Hi Daniel:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Or maybe someone can suggest a clever way to handle existing installs?
> However it is done, it would involve scanning all the cluster
> directories, I'm not sure I would want gmetad to do that every time it
> starts.
You can mak
>>> On 7/16/2009 at 9:30 AM, in message <4a5f47a1.3020...@pocock.com.au>, Daniel
Pocock wrote:
> Brad Nicholes wrote:
> On 7/16/2009 at 9:10 AM, in message <4a5f42d8.9060...@pocock.com.au>,
> Daniel
>
>> Pocock wrote:
>>
>>> Brad Nicholes wrote:
>>>
>>> On 7/16/2
Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 7/16/2009 at 9:10 AM, in message <4a5f42d8.9060...@pocock.com.au>,
Daniel
> Pocock wrote:
>
>> Brad Nicholes wrote:
>>
>> On 7/16/2009 at 8:07 AM, in message <4a5f3430.20...@pocock.com.au>,
>> Daniel
>>
>>
>>> On 7/16/2009 at 9:10 AM, in message <4a5f42d8.9060...@pocock.com.au>, Daniel
Pocock wrote:
> Brad Nicholes wrote:
> On 7/16/2009 at 8:07 AM, in message <4a5f3430.20...@pocock.com.au>, Daniel
>
>> Pocock wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I tried to attach this solution to the bug report, bu
Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 7/16/2009 at 8:07 AM, in message <4a5f3430.20...@pocock.com.au>, Daniel
> Pocock wrote:
>
>
>> I tried to attach this solution to the bug report, but I get this error:
>>
>> You did not enter a valid attachment number.
>>
>>
>> Anyhow, this is a soluti
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:48, Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 7/16/2009 at 8:07 AM, in message <4a5f3430.20...@pocock.com.au>, Daniel
> Pocock wrote:
>
>>
>> I tried to attach this solution to the bug report, but I get this error:
>>
>> You did not enter a valid attachment number.
>>
>>
>> Anyhow, t
>>> On 7/16/2009 at 8:07 AM, in message <4a5f3430.20...@pocock.com.au>, Daniel
Pocock wrote:
>
> I tried to attach this solution to the bug report, but I get this error:
>
> You did not enter a valid attachment number.
>
>
> Anyhow, this is a solution for bug 232:
>
> http://bugzilla.ganglia
I tried to attach this solution to the bug report, but I get this error:
You did not enter a valid attachment number.
Anyhow, this is a solution for bug 232:
http://bugzilla.ganglia.info/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232
As a consequence of applying this patch:
- whenever an RRD is creat