Re: [Ganglia-developers] First prerelease of ganglia-3.0.3 ready for testing

2006-02-23 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
under Mac OS X 10.4.5. -- Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Flachbau), Zi. 18, Robert-Koch-Str. 10 Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - Tel. +49-221-478-5587 pgpmKnSFtxAO2.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Ganglia-developers] New ganglia-3.0.2 snapshot

2005-11-07 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
If no serious regressions show up, this could be 3.0.2. seems to compile and run fine under Mac OS X 10.4.3. Cheers, Sebastian Hagedorn -- Sebastian Hagedorn - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18 Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK Universität zu Köln / Cologne University

Re: [Ganglia-developers] are we there yet?

2005-02-02 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
ecursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 I have autoheader 2.59 installed via Fink in /sw/bin in my $PATH. I don't immediately see what the problem is. That step shouldn't even be necessary, should it? Thanks, Sebastian -- Sebastian Hagedorn M.A. - R

Re: [Ganglia-developers] version number

2005-02-01 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
imilar enough to 2.5.X. I agree. Cheers, Sebastian -- Sebastian Hagedorn M.A. - RZKR-R1 (Flachbau), Zi. 18, Robert-Koch-Str. 10 Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - Tel. +49-221-478-5587 pgp39x71TSeiq.pgp Descriptio

Re: [Ganglia-developers] new snapshot that converts old configuration

2005-01-29 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
(those were in a large static internal matrix). if you added a collection_group to the end of your new configuration, gmond will run. Thanks, that did it! Cheers, Sebastian -- Sebastian Hagedorn M.A. - RZKR-R1 (Flachbau), Zi. 18, Robert-Koch-Str. 10 Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Univers

Re: [Ganglia-developers] new snapshot that converts old configuration

2005-01-29 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
to export xml on xml_port */ tcp_accept_channel { port = "8649" } When I run gmond under Mac OS X 10.3.7 (Darwin 7.7), nothing much seems to happen: /usr/local/sbin/gmond -c gmond.conf -d 5 udp_recv_channel mcast_join=239.2.11.71 mcast_if=en0 port=8653 bind=239.2.11.71 tcp_accept_channel

Re: [Ganglia-developers] feature complete 2.6.0. snapshot

2005-01-25 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
nder Darwin 7.7.0. Gruß, Sebastian Hagedorn -- Sebastian Hagedorn M.A. - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18 Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK Universität zu Köln / Cologne University - Tel. +49-221-478-5587 pgpjHkW4Xy76F.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Ganglia-developers] new snapshot with new improved gmetric

2005-01-24 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
command failed make[2]: *** [libganglia.la] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 Cheers, Sebastian Hagedorn -- Sebastian Hagedorn M.A. - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18 Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZK Universität zu Köln / Cologne Universi

Re: [Ganglia-developers] ganglia 2.6.0.

2004-12-08 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
(__DATA,__common) make[3]: *** [gmond] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 Cheers, Sebastian Hagedorn -- Sebastian Hagedorn M.A. - RZKR-R1 (Gebäude 52), Zimmer 18 Zentrum für angewandte Informatik - Universitätsweiter Service RRZ

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [PATCH] More metrics for Darwin

2004-11-25 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
ually I've thought about it and it makes sense to me: the samples aren't taken simultaneously, so it's not surprising that they don't add up. Wouldn't it be better to have one routine get called for all the cpu samples? Greetings, Sebastian -- Sebastian Hagedorn M.A. - RZKR

[Ganglia-developers] [PATCH] More metrics for Darwin

2004-11-24 Thread Sebastian Hagedorn
t sure whether to attach it or to send it inline. I hope attaching is OK. I've created a patch against 2.5.7 that adds several metrics for Darwin. This isn't tested very much and it seems as though the total of the CPU values is more than 100%, but in general this should be OK. Cheers,