Re: [Ganglia-developers] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Ganglia 3.1.0 tarball ready fortesting...

2008-07-16 Thread Bernard Li
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of the reasons why doing gmetad/frontend first might be better is that > since 3.0 the way external metrics (the ones generated with gmetric) is > managed in the frontend has changed. > > If you have gmetr

[Ganglia-developers] Ganglia web patches.

2008-07-16 Thread Jason A. Smith
A while ago I submitted some patches to bugzilla that we use in our ganglia, but some have not been added to the main distribution. Do others find these useful? If so could they be added? I also have a few new/updated patches. Sorry, but they are against the old 3.0.7 stable version, not the ne

[Ganglia-developers] SF.net subversion migration downtime

2008-07-16 Thread Bernard Li
FYI: http://sourceforge.net/community/forum/topic.php?id=2836&page&replies=1 Cheers, Bernard - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Mob

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [ANNOUNCEMENT] Ganglia 3.1.0 tarball ready fortesting...

2008-07-16 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 09:39:48PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Carlo's email from 9 July suggested the opposite - upgrade gmetad first, > the new gmetad would then be able to receive XML from both 3.0 and 3.1 > gmond instances. > > Could someone confirm which (or possibly both) case is recom