--- "Adesanya, Adeyemi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Martin,
>
> Today I learned that the difference in metric values is between a
> gmond "collector" and "deaf" gmonds not gmetric as I stated earlier.
> The trouble may be due to the fact that I am running a lots of
> different gmond version
ep things consistent!
Yemi
> -Original Message-
> From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 12:43 AM
> To: Adesanya, Adeyemi; 'ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net'
> Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] Adding cpu_w
--- "Adesanya, Adeyemi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Martin.
>
> Thanks for the patch. It may be relevant but I have made a
> significant discovery: My XML output from gmetad differs from my XML
> output for gmond in the case of cpu_wio. Gmond (solaris) gives me a
> sensible value (between 0
urceforge.net
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Adding cpu_wio to universal metrics
>
>
> --- Adeyemi Adesanya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/27/04 8:03 AM, "Martin Knoblauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > If cp
--- Adeyemi Adesanya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/27/04 8:03 AM, "Martin Knoblauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> If cpu_wio is a percentage does anyone know why some of my Solaris
> hosts
> report a value far exceeding 100? (Ganglia 2.5.5).
>
>
> Yemi
>
Hi Yemi,
could you
--- Adeyemi Adesanya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/27/04 8:03 AM, "Martin Knoblauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> If cpu_wio is a percentage does anyone know why some of my Solaris
> hosts
> report a value far exceeding 100? (Ganglia 2.5.5).
>
>
> Yemi
>
Hi Yemi,
"interest
On 5/27/04 8:03 AM, "Martin Knoblauch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi.
If cpu_wio is a percentage does anyone know why some of my Solaris hosts
report a value far exceeding 100? (Ganglia 2.5.5).
Yemi
> Hi,
>
> after receiving overwhelming feedback on my request for discussing the
> additio
Martin,
I like you idea and think you did the right thing. Brooks, if you want
to indicate "always zero" set the slope of the metric to "zero". The
webfrontend will interpret that correctly.
Martin, let me know if you would like the webfrontend changed, and how.
I can update the CPU report fa
> OK, this makes sense, though I'm not 100% happy with it. It would be
> nice if we could report a value that indicated "always zero" so the
> interface could not display it where appropriate in that case. I
> wonder
> what, if anything, would break if we returned -0.0.
>
what would be nice is
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:03:38AM -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
>
> --- Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:03:28AM -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > after receiving overwhelming feedback on my request for discussing
> > the
> > > addition
--- Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:03:28AM -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after receiving overwhelming feedback on my request for discussing
> the
> > addition of cpu_wio as a global metric :-) I just went ahead and
> did
> > it.
>
> Arg, app
On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 08:03:28AM -0700, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> after receiving overwhelming feedback on my request for discussing the
> addition of cpu_wio as a global metric :-) I just went ahead and did
> it.
Arg, apparently I should have read my mail more carefully. What is WIO
Hi,
after receiving overwhelming feedback on my request for discussing the
addition of cpu_wio as a global metric :-) I just went ahead and did
it.
All platforms now report cpu_wio to the data stream. Those platforms
that do not have the category just report "0".
Today the following platforms
13 matches
Mail list logo
