On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 10:42:06AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> -1
>
> I agree with Brad on this.
Not sure what to make of no one replying to the code on this thread, after
all this is a developer mailing list and I would expect all debate to be
made in a technical basis.
> So C++ support is incom
Hi Brad:
On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 11:01 AM, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With this new rewrite in python, we now have the ability to plug in new
> metric storage modules to support other type of storage mechanisms other than
> RRD and also the ability to plug in any type of analy
-1
I agree with Brad on this.
So C++ support is incomplete, we should document this and keep going.
Regards,
Bernard
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Brad Nicholes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 7/2/2008 at 5:22 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
> Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTEC
>>> On 7/3/2008 at 10:20 AM, in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > > Should a single module handle all architectures, or
>> should there be
>> > > a different module for each architecture? Also, does gmond have
>> > > some way
>> >
>> > Ideally a single module s
>>> On 7/2/2008 at 5:22 PM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following proposed patch for stable 3.1, removes all references to C/C++
> as a supported language for building DSO metrics as it was meaningless and
> only relevant when used wit
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 05:16:15PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I forgot to mention that /usr/local is already in LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and I
> had already tried manually including -L/usr/local/lib in my LDFLAGS
>
> Libintl.so would not be found at all if the linker wasn't looking in
> /usr/local/
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 05:04:59PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Now that I've got 3.1 running on Linux, I decided to try it on Solaris 8
>
> I ran the bootstrap script again, and then tried to run
>
> ./configure --prefix=/usr/local
>
> It doesn't succeed:
>
> Checking for confuse
> ch