On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 01:21:20PM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>> it replaces apr_proc_detach with an inline implementation of it on plain
>> POSIX and that should be most likely as portable (at least for the platforms
>> we care of) and doesn't intentionally include any error checking to make it
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 09:40:53AM -0800, Bernard Li wrote:
>
> Wow... what a long thread...
Sorry about that boss, but also sent an "executive" summary in :
http://www.mail-archive.com/ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net/msg05398.html
Hope you don't mind reading instead that one or my
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 01:31:22PM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 04:56:51PM +, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote:
>
> > I presume the reason why you haven't seen this show up in the APR list, is
> > because it makes probably more sense for the apache httpd list instead fo
[Resend with correct sender address]
From: Brooks Davis
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:31:22 -0600
To: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
Cc: Brad Nicholes ,
ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] [RFC] two step gmond initialization
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 04:56:5
[Resend to list with right from address]
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 10:00:04AM -0800, Bernard Li wrote:
> Hi Daniel:
>
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
> > I've just posted the issue on d...@apr.apache.org
>
> Thanks!
>
> Here's the post for others who would like to moni
Hi Daniel:
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 5:59 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> I've just posted the issue on d...@apr.apache.org
Thanks!
Here's the post for others who would like to monitor the thread for activity:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/apr-dev/200912.mbox/%3c4b23a058.1000...@pocock.co
Bernard Li wrote:
> Hi guys:
>
> Wow... what a long thread...
>
> IMHO, the best solution here is to look at apache's main loop
> implementation and adapt our code. This way, (hopefully) we will get
> what we want (late initialization) without modifying any apr code.
> Carlo, since you seem to be
