Matt Davis writes:
> I am just trying to settle down on my PhD Computer Science dissertation
> topic. I want something low-level, compiler related, and more so
> useful/practical. I am considering region-based memory management, to show
> memory efficiency and safety. For imperative languages,
I'm hoping someone here could take the time to outline what I need to do (i'm
not looking for code but if you point me to some i'd appreciate it).
I'd like to track an object from the it's created until it's destroyed (in
C++). And then see if a certain method of it is called or not. To keep it
well, that explains it nicely. thanks
Hello,
I am just trying to settle down on my PhD Computer Science dissertation
topic. I want something low-level, compiler related, and more so
useful/practical. I am considering region-based memory management, to show
memory efficiency and safety. For imperative languages, such as c, this is
ra
> Hi,
> I wish to selectively enable specific optimizations to observe its effect
> on the source. My project requires me to do this analysis. It seemed, the
> -f* flags would enable me to do that. But it turns out that individual
> optimizations can't be enabled like that, and all the optimization
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20100826 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20100826/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 10:41 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Basile Starynkevitch writes:
>
> > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 12:23 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >> On 08/24/2010 07:38 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> >> > (actually, this happened to us before e.g.
> >> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patch
Basile Starynkevitch writes:
> On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 12:23 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 08/24/2010 07:38 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
>> > (actually, this happened to us before e.g.
>> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg02178.html etc).
>>
>> Sorry, but that's what happens w
Would the wiki be clearer if the word "alone" was added?
First, individual optimization options alone (-f*) do not enable optimization
On 26 August 2010 12:56, wrote:
>
> a) Is there any way to observe the effect of a particular optimization,
> without the obvious option of using a lot of -fno switches.
> b) And do the -f* switches serve any purpose, if I can't enable individual
> optimizations using them.
You need an optimisat
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 12:23 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 08/24/2010 07:38 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
> > (actually, this happened to us before e.g.
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg02178.html etc).
>
> Sorry, but that's what happens when you ignore the maintainers' opinio
Hi,
I wish to selectively enable specific optimizations to observe its effect
on the source. My project requires me to do this analysis. It seemed, the
-f* flags would enable me to do that. But it turns out that individual
optimizations can't be enabled like that, and all the optimizations at a
spe
On 08/24/2010 07:38 PM, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
(actually, this happened to us before e.g.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-06/msg02178.html etc).
Sorry, but that's what happens when you ignore the maintainers' opinion.
Do not misunderstand me: I'm very interested in your works and
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Jeff Saremi wrote:
> I wanted to go through declarations in a function and print them out so as to
> get more familiar with them before being able to manipulate them.
> I wrote this function as a plugin; it successfully writes out all statements
> but mysteriousl
14 matches
Mail list logo
