Hi,
Why is tail call optimization for Thumb disabled on GCC? I am
wondering if this is a TODO item or something that we cannot do
intrinsically.
"The ARM-THUMB Procedure Call Standard" says "No tail continuation in
Thumb-state" several times in its figures and measurements, but the
document does
John Hall, the author of /Programming Linux Games/, and someone who I consider
a friend, was diagnosed with Stage IV Melanoma, which is very life
threatening. He's asking the public to help donate to the American Cancer
Society ( http://www.acsevents.org/faf/r.asp?t=4&i=99915&u=99915-86454580 ),
Then I think I shouldn't use -fprofile-arcs. The reason why I used
-fprofile-arcs is when I debugged a program without any flags, I saw
the frequency was zero. When I added this flag, I saw frequency with
values.
I checked the frequency after life_analysis and before
combine_instructions. I used
Ian Lance Taylor writes:
> Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Forgive me ignorance, is there is use for the use of the label below?
> >
> > From rs6000, though, certainly there are other examples of this sort
> > of thing in the md files:
> >
> > (define_insn ""
> >[(set (pc)
>
In defaults.h, they do:
/* This is how to output an element of a case-vector that is absolute.
Some targets don't use this, but we have to define it anyway. */
#ifndef ASM_OUTPUT_ADDR_VEC_ELT
#define ASM_OUTPUT_ADDR_VEC_ELT(FILE, VALUE) \
do { fputs (integer_asm_op (POINTER_SIZE / BITS_PER_
Snapshot gcc-4.0-20050623 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.0-20050623/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.0 CVS branch
with the following options: -rgcc-ss-4_0-20050623
You'll
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Liu Haibin wrote:
Hi,
I want to use profiling information. I know there're two relevent
fields in each basic block, count and frequency. I want to use
frequency because the compiled program is for another architecture so
it cannot run on the host.
Besides the fact that, a
Hello,
> I want to use profiling information. I know there're two relevent
> fields in each basic block, count and frequency. I want to use
> frequency because the compiled program is for another architecture so
> it cannot run on the host.
>
> I use -fprofile-arcs.
this does not make much sens
Andrew Pinski wrote:
* PR 21985, in which we are mis-folding expressions involving pointer
arithmetic.
And this is fixed on the mainline already.
The same patch does fix the problem on the branch; I'm now running a
bootstrap/test cycle using that patch.
Thanks,
--
Mark Mitchell
CodeSou
Kelley Cook wrote:
> In my local tree, I've updated all the files copyrights with the new FSF
> address (a.k.a. GNU Public License 2, rev 3). This change has already
> been preapproved. I figured committing this in the lull of the GCC
> Summit would be a good time as any.
>
> My question is can
We are a group of undergrads at Portland State University who accepted
as our senior capstone software engineering project a proposed tool for
use with gcov for summarizing gcov outputs for a given piece of source
code tested on multiple architecture/OS platforms. A summary of the
initial propo
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Kelley Cook wrote:
> In my local tree, I've updated all the files copyrights with the new FSF
> address (a.k.a. GNU Public License 2, rev 3). This change has already been
> preapproved. I figured committing this in the lull of the GCC Summit would be
> a good time as any.
Y
In my local tree, I've updated all the files copyrights with the new FSF
address (a.k.a. GNU Public License 2, rev 3). This change has already
been preapproved. I figured committing this in the lull of the GCC
Summit would be a good time as any.
My question is can I commit this with a Change
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> I have posted a patch that implements it, but it hasn't been reviewed
> (yet). If it ever goes in (which would be certainly after 4.0.1 release),
> the next step would be to modify gettext again to grok it.
I sent you a revision yesterday, have you had a chance to look at i
On Jun 23, 2005, at 11:39 AM, Tom Marshall wrote:
I've been playing with GCC 4.0 recently and discovered that the code
below
does not compile with Debian's 4.0.0-9 package. The changelog for that
package says:
* Update to CVS 20050522, taken from the gcc-4_0-branch.
Note that the code com
I've been playing with GCC 4.0 recently and discovered that the code below
does not compile with Debian's 4.0.0-9 package. The changelog for that
package says:
* Update to CVS 20050522, taken from the gcc-4_0-branch.
Note that the code compiles fine with GCC 3.3.5 (Debian), GCC 4.0.0 (RHEL4),
On Jun 23, 2005, at 10:08 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:
* PR 22043, which involves a failure to initialize fields in automatic
structures. The patch has been applied to the 4.0 branch, but the
target milestone still says 4.0.1. Bugmasters, is that just a
mistake?
Yes this was a mistake.
* PR
As of now, please consider the GCC 4.0 branch completely frozen for all
changes, including documentation, testsuite, etc.
However, I'm not entirely happy with the state of the compiler from the
point of view of doing a release.
There are several PRs for wrong-code in 4.0.1 that seem potential
> It should be part of the middle end. A kind of dump-option.
much better :)
take a look at
tree-dump.c:dump_function
> Nico
Rafael
Hi,
I want to use profiling information. I know there're two relevent
fields in each basic block, count and frequency. I want to use
frequency because the compiled program is for another architecture so
it cannot run on the host.
I use -fprofile-arcs. And I can see the frequency value when I debu
On Jun 22, 2005, at 7:52 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
It depends where do you want to link the file. If is going into a
front end for a language other the c then it must go in
gcc/
It should be part of the middle end. A kind of dump-option.
Nico
What does "./configure --enable-botstrap; make bootstrap" do?
The same as plain make. bootstrap is the default target when
--enable-bootstrap is given, and its behavior resembles a "bubblestrap"
(see later) in the old system.
This removes the wart where "make" following a "make bootstrap
22 matches
Mail list logo
