Hi Michael:
Just wondering if you had a chance to work on this...
Thanks!
Bernard
On 4/6/07, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Michael:
Just updated ganglia.spec.in -- if you can please send me a patch
against it, that would be great!
Thanks,
Bernard
On 4/4/07, Bernard Li <[EMAIL P
Hi Michael:
Just updated ganglia.spec.in -- if you can please send me a patch
against it, that would be great!
Thanks,
Bernard
On 4/4/07, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Michael:
Just a heads up -- hopefully I'll check in Marcus' patch for
ganglia.spec.in tonight -- you might want t
Hi Michael:
Just a heads up -- hopefully I'll check in Marcus' patch for
ganglia.spec.in tonight -- you might want to wait for that otherwise
you may potentially get conflicts for your patch.
Thanks,
Bernard
On 4/3/07, Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Great, once you have a patch, I will
Great, once you have a patch, I will review it and check it into the
repo... hopefully along with Marcus' patches which has been sitting
in bugzilla for a while...
Cheers,
Bernard
On 4/3/07, Michael Perzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bernard,
you are right with ppc and ppc64 for Linux on Po
Hi Martin,
I will take a closer look on how to "consolidate" and "combine" function
calls for retrieving metrics as much as possible. This might take a
little bit but Easter vacation is coming up... :-)
Regards,
Michael
Martin Knoblauch wrote:
Hi Michael,
I guess the POWER5 extensions wou
Hi Bernard,
you are right with ppc and ppc64 for Linux on PowerPC. Therefore, I am
currently experiencing with "%ifos aix" etc. and I will let you know if
this works better.
I will also add an entry to %changelog as well as provide you with the
context diff as requested in your other email o
Hi Andreas,
actually, my implementation of the additional POWER5 metrics for AIX and
Linux on POWER is fully compatible to the existing Ganglia metrics. All
POWER5 specific metrics are additional but require some changes to
protocol.x (and some other files) in order to make Ganglia aware of th
Hi Michael,
I guess the POWER5 extensions would be good candidates for dynamic
loading into the gmond stream. In any case, I see no reason not to keep
them in the core code, even if they are not enabled by default.
One thing that I like more with the current code are the "combined"
functions fo
Hi Michael, hi Martin,
since Michaels version is the more complete and more modern Version of
the AIX metrics, i would agree.
Maybe we even could find a way to integrate the partitioning stuff
(Michael called it Power5 stuff) into Ganglia. Maybe the code could be
optional, so the user can decide
Hi Michael:
Quick comment -- you used "%ifarch ppc" to specify operations for AIX,
however, doesn't Linux also support ppc? I know that for the newer
PowerPC the arch is ppc64, not sure about the older ones though.
P.S. Please also add an entry for %changelog.
Thanks,
Bernard
On 4/2/07, Mich
Hi Michael:
Can you actually send it as a diff from SVN? Either send me the
output of 'svn diff' or 'diff -ru .
This will make it easier for me to tell the difference.
Thanks,
Bernard
On 4/2/07, Michael Perzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bernard,
ok, here you go the SPEC file as atta
Hi Bernard,
ok, here you go the SPEC file as attachment.
Some remarks still:
a) Lines #39-#41 I couldn't get RPM v3.0.5 on AIX get to understand that
"%if" directive, also when I googled I think that the "%if" statement is
not supported with RPM v.3.05, so I commented those 3 lines for th
Hi Michael:
Filing a bug and attaching the patch would be nice. Or you could just
post it here.
Thanks,
Bernard
On 4/2/07, Michael Perzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bernard,
I now have a consolidated SPEC file (I think it is ugly :-) ), so how do
you want me to send it to you (I guess not
Hi Bernard,
I now have a consolidated SPEC file (I think it is ugly :-) ), so how do
you want me to send it to you (I guess not posting to the mailing list
:-) ) ?
Regards,
Michael
Bernard Li wrote:
Hi Michael:
Thanks for looking into this. Yes, I am aware the spec file may get
bloated bu
Hi Michael:
Thanks for looking into this. Yes, I am aware the spec file may get
bloated but I think ultimately this will be better for one (or more
person) to manage (as opposed to managing multiple files).
What do other devs/users think?
BTW, I'm cc: Marcus to see if he has any specific insig
Hi Bernard,
I took a closer look and though I think it could be done it might be
very ugly for the following reasons:
- AIX is still using RPM version 3.0.5 and I am not aware of any
intentions to upgrade anytime soon
- Like I said I think it could be consolidated, however, that would
probab
Hi Michael:
Any chance you can also work on merging the ganglia.aix.spec file back
to the mainstream .spec file? I'm about to change configure.in to
only include the specific spec file depending on the OS, but I think
the better solution is just to merge the two. Right now I cannot just
generat
Hi Martin,
if possible I would like to somehow take my version (after some
reviewing) :-), as it contains all the new POWER5 stuff already.
My understanding is - as it would require some changes to protocol.x -
that my changes won't have a chance to get into the core Ganglia source
code
Michael, Andreas,
any chance that you could consolidate the two versions of the AIX
metrics that seem to be around? Seem you are the ones who have worked
most recently on the AIX implementation.
Cheers
Martin
--- Michael Perzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andreas,
>
> thank you for taking the
19 matches
Mail list logo
