On 18.02.11 at 18:53, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
How about only allowing REL relocations in executables and DSOes?
That'd be at least part of it, but I'd still prefer not forbidding them
altogether, but also not requiring an implementation to support
them (just to repeat it - in a long
Hi!
This was already discussed in this list some time ago [0]. But it came
up again when restarting the discussion for the proposed new armhf port
for Debian.
[0] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-07/msg00179.html
My arguments for why a distinct triplet is needed can be found in [1],
it's a big
On 02/21/2011 04:42 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 06:32:30PM +0100, Prof. Roberto Bagnara wrote:
We announce the availability of PPL 0.11.1, a new release of the Parma
Polyhedra Library. This release includes several important bug fixes
and performance improvements.
The mpc development team is pleased to announce the release 0.9 of the
library, Epilobium montanum. For more information, please see
http://mpc.multiprecision.org/ .
Andreas
Hi,
I've copied mainline to pretty-ipa branch killing all the changes that was left
unmerged there.
I intend to use it for IPA and LTO related development to be merged at next
stage1, immediately
for the inliner related cleanups we seems to be cummulating at the mainling
list.
I would like the
Hi,
Any news about this?
Regards,
Jie
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Jie Zhang wrote:
I agree. I think Joseph is the best candidate for the maintainer of the
option handling
Sorry, I just noticed that Joseph has been listed as the maintainer of
option handling.
Jie
On 02/21/2011 11:56 PM, Jie Zhang wrote:
Hi,
Any news about this?
Regards,
Jie
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011, Gerald Pfeifer
On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
AIX provides two versions of long double and declares all of the C99
long double symbols in math.h header file. One implementation aliases
long double to IEEE double precision type and the other implementation
aliases long double to IBM's
An associated bug report would be appreciated (mailing list
discussions are useful for raising awareness, but are more likely to
be forgotten over time than bug reports): http://bugs.python.org
Just did that; thanks!
-- Hoyt
+ Hoyt Koepke
+
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
if you'd consider accepting something ressembling the attached patch
A pre-existing condition, but in general where the code you're changing
hardcodes gnu that's wrong - arm*-*-linux-uclibceabi is also meant to be
valid. So if you allow a suffix
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:04 AM, Jan Beulich jbeul...@novell.com wrote:
On 18.02.11 at 18:53, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
How about only allowing REL relocations in executables and DSOes?
That'd be at least part of it, but I'd still prefer not forbidding them
altogether, but also not
David Daney dda...@caviumnetworks.com writes:
Background:
Current MIPS 32-bit ABIs (both o32 and n32) are restricted to 2GB of
user virtual memory space. This is due the way MIPS32 memory space is
segmented. Only the range from 0..2^31-1 is available. Pointer
values are always sign
Gentlemen,
The example of the C preprocessor implementation of MIN is erroneous:
#define MIN(X,Y) ((X) (Y) ? : (X) : (Y))
should read:
#define MIN(X,Y) ((X) (Y) ? (X) : (Y))
- Bob
+--+
| Robert Bob Gezelter
On 19.02.11 23:01, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 10:53 PM, Christian Grössler
ch...@groessler.org wrote:
The failures come from the assembler which complains about the out of range
shift counts.
Should I disable them or is there any reason unknown to me that these tests
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Michael Haubenwallner
michael.haubenwall...@salomon.at wrote:
On 01/-10/-28163 08:59 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
AIX provides two versions of long double and declares all of the C99
long double symbols in math.h header file. One implementation aliases
long
On 21 February 2011 20:57, Robert Gezelter wrote:
Gentlemen,
The example of the C preprocessor implementation of MIN is erroneous:
#define MIN(X,Y) ((X) (Y) ? : (X) : (Y))
should read:
#define MIN(X,Y) ((X) (Y) ? (X) : (Y))
Thanks for the report, but I don't think anyone's
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 12:10:03PM +0100, Roberto Bagnara wrote:
On 02/21/2011 04:42 AM, Jack Howarth wrote:
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 06:32:30PM +0100, Prof. Roberto Bagnara wrote:
We announce the availability of PPL 0.11.1, a new release of the Parma
Polyhedra Library. This release includes
Hi,
My name is Edmon Begoli and I am a graduate student in computer science.
I am writing a graduate research paper on how are concurrent routines complied
in different languages. I want to start with a sort of a base case showing how
are Mutexes and thread initiation routines in C compiled by
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 01:32, Prof. Roberto Bagnara
bagn...@cs.unipr.it wrote:
We announce the availability of PPL 0.11.1, a new release of the Parma
Polyhedra Library. This release includes several important bug fixes
and performance improvements.
The precise list of user-visible changes
On Mon, 2011-02-21 at 17:59:06 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011, Guillem Jover wrote:
if you'd consider accepting something ressembling the attached patch
A pre-existing condition, but in general where the code you're changing
hardcodes gnu that's wrong -
Hi,
Is there any standalone gcc 4.5.2 build without the support of gmp, mpfr and
mpc.
Pls. let me know what features are integrated using gcc 4.5.2 to incorporate
for any builds.
Regards,
Gururaj
Build Release Engr
On Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:26:09 -0500
Edmon Begoli ebeg...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
My name is Edmon Begoli and I am a graduate student in computer science.
I am writing a graduate research paper on how are concurrent routines complied
in different languages. I want to start with a sort of a
Hi,
I notice that the internals document says The header file config.h
includes tm.h and most compiler source files include config.h. in
Target Description Macros and Functions section.
This may need modification since config.h doesn't include tm.h for
now, if I'm not wrong.
Thanks,
Mingjie
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46244
--- Comment #16 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com paul.richard.thomas
at gmail dot com 2011-02-21 08:25:51 UTC ---
Dear Mikael,
snip
Actually none of the gfc_compare_type/gfc_TK_compatible changes are absolutely
necessary to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47796
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39029
--- Comment #3 from Olaf van der Spek olafvdspek at gmail dot com 2011-02-21
09:37:03 UTC ---
g++ -o b.h.gch a.h
g++ c.cpp
a.h:
#pragma once // a.h:1:9: warning: #pragma once in main file
c.cpp:
#include b.h
#include b.h // c.cpp:2:15: error:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47830
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #15 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
09:44:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Could you try building with the patch on a ppc box if you have one, without
the
Fix to tree.c in it, so that it will fail,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
Olaf van der Spek olafvdspek at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42722
--- Comment #12 from Peter A. Bigot bigotp at acm dot org 2011-02-21 09:45:15
UTC ---
Created attachment 23418
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23418
Test case (requires msp430 back end)
Sorry, I don't speak dejagnu well enough
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42722
--- Comment #13 from Peter A. Bigot bigotp at acm dot org 2011-02-21 09:45:52
UTC ---
Created attachment 23419
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23419
Generated code before patch applied
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42722
--- Comment #14 from Peter A. Bigot bigotp at acm dot org 2011-02-21 09:46:30
UTC ---
Created attachment 23420
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23420
Generated code after patch applied
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570
Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42722
--- Comment #15 from Peter A. Bigot bigotp at acm dot org 2011-02-21 09:48:23
UTC ---
Created attachment 23421
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23421
Fixes problem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42722
--- Comment #16 from Peter A. Bigot bigotp at acm dot org 2011-02-21 09:50:00
UTC ---
I've now taken over the msp430 back end and created the attached patch and test
case. This is relative to the gcc trunk as of a couple weeks ago; still
present
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31469
--- Comment #1 from Peter A. Bigot bigotp at acm dot org 2011-02-21 09:51:24
UTC ---
Created attachment 23422
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23422
Fixes problem (resubmit, lost due to collision)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31469
Peter A. Bigot bigotp at acm dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bigotp at acm dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47831
Summary: avoid if-convertion if the conditional instructions
and following conditional branch has the same
condition
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2011-02-21 10:03:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
Could you try building with the patch on a ppc box if you have one, without
the
Fix to tree.c in it, so that it will
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47832
Summary: [4.6 Regression] ObjC errors on structures with
flexible data members
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #17 from Iain Sandoe iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21 10:08:51
UTC ---
there was no intention to create a hack (or any other form of expedient work);
... if it is wrong, then it is likely a mistake on my part when importing the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348
Dominique d'Humieres dominiq at lps dot ens.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47832
--- Comment #1 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21 10:37:10
UTC ---
Hi Jakub,
@interface T
{
struct S *u;
};
@end
struct S * is a pointer, right ? So it's always the size of a pointer ?
In that case, I don't see any
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47830
--- Comment #2 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt kuehro at gmx dot de 2011-02-21 10:38:16
UTC ---
Hi,
There are two errors
For those having - like me - problems to spot the second error:
static long double prechalf = nexafterl (0.5L,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47825
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47832
Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47822
--- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
10:44:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
(In reply to comment #15)
Could you try building with the patch on a ppc box if you have one,
without the
Fix to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47827
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47830
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus burnus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
11:19:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
well besides the typo nexfaterl
Well, that was actually the problem I had - my brain magically added the t
;-)
(For NetBSD there
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47832
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
12:02:58 UTC ---
As I said, I don't know ObjC, so if you could fix it, I'd appreciate it.
That said, ISO C99 allows:
struct A { int a; char b[]; };
struct A a; // Here
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47833
Summary: ICE during GC in gt_ggc_mx_pending_template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47348
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas pault at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21 12:06:42
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Any plan to backport the fix in revision 170317?
I had not planned so to do but would respond positively to popular pressure how
far
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47833
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47487
Alan Modra amodra at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47834
Summary: Compiler uses unsafe math optimizations even
-funsafe-math-optimizations is not given
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35797
Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
12:30:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
I'll have a look.
However, I still think an option to really enable (almost) all warnings should
be added. I don't agree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47834
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stenedjo at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
12:39:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
(In reply to comment #5)
It is implicitly in the manual as those that are not mentioned as enabled by
Wall or Wextra.
So The
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
--- Comment #9 from Olaf van der Spek olafvdspek at gmail dot com 2011-02-21
12:47:24 UTC ---
So The list in the manual already. is false.
The information is in the manual, even if not as an explicit list.
That's true, but not what was
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38306
--- Comment #23 from Joost VandeVondele Joost.VandeVondele at pci dot uzh.ch
2011-02-21 12:53:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #22)
What is the performance with 4.3 -O2?
4.3:
gfortran -O2 -march=native -funroll-loops -ffast-math test.f90 ;
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31573
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
12:55:51 UTC ---
*** Bug 47824 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40850
Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40850
--- Comment #13 from Mikael Morin mikael at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
13:01:23 UTC ---
Comment 5 is not affected by the double free as the allocatable components are
never allocated during the program, only the containing entity is.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47796
--- Comment #7 from qihua.dai at intel dot com 2011-02-21 13:02:41 UTC ---
Hi,
I used -Wall -O2. But no warning for this situation.
gcc will print strict-aliasing related warning.
struct tmp1_s tmp;
tmp.a = 0xc; // this code line is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47832
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47824
--- Comment #11 from Olaf van der Spek olafvdspek at gmail dot com 2011-02-21
13:11:04 UTC ---
Dup.
No kidding?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567
Thomas Henlich thenlich at users dot sourceforge.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47820
--- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
13:38:54 UTC ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Feb 21 13:38:48 2011
New Revision: 170359
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170359
Log:
2011-02-21 Richard
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47820
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106
John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47825
H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|hjl at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567
--- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
14:22:51 UTC ---
OK, can you tell I am time slicing this one. ;)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47199
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47835
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/pr46909.c scan-tree-dump ifcombine
optimizing two comparisons to x_[0-9]+\(D\) != 4
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47567
--- Comment #22 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
14:32:14 UTC ---
On my system I get with:
print *, --
print (F0.0), -0.0 ! = -0.
print (F3.0), -0.0 ! = -0.
print (F2.0), -0.0 !
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47832
--- Comment #4 from Nicola Pero nicola at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21 14:33:14
UTC ---
for ObjC I guess it depends if in @interface there are variables (then
variables with flexible array members in theory could be treated there like
ISO
C99
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42108
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2009-11-19 16:49:51 |2011-02-21
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47778
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
14:35:20 UTC ---
Status update. I have more or less isolated the problem in list-read.c. I do
not have an exact solution yet, but I am able to get the test case to work. I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47835
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
14:37:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 23426
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23426
Tree dump.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47836
Summary: Some Cross Compiler can't build target-libiberty or
target-zlib
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47837
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-pred-7_a.c bogus warning (test for
bogus messages, line 26)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47487
--- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner bergner at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
15:02:40 UTC ---
I don't recall anyone adding GO support for powerpc{,64}-linux, so I'm guessing
such a patch should be added when that is submitted?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46321
--- Comment #2 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21 15:06:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
Note: There are four cases where a polymorphic deallocate is needed - though
some might end up in the same code path:
- explicit DEALLOCATE (cf.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47207
Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47838
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/foldconst-2.c scan-tree-dump-not
optimized fundamentals..0
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47838
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
15:12:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 23427
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23427
Tree dump.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47835
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47207
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill jason at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
15:35:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 21 15:35:44 2011
New Revision: 170365
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170365
Log:
PR c++/47207
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38219
--- Comment #11 from John David Anglin danglin at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
15:51:59 UTC ---
Still fails on hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20 with 4.6.0 revision 170207.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47106
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
15:53:54 UTC ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Feb 21 15:53:49 2011
New Revision: 170366
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=170366
Log:
PR debug/47106
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.6.0 |4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47839
Summary: ICE in dwarf2out.c:add_AT_specification
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: lto
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47839
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-02-21
16:19:20 UTC ---
--- a.f90
MODULE globalvar_mod
integer:: xstart, ystart, zstart, xstop, ystop, zstop
CONTAINS
END MODULE globalvar_mod
--- b.f90
MODULE PEC_mod
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47772
Jonathan 'Sky' Squirawski webmas...@sky-siteweb.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law law at redhat dot com 2011-02-21 16:56:18
UTC ---
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/18/11 13:56, dave at hiauly1 dot hia.nrc.ca wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47802
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47838
Mikael Pettersson mikpe at it dot uu.se changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpe at it dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47839
Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
