On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 4:30 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Anton reports that GCC fails to build on FreeBSD/ia64. Any ideas
> on what to try? I assume it's just a small change that caused this
> regression (this used to work some releases ago).
>
> gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc4
Anton reports that GCC fails to build on FreeBSD/ia64. Any ideas
on what to try? I assume it's just a small change that caused this
regression (this used to work some releases ago).
gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/lang/gcc46/work/build/gcc'
gmake[4]: *** No rule to make target
`/usr/po
I was working on a gcc bugzilla project upgrade under Daniel Berlin's
guidance but have not been able to contact him in a long while.
Can anyone give me a current address for him or another dev's name who
I can work with?
Thanks.
Regards,
-Tom
Thomas M. Browder, Jr.
Niceville, Florida
USA
> You should be able to use your @gcc.gnu.org account which has full
> permissions to close bugs. Just use the forgot password on your
> @gcc.gnu.org account. If that does not work, is the email that your
> @gcc account is being forward to correct. Use "ssh gcc.gnu.org email
> emailaddr...@emai
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Nicola Pero
wrote:
> Apologies for the trivial question - I haven't worked on GCC for a while.
>
> I fixed PR libobjc/19850. I guess I'm supposed to resolve the bug now but I
> don't seem to have
> the permissions to do it in bugzilla (my email is
> nicola.p...@m
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:24 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 09/06/2010 06:18 PM, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Richard Guenther
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, NightStrike wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Sep
On 09/06/2010 06:18 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, NightStrike wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, NightStrike wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>>
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Do you have a pointer to testresults you'd l
Apologies for the trivial question - I haven't worked on GCC for a while.
I fixed PR libobjc/19850. I guess I'm supposed to resolve the bug now but I
don't seem to have
the permissions to do it in bugzilla (my email is
nicola.p...@meta-innovation.com).
Can that be enabled ? :-)
Apologies it
On 9/6/2010 9:21 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, NightStrike wrote:
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
Do you have a pointer to testresults you'd like us to use for reference?
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 6:19 PM, NightStrike wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>>
>>> Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>> > Do you have a pointer to testresults you'd like us to use for reference?
>>> >
>>> > From our release criter
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
>> Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> > Do you have a pointer to testresults you'd like us to use for reference?
>> >
>> > From our release criteria, for secondary platforms we have:
>> >
>> > • The comp
6.9.2010 6:17, Dennis kirjoitti:
I'm using gentoo distribution (including gmp/mpfr/mpc) that could compile
gcc-4.5.0, 4.5.1, and many snapshots correctly, including the recent one
gcc-4.5-20100902,
but when I tried to compile gcc-4.6, any snapshot version, even recent
gcc-4.6-20100904,
it a
i want a a gcc
Hi,
> Doloop optimization fails to be applied on the following inner loop
> when compiling for PowerPC (GCC -r162294) due to:
>
> Doloop: number of iterations too costly to compute.
strength reduction is performed in ivopts, introducing new variable:
for (p = inptr; p < something; p += 3)
..
2010/9/6 Basile Starynkevitch :
> On Mon, 6 Sep 2010 06:36:48 +0300
> Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
>
>> 2010/9/2 Basile Starynkevitch :
>> > Hello Laurynas, Diego & all the list.
>> >
>> > A precise question about gengtype (the current trunk one)
>> >
>> > I have the impression that every member of th
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Cheng Rk wrote:
> --- On Mon, 6/9/10, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>> From: Justin P. Mattock
>> Subject: Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly?
>> To: "Dennis"
>> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, crq...@ymail.com
>> Date: Monday, 6 September, 2010, 9:18 AM
>> On 09/05/2010 08
--- On Mon, 6/9/10, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> From: Justin P. Mattock
> Subject: Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly?
> To: "Dennis"
> Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org, crq...@ymail.com
> Date: Monday, 6 September, 2010, 9:18 AM
> On 09/05/2010 08:17 PM, Dennis
[...]
> hm... an obvious question would be
On Mon, 6 Sep 2010, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> > Do you have a pointer to testresults you'd like us to use for reference?
> >
> > From our release criteria, for secondary platforms we have:
> >
> >• The compiler bootstraps successfully, and the C++ runtime library
> >
On 09/05/2010 08:17 PM, Dennis wrote:
Hi, all,
I'm using gentoo distribution (including gmp/mpfr/mpc) that could compile
gcc-4.5.0, 4.5.1, and many snapshots correctly, including the recent one
gcc-4.5-20100902,
but when I tried to compile gcc-4.6, any snapshot version, even recent
gcc-4.6-2
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 09:12:57AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 08/30/2010 08:36 PM, Adam Jiang wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 10:43:44AM -0700, David Daney wrote:
> >>On 08/30/2010 09:46 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >>>On 08/30/2010 03:45 AM, Adam Jiang wrote:
> When I read the source i
21 matches
Mail list logo
