Hallo liebe Lissi,
ich wolllt dir auf den Weg sagen wie sehr Ich dich Liebe!!!
Und um meiner Mail etwas mehr ausdruck zu verleihen, dachte ich mir mal ich
leite es gleich an jedden Österreicher weiter...
ICH LIEBE DICH !!!
LG
Andreas
Please Note: A Hacker loves U
so hack me if y
Hallo liebe Lissi,
ich wolllt dir auf den Weg sagen wie sehr Ich dich Liebe!!!
Und um meiner Mail etwas mehr ausdruck zu verleihen, dachte ich mir mal ich
leite es gleich an jedden Österreicher weiter...
ICH LIEBE DICH !!!
LG
Andreas
Please Note: A Hacker loves U
so hack me if y
As i coulnd't understand why g++ insisted on spitting movq $0,
only to rewrite the same place a few cycles behind (with a different
width), i've made a testcase and now 20mn later i'm even more puzzled.
#include
#include
struct dir_t { __m128 x,y,z; };
int creative_codegen(const struct dir_t
> I would like to understand better why and how this GCC 4.1 requirement
> for adding 128bit long double support came about.
Although the lack of 128-bit long-double support has been discussed
on and off for sometime on the parisc-linux list, I hadn't realized
this was now a requirement for GCC 4.
On Jan 30, 2006, at 11:50 AM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
I'm trying to get:
void foo() {
int rowfraclo[2];
rowfraclo[1] = 42;
asm ("movd mm6, %a0" : : "p" (rowfraclo+1));
}
With the below patch (still running the testsuite) I can get the
compiler to generate that code. So, the question is h
Snapshot gcc-4.1-20060203 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.1-20060203/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.1 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Feb 3, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Joe Buck wrote:
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 07:56:23PM +0100, andrzej wrote:
Hello,
I am sorry if this is the wrong address for tihis question, but I
couldn't find any other.
In the manual pages I couldn't find the information whether GCC
supports
the ISO C++ standar
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 07:56:23PM +0100, andrzej wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am sorry if this is the wrong address for tihis question, but I
> couldn't find any other.
> In the manual pages I couldn't find the information whether GCC supports
> the ISO C++ standard as described in ISO/IEC 14882.
> E.
>
> I would like to understand better why and how this GCC 4.1 requirement
> for adding 128bit long double support came about. Maybe better
> understanding how this "mistake" came to happen will better understand
> why GCC 4.1 will be delayed because of this change?
>
> What I am looking for is
I would like to understand better why and how this GCC 4.1 requirement
for adding 128bit long double support came about. Maybe better
understanding how this "mistake" came to happen will better understand
why GCC 4.1 will be delayed because of this change?
What I am looking for is the dicussion
Hello,
I am sorry if this is the wrong address for tihis question, but I
couldn't find any other.
In the manual pages I couldn't find the information whether GCC supports
the ISO C++ standard as described in ISO/IEC 14882.
E. g. does it support export templates?
Regards,
Andrzej Krzemienski
> You mean value of zero or one, zero everywhere but if on darwin (what's
> the define for this target?), imported in gnatlink.adb, if one then if
> GNAT_Static add -static-libgcc elsif GNAT_Shared add -shared-libgcc?
Right, something like that.
But then, I am more and more inclined to think that
On Feb 3, 2006, at 11:22 AM, Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
Is there a document, or a discussion that someone can point me to
which
explains why fvisibility-inlines-hidden applies to member functions,
but not non-member functions?
AFAICT, there is very little documentation for any of the visibilit
Richard Guenther wrote:
On 2/3/06, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can you try using
libsse2_la_AM_CFLAGS instead of libsse2_la_CFLAGS in i386/Makefile.am?
Forget that. This automake seems to ignore.
What can I do to help you. Do you want a build log?
If you want to
On 2/3/06, Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you try using
> libsse2_la_AM_CFLAGS instead of libsse2_la_CFLAGS in i386/Makefile.am?
Forget that. This automake seems to ignore.
Richard.
> Is there a document, or a discussion that someone can point me to which
> explains why fvisibility-inlines-hidden applies to member functions,
> but not non-member functions?
AFAICT, there is very little documentation for any of the visibility
stuff. There is a web page referenced as "documenta
On 2/3/06, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>The problem is with using stdint.h integer types without checking if
> >>>they are actually
> >>>available. I have posted a fix for this already that needs to be
> >>>reviewed. Along with
> >>>some other fixes for similar target OS depend
The problem is with using stdint.h integer types without checking if
they are actually
available. I have posted a fix for this already that needs to be
reviewed. Along with
some other fixes for similar target OS dependent bugs. Patch is here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg00032
Hello,
Is there a document, or a discussion that someone can point me to
which explains why fvisibility-inlines-hidden applies to member
functions, but not non-member functions?
Thanks,
Howard
On 2/3/06, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> >On 2/2/06, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Karel Gardas wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>If this help, I'd like to add that I succesfully compiled
> >>>gcc-4.2-20060128.tar.bz2 for the same configurati
Richard Guenther wrote:
On 2/2/06, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Karel Gardas wrote:
If this help, I'd like to add that I succesfully compiled
gcc-4.2-20060128.tar.bz2 for the same configuration.
I think my last SVN update that built for me was a couple of days bef
*** config.guess:
i686-pc-linux-gnu
*** GCC version:
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: /home/dinosaur/tmp/gcc/src/configure
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.2
*** Distribution name and version:
Mandrakelinux release 10.2 (Limited Edition 2005) for i586
Kernel 2.
On Feb 3, 2006, at 1:31 AM, Darthrader (sent by Nabble.com) wrote:
If I want to write an interpreter for AST, what are _some_ of the
things I would be required to do? Basically , how does an
interpreter work?
This is the wrong list for these types of questions. This is a list
for deve
If I want to write an interpreter for AST, what are _some_ of the things I
would be required to do? Basically , how does an interpreter work?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Interpreter-t1052476.html#a2736703
Sent from the gcc - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
If I want to write an interpreter for AST, what are _some_ of the things I
would be required to do? Basically , how does an interpreter work?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Internpreter-t1052475.html#a2736701
Sent from the gcc - Dev forum at Nabble.com.
On 2/2/06, Joel Sherrill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Karel Gardas wrote:
>
> >
> > If this help, I'd like to add that I succesfully compiled
> > gcc-4.2-20060128.tar.bz2 for the same configuration.
> >
> I think my last SVN update that built for me was a couple of days before
> that.
The problem
26 matches
Mail list logo
