Consider this program under GNU/Linux (x86_64):
- np.c ---
#include
#include
#include
#include
static void handler(int sig)
{
printf("got signal %d\n", sig);
throw 1;
}
int (*my_vector)(int);
int *bar;
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
struct sigaction s
On Wed, 2011-05-04 at 12:03 +0200, Patrick Marlier wrote:
---Sorry for the late response.
> Dear Ismail,
>
> On 05/03/2011 11:18 PM, ismail wrote:
> >> ++ First of all, MEMCPY and MEMSET functions do not include any
> >> transaction identifier (id) and transactions inside the LeeTM fails
> >> d
Snapshot gcc-4.5-20110505 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.5-20110505/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.5 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
Bernd Schmidt writes:
> On 05/05/2011 11:53 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>> Jon Grant writes:
>>
>>> Is it expected that more than one -o option should be allowed by GCC
>>> on command line? The later -o option overriding earlier.
>>
>> Yes, this is expected. Most Unix utilities behave that wa
On 05/05/2011 11:53 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Jon Grant writes:
>
>> Is it expected that more than one -o option should be allowed by GCC
>> on command line? The later -o option overriding earlier.
>
> Yes, this is expected. Most Unix utilities behave that way: when an
> option with an argu
On Thu, May 05, 2011 at 11:33:44AM -0700, Paul Koning wrote:
> It sounds to me like the question "are you allowed to translate this" remains
> valid and open, even if this particular translator is not real.
Yes, the SC's discussing it with RMS now and I'm hopeful that there will
be some positive
Jon Grant writes:
> Is it expected that more than one -o option should be allowed by GCC
> on command line? The later -o option overriding earlier.
Yes, this is expected. Most Unix utilities behave that way: when an
option with an argument is specified twice, and it only makes sense to
specify
On 5 May 2011 22:30, Jon Grant wrote:
> Hello
>
> Just looking at this page:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gas
>
> I saw this text "(the GNU loader)". Is this really an alternative name
> for gas? I've not seen it called GNU loader elsewhere. I was wondering
> if the text could just be removed.
Hello
Is it expected that more than one -o option should be allowed by GCC
on command line? The later -o option overriding earlier. I had
expected the parameter checking to detect this duplication of options.
gcc (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3
$ gcc -W -Wall -o main main.c -omup.o
$ ls
main.c m
Hello
Just looking at this page:
http://gcc.gnu.org/faq.html#gas
I saw this text "(the GNU loader)". Is this really an alternative name
for gas? I've not seen it called GNU loader elsewhere. I was wondering
if the text could just be removed.
Please keep my email address in any replies.
Best re
er, wrong subject. I merged up to rev 173270.
Diego.
This merge brings the gimple-front-end branch up to 4.7. It needed
some minimal adjustments, but things seem to be working. Sandeep,
please make sure it does. You may need to rebase your patch before
committing it.
We need some tests in testsuite/gimple. Sandeep, do you think you
could add som
On 05/05/2011 21:46, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 15:16, Diego Novillo wrote:
I've always found MELT interesting as an exercise in impossibility and
[ ... ]
There was some confusion about my meaning here. It was meant as a
compliment. Sorry for the confusion.
Dieg
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 15:16, Diego Novillo wrote:
> I've always found MELT interesting as an exercise in impossibility and
> [ ... ]
There was some confusion about my meaning here. It was meant as a
compliment. Sorry for the confusion.
Diego.
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 12:53, Pierre Vittet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to announce that I have been able to compile GCC while checking
> it with a simple MELT plugin that I have wrote. This plugin is integrated
> into GCC by using the MELT plugin. I guess this is the first successfull use
>
Hello,
I would like to announce that I have been able to compile GCC while
checking it with a simple MELT plugin that I have wrote. This plugin is
integrated into GCC by using the MELT plugin. I guess this is the first
successfull use of MELT with a huge real program like GCC.
For those who
On May 5, 2011, at 2:31 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 5 May 2011 18:52, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
>> ...
>> I support your suspiction. Linking to that stuff is harmful.
>
> Thanks for checking them, Sergei.
>
> Now I'm convinced Bohdan Zograf is a link farmer and should be ignored.
It sounds
On 5 May 2011 18:52, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Thu, 5 May 2011 16:28:34 +0100
> Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
>> On 5 May 2011 16:08, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
>> >> And either Google Translate is very very good at Belarusian, or the
>> >> pages this guy translates have just been piped through Go
On Thu, 5 May 2011 16:28:34 +0100
Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 5 May 2011 16:08, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> >> And either Google Translate is very very good at Belarusian, or the
> >> pages this guy translates have just been piped through Google
> >> Translate. They're identical.
> >
> > And I'm
On 5 May 2011 16:08, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
>> And either Google Translate is very very good at Belarusian, or the
>> pages this guy translates have just been piped through Google
>> Translate. They're identical.
>
> And I'm afraid worthless.
>
> Can you show me a link? I'm kinda Belarusian nat
> And either Google Translate is very very good at Belarusian, or the
> pages this guy translates have just been piped through Google
> Translate. They're identical.
And I'm afraid worthless.
Can you show me a link? I'm kinda Belarusian native speaker.
blog format is a bit suspicious to maintain
On 5 May 2011 10:56, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 5 May 2011 09:38, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 04/05/11 17:12, GM wrote:
>>
>>> I'm willing to translate publication located at http://gcc.gnu.org/java/
>>> to the Belorussian language (my mother tongue). What I'm asking for is
>>> your written permiss
On 5 May 2011 09:38, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 04/05/11 17:12, GM wrote:
>
>> I'm willing to translate publication located at http://gcc.gnu.org/java/
>> to the Belorussian language (my mother tongue). What I'm asking for is
>> your written permission, so you don't mind after I'll post the
>> trans
On 04/05/11 17:12, GM wrote:
> I'm willing to translate publication located at http://gcc.gnu.org/java/
> to the Belorussian language (my mother tongue). What I'm asking for is
> your written permission, so you don't mind after I'll post the
> translation to my blog. The translation is intended
24 matches
Mail list logo
