On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 02:57:50AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote:
> Hi Seth,
>
> the comments came from Brooks. Hi Brooks, care to elaborate what
> problems you see with the pidfile stuff from Seth?
The big one is that if you use pidfile existence as the measure of the
server being running, you
Hi Seth,
the comments came from Brooks. Hi Brooks, care to elaborate what
problems you see with the pidfile stuff from Seth?
Cheers
Martin
--- Seth Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not able to make this break. Are more details available?
>
> -seth
>
>
> Martin Knoblauch wrot
.net
> Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] gmetad umask trouble
>
> Hi Seth,
>
> thanks. I will take this one before 3.0.2.
>
> Someone else hinted that your pidfile stuff may have problems when a
> pidfile without a process exists. I haven't checked myself.
>
I'm not able to make this break. Are more details available?
-seth
Martin Knoblauch wrote:
Hi Seth,
thanks. I will take this one before 3.0.2.
Someone else hinted that your pidfile stuff may have problems when a
pidfile without a process exists. I haven't checked myself. do you have
Hi Seth,
thanks. I will take this one before 3.0.2.
Someone else hinted that your pidfile stuff may have problems when a
pidfile without a process exists. I haven't checked myself. do you have
any comments?
Cheers
Martin
--- Seth Alves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello, here is a patch t
Hello, here is a patch to my last patch.
I set the umask to be too restrictive, and then left it. When gmetad
tries to make new directories, they come out like this:
drw-r--r-x __SummaryInfo__/
and then it can't write new files into them.
-seth
--- daemon_init.c 2005-10-27
