64, is 64 bit clean through-out, so /lib64 is just a
> > symlink to /lib and /usr/lib64 is similarly just a link to /usr/lib.
>
- Original Message
> From: Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net; Gilad Raphaelli <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 12:20:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Stacked Graphs
>
> >>> On 6/17/2008 at 4:24 PM, in messag
Hi Stu:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Stu Teasdale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, debian amd64, is 64 bit clean through-out, so /lib64 is just a
> symlink to /lib and /usr/lib64 is similarly just a link to /usr/lib.
If it's just a symlink, then I guess it won't cause any issues if I
were t
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 02:24:27PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> Cc:ing Stu on this one:
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Thanks. I am trying to see if autoconf is doing something different
> > on SuSE. I'd like to avoid hardcoding what libdir is bas
Cc:ing Stu on this one:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks. I am trying to see if autoconf is doing something different
> on SuSE. I'd like to avoid hardcoding what libdir is based on the
> arch unless it is absolutely necessary. I also need to figu
Hi Jarod:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 1:51 PM, Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On my end, ./configure w/o flags on an x86_64 box resulted in a Makefile
> with 'libdir=/usr/lib' and multicpu.conf with 'path
> = "/usr/lib/ganglia/modmulticpu.so"'.
Thanks. I am trying to see if autoconf is d
On Wednesday 18 June 2008 04:27:46 pm Bernard Li wrote:
> Hi Brad:
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tried this on SuSE x86_64 and it all seemed to work as expected.
>
> After you run ./configure (no flags), can you please check
> 'gmond/modules/con
Hi Brad:
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried this on SuSE x86_64 and it all seemed to work as expected.
After you run ./configure (no flags), can you please check
'gmond/modules/conf.d/multicpu.conf' in your build directory to see if
it is using th
>>> On 6/18/2008 at 1:02 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 04:10:26PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>>
>> You have my +1
>
> Committed revision 1425
>
>> but then I don't run AIX.
>
> neither do I, which I guess ma
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 04:10:26PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>
> You have my +1
Committed revision 1425
> but then I don't run AIX.
neither do I, which I guess makes all this reviewing process a moot point.
> Is there anybody else that can review the patch. I am assuming that Ulf
> would
On Wednesday 18 June 2008 11:50:30 am Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >>> On 6/17/2008 at 5:05 PM, in message
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi all:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> I'd agree that this one isn't
>>> On 6/17/2008 at 5:05 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Bernard Li"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Jarod Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> I'd agree that this one isn't a huge deal. Things end up where they're
>>> supposed to, its just not d
>>> On 6/17/2008 at 4:24 PM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gilad Raphaelli
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I submitted the code for the stacked graphs item from the ganglia 3.1
> wishlist in http://bugzilla.ganglia.info/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187
> (in April). It was reviewed by someone
16 matches
Mail list logo
