On 06/28/2012 08:39 PM, Rick Hodgin wrote:
>> Why do you want to bother with a non-standard,
>> unportable extension instead of just writing:
>>
>> inline bool isSystemClosed()
>> { return !isSystemOpen; }
>>
>> Which is simple, conventional, easy to understand
>> and portable.
>>
>> Or in C++ just
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I faced a problem with usage of force_gimple_operand function for
> specific tree. I have a TARGET_MEM_REF tree node whose address I want
> to pass as argument to the function call. I use build_fold_addr_expr
> to get address tree
Next problem: libiberty. This looks reasonably well in dvi and pdf.
OK? That should really be the last error.
Andreas.
* copying-lib.texi (Library Copying): Don't use @heading inside
@enumerate.
diff --git a/libiberty/copying-lib.texi b/libiberty/copying-lib.texi
index 79e1038.
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Next problem: libiberty. This looks reasonably well in dvi and pdf.
> OK? That should really be the last error.
>
> Andreas.
>
> * copying-lib.texi (Library Copying): Don't use @heading inside
> @enumerate.
Looks reasonable. Thanks, And
2012/6/29 Richard Guenther :
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I faced a problem with usage of force_gimple_operand function for
>> specific tree. I have a TARGET_MEM_REF tree node whose address I want
>> to pass as argument to the function call. I use build_f
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:39:16PM -0700, Rick Hodgin wrote:
> I've thought more about the syntax, and I see this making more sense:
> bool isSystemOpen[!isSystemClosed];
You've just declared an array of bool, whose size is the expression
!isSystemClosed.
As developers have already showed you ho
Merhaba, online ve ücretsiz olarak film izlemek isterseniz filmkutum.com her an
güncellenen içeriğiyle herzaman hizmetinizde.
Richi asked me to also report a gcc bug:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53808
> But that's pervasively true in C++ — the linker has to eliminate duplicates
> all the time. Idiomatic C++ code ends up plunking down hundreds, if
> not thousands, of inline functions in every single tran
On Jun 29, 2012, at 11:40 AM, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
>> But that's pervasively true in C++ — the linker has to eliminate duplicates
>> all the time. Idiomatic C++ code ends up plunking down hundreds, if
>> not thousands, of inline functions in every single translation unit. This is
>> already a
On Jun 28, 2012, at 3:19 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2012, Mike Stump wrote:
>> The next would be because it would be a speed hit to re-check at
>> runtime the qualities of the linker and do something different.
>
> But then, our testsuite *does* re-check at runtime, but without my
>
> There's no "for a long time" here. The ABI does not allow us to emit these
> symbols with non-coalescing linkage. We're not going to break ABI
> just because people didn't consider a particular code pattern when they
> hacked in devirtualization through external v-tables.
If we take "the ABI"
On Thu, 28 Jun 2012, Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:
> you may have thought I'd disappeared but here I am, after weeks of working on
> a small project of mine. What started as a very small hack for visualising
> callgrind's profiles is now an -experimental still- website, a GCC version of
> mozilla's "a
In theory we should be able to do multiple "LTO" passes. So we could do
a.c a.o
... -> -> WPA -> LTRANS and TM lowering -> WPA -> LTRANS and RTL
expand
x.c x.o
Thus, after a first wave of WPA and LTRANS in non-lowered TM we can,
after the TM lowering in the first LTR
Snapshot gcc-4.6-20120629 is now available on
ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/4.6-20120629/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 4.6 SVN branch
with the following options: svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/branches
On Jun 29, 2012, at 2:23 PM, Rafael Espíndola wrote:
>> There's no "for a long time" here. The ABI does not allow us to emit these
>> symbols with non-coalescing linkage. We're not going to break ABI
>> just because people didn't consider a particular code pattern when they
>> hacked in devirtual
15 matches
Mail list logo