>>> On 11/7/2008 at 5:05 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:26:42AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> >>> On 11/6/2008 at 5:07 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
>> Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 10:26:42AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >>> On 11/6/2008 at 5:07 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
> Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 06:13:47PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> >> Carlo,
> >> In the STATUS file you commen
>>> On 11/6/2008 at 5:07 AM, in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Carlo
Marcelo Arenas Belon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 06:13:47PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
>> Carlo,
>> In the STATUS file you commented that the spoofing patch needs more
> work.
>
> my comment was about
On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 06:13:47PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote:
> Carlo,
> In the STATUS file you commented that the spoofing patch needs more work.
my comment was about the spoofing "feature" needing more work in 3.1 as you
pointed out below.
the patch just makes the problem bigger by adding
Carlo,
In the STATUS file you commented that the spoofing patch needs more work.
Can you explain what work needs to be done. Other than supporting the short
commandline for spoofing a heartbeat, AFAICT everything is working as it
should. I have committed a spoofing example python module i
