On Wednesday, May 28, 2003, at 01:57 PM, Jason A. Smith wrote:
I tried the updated webfrontend, It makes much more sense with the load
normalized to the number of CPUs instead of number of nodes. I also
noticed that you committed some patches for gmetad. Was that supposed
to fix the synching p
If I have some time I might try, but just a warning, I don't really know
php at all, just know a good amount perl and some basic html.
I tried the updated webfrontend, It makes much more sense with the load
normalized to the number of CPUs instead of number of nodes. I also
noticed that you commi
On Friday, May 23, 2003, at 01:34 PM, Jason A. Smith wrote:
Also, I noticed that the Avg Load percentages are derived from the
number of hosts up. I think it would be more accurate to use the
number
of CPUs instead, at least if it is going to be reported as a percentage
instead of an absolute
Actually, the only way I was able to stop the line wrapping in the
cluster view was to add the nowrap attribute to some of the table
elements. I think it was trying to vertically stretch out that nested
table because the right side had the 4 plots arranged in a 2x2 grid
causing that table cell to
Very nice, I like this a lot better.
I noticed another minor thing. The table on the left side of the
cluster & meta view plots is not handled in the same way. In the web
browser that I am using, this causes the CPU Totals and Avg Load
information to be wrapped on the cluster view making it hard
I just checked in changes that incorporate many of your suggestions. I
still need to solve the overall summary chatter, but I have found the
bug (in gmetad - thread synchronization) and I am working on the fix.
But this webfrontend works well. It puts the dead nodes on top of the
cluster view,
Jason,
These are all good comments. The grid summary stuff is an issue that
I'm working on now and I'm pretty sure I know what it is.
The small graphs are too small, I agree. I was playing around with
solutions to the "how to I visualize a big cluster" problem, but they
need to be bigger.
I just tried the latest gmetad & webfrontend from cvs to test out the
improved page load speed and other features and have a few comments:
First, the grid summary totals appear to be messed up in gmetad. Both
the rrds and xml data constantly display/report fluctuating numbers. Is
this a known bu
