Re: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-14 Thread Gilad Raphaelli
make gmetad more efficient. Gil - Original Message From: Martin Knoblauch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Gilad Raphaelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 8:19:36 PM Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (fin

Re: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-14 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Gilad, the code seems not very clean to me. One would have to check whether it is more efficient to first stat the directory. Just to be sure: this also happens with 3.0.2 and before? Thanks Martin --- Gilad Raphaelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bernard, > > The failed directories are t

Re: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-14 Thread Eli Stair
AIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:19:50 PM Subject: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3 Hi Martin: Finally had the time to test it, here's the text in the webpage now: Gmetad Web Frontend version 3.0.3.200604132304 Check for Updates. G

RE: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-14 Thread Bernard Li
Gilad Raphaelli Cc: Bernard Li; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3 I'm seeing reasonable load under FreeBSD 6.0 with 217 nodes. I wouldn't expect ~100 nodes to be

Re: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-14 Thread Brooks Davis
> ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:19:50 PM > Subject: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for > ganglia-3.0.3 > > RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3Hi > Martin: > &g

Re: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-14 Thread Jason A. Smith
D]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ganglia- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:19:50 PM > Subject: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) > tarball for ganglia-3.0.3 > > Hi Martin: > > Finally had the time to

Re: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-14 Thread Gilad Raphaelli
nal Message From: Bernard Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Gilad Raphaelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Friday, April 14, 2006 1:09:32 PM Subject: RE: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.

RE: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-14 Thread Bernard Li
From: Gilad Raphaelli [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 14/04/2006 13:06 To: Bernard Li; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3 I'm actually seeing 100% disk busy under

Re: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-14 Thread Gilad Raphaelli
CTED]; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:19:50 PM Subject: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3 RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3Hi Martin: Finally had the time to test it, here

[Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-13 Thread Bernard Li
Hi Martin: Finally had the time to test it, here's the text in the webpage now: Gmetad Web Frontend version 3.0.3.200604132304 Check for Updates. Gmetad Web Backend (gmetad) version 3.0.3.200604102000 Check for Updates. Looks like it's fixed. BTW, I tested Ganglia on Fedora Core 5 x86 and it

[Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-11 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Bernard, could you please test the following patch in "web" to solve this really really big problem :-) You need to run "./configure" to recreate "web/version.php". $diff -u -r1.9 ganglia.php --- ganglia.php 25 Mar 2006 01:53:57 - 1.9 +++ ganglia.php 11 Apr 2006 18:34:31 - @@ -33,7

[Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-10 Thread Bernard Li
Martin: Are you able to build SuSE x86_64 RPMs successfully with the tarball? Cheers, Bernard From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Martin Knoblauch Sent: Sat 08/04/2006 00:31 To: ganglia general; ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [Ganglia-gen

RE: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-10 Thread Chris Croswhite
: [Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3 Just tested building and running on Fedora Core 4 x86, everything checks out (minimal installation test) - did notice this minor issue though: Gmetad Web Frontend version 3.0.3 Check for Updates. Gmetad Web Backend

[Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-10 Thread Bernard Li
Just tested building and running on Fedora Core 4 x86, everything checks out (minimal installation test) - did notice this minor issue though: Gmetad Web Frontend version 3.0.3 Check for Updates. Gmetad Web Backend (gmetad) version 3.0.3.200604102000 Check for Updates. Notice the versions are

[Ganglia-developers] RE: [Ganglia-general] New (final?) tarball for ganglia-3.0.3

2006-04-08 Thread Bernard Li
Thanks Martin. Just a quick note saying that with this tarball, you should be able to successfully build a working RPM on SuSE Linux (with correct init scripts and such). Cheers, Bernard From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Martin Knoblauch Sent: Sat 08/04