On 9/14/05, michael chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because this is my first patch, I wasn't sure if the patch came out
funny or not. When I first made the patch with the instructions at
I hate making extra noise, but I believe I forgot to clean up the
backup files in my directory, so I ended
Hi Mike,
the patch looks fine and applies to current CVS in a dry-run. Do we
want it in 3.0.2?
Just one remark. I personally like patches created with diff -u.
This format makes it easier to see the actual changes. At least in my
opinion. Maybe we should change the documentation.
Cheers
On 9/14/05, Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mike,
the patch looks fine and applies to current CVS in a dry-run.
That'd be because I just created it from current CVS. :)
Do we want it in 3.0.2?
Doesn't matter to me - if it doesn't break anything (e.g. applying
other patches),
