RE: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.0.3 status

2006-04-06 Thread Bernard Li
ink you need to do a special request at SF to do that. Cheers, Bernard > -Original Message- > From: Martin Knoblauch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 23:40 > To: Bernard Li; Ganglia Developers > Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.0.3 sta

RE: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.0.3 status

2006-04-06 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Hi Richard, as far as I can see, those changes are checked in. This is the changelog since the last tarball: 2006-04-05 12:28 knobi1 * lib/libgmond.c (1.27): MKN: make "gmond -t" output more complete to match the documentation. 2006-03-29 09:42 knobi1 * Big update to

RE: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.0.3 status

2006-04-06 Thread Richard.Grevis
t: 06 April 2006 07:40 To: Bernard Li; Ganglia Developers Subject: Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.0.3 status Hi Bernard, Is there anything in the 3.0.3 codebase that would force an immediate release? Otherwise I would propose sometime in May? I will do a second tarball release later this week. Th

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.0.3 status

2006-04-05 Thread Martin Knoblauch
Hi Bernard, Is there anything in the 3.0.3 codebase that would force an immediate release? Otherwise I would propose sometime in May? I will do a second tarball release later this week. The CVS outage at SF prevented my AprilsFool plan last week. So, if you have anything important brewing that yo