On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:30:24PM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> On 2008-08-11 14:12:34 -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Martin Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I don't think its necessary (or good form) to include a full version
> > > number in the RPM pac
Hi Carlo:
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 2:50 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> who is Marcus and where are his comments?
It appears that Marcus replied using an email address that wasn't
subscribed to the list -- I just let the mails through so you should
be able to see his c
On 2008-08-11 14:12:34 -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Martin Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't think its necessary (or good form) to include a full version
> > number in the RPM package name. RPM already does versioning based on
> > %version.
> >
> >
> >
On 2008-08-12 14:41:29 +0100, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:38:15AM -0500, Martin Hicks wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:30:24PM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > >
> > > this is not the package version. it is the soname mangled a bit. the
> > > base idea behind
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 02:12:34PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Martin Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I don't think its necessary (or good form) to include a full version
> > number in the RPM package name. RPM already does versioning based on
> > %version.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:41:29PM +0100, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:38:15AM -0500, Martin Hicks wrote:
>
> The common practice in the rpm world is to not to use the soname for the
> latest version and have something like compat-ganglia-30 or libganglia30
> for example for
Kostas Georgiou wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:38:15AM -0500, Martin Hicks wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:30:24PM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
>>> this is not the package version. it is the soname mangled a bit. the
>>> base idea behind it is, that you can install multiple version of
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 02:41:29PM +0100, Kostas Georgiou wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:38:15AM -0500, Martin Hicks wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:30:24PM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> > >
> > > this is not the package version. it is the soname mangled a bit. the
> > > base
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 07:38:15AM -0500, Martin Hicks wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:30:24PM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> >
> > this is not the package version. it is the soname mangled a bit. the
> > base idea behind it is, that you can install multiple version of the
> > same librar
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 11:30:24PM +0200, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
>
> this is not the package version. it is the soname mangled a bit. the
> base idea behind it is, that you can install multiple version of the
> same library in parallel.
Okay. I guess I just don't see this very often. Are we ex
Sorry for the spam, but I was one of those guys who got hit by the
GMail downtime :-)
Cheers,
Bernard
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Martin:
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Martin Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I don't think its necessary
Hi Martin:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Martin Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think its necessary (or good form) to include a full version
> number in the RPM package name. RPM already does versioning based on
> %version.
>
>
> Index: monitor-core/ganglia.spec.in
> ==
Hi Martin:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Martin Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think its necessary (or good form) to include a full version
> number in the RPM package name. RPM already does versioning based on
> %version.
>
>
> Index: monitor-core/ganglia.spec.in
> ==
Hi Martin:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Martin Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think its necessary (or good form) to include a full version
> number in the RPM package name. RPM already does versioning based on
> %version.
>
>
> Index: monitor-core/ganglia.spec.in
> ==
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:09:42AM -0500, Martin Hicks wrote:
>
> I don't think its necessary (or good form) to include a full version
> number in the RPM package name. RPM already does versioning based on
> %version.
a little hasty. This has been build tested.
Index: monitor-core/ganglia.sp
I don't think its necessary (or good form) to include a full version
number in the RPM package name. RPM already does versioning based on
%version.
Index: monitor-core/ganglia.spec.in
===
--- monitor-core/ganglia.spec.in(re
16 matches
Mail list logo
