One way to make it non-disruptive for 3.1 would be making this new
behavior configurable (as I suggested in the bug) - is it worth the
extra effort of adding a config option for this, or is 3.2 intended to
be released in the new future?
There isn't a planned date for a 3.2
I tried to attach this solution to the bug report, but I get this error:
You did not enter a valid attachment number.
Anyhow, this is a solution for bug 232:
http://bugzilla.ganglia.info/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232
As a consequence of applying this patch:
- whenever an RRD is
On 7/16/2009 at 8:07 AM, in message 4a5f3430.20...@pocock.com.au, Daniel
Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
I tried to attach this solution to the bug report, but I get this error:
You did not enter a valid attachment number.
Anyhow, this is a solution for bug 232:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 10:48, Brad Nicholesbnicho...@novell.com wrote:
On 7/16/2009 at 8:07 AM, in message 4a5f3430.20...@pocock.com.au, Daniel
Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
I tried to attach this solution to the bug report, but I get this error:
You did not enter a valid attachment
Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 7/16/2009 at 8:07 AM, in message 4a5f3430.20...@pocock.com.au, Daniel
Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
I tried to attach this solution to the bug report, but I get this error:
You did not enter a valid attachment number.
Anyhow, this is a solution
On 7/16/2009 at 9:10 AM, in message 4a5f42d8.9060...@pocock.com.au, Daniel
Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 7/16/2009 at 8:07 AM, in message 4a5f3430.20...@pocock.com.au, Daniel
Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
I tried to attach this solution to the
Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 7/16/2009 at 9:10 AM, in message 4a5f42d8.9060...@pocock.com.au,
Daniel
Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 7/16/2009 at 8:07 AM, in message 4a5f3430.20...@pocock.com.au,
Daniel
Pocock
On 7/16/2009 at 9:30 AM, in message 4a5f47a1.3020...@pocock.com.au, Daniel
Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
Brad Nicholes wrote:
On 7/16/2009 at 9:10 AM, in message 4a5f42d8.9060...@pocock.com.au,
Daniel
Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
Brad Nicholes wrote:
On
Hi Daniel:
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:10 AM, Daniel Pocockdan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
Or maybe someone can suggest a clever way to handle existing installs?
However it is done, it would involve scanning all the cluster
directories, I'm not sure I would want gmetad to do that every time it
