Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com a écrit:
I've reverted or deleted all the spam I could find (and that you
hadn't already done) and have added lots of people to the EditorGroup
who had made good changes in the past.
Thank you for doing this. It's appreciated.
--
Dodji
For the RTEMS wiki, we require a 50 word bio and manually approve accounts. It
is effort to approve accounts but less than the spam clean up was.
It is sad either way.
--joel
Dodji Seketeli do...@seketeli.org wrote:
Jonathan Wakely jwakely@gmail.com a écrit:
I've reverted or deleted
Hi,
The help text for the --with-dwarf2 configure option says it forces
the default debug format to be DWARF 2. However, the built compiler
still produces DWARF 4, unless -gdwarf-2 is explicitly specified when
compiling.
I see that the darwin target gets around this by using the
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 01:42:18PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
The help text for the --with-dwarf2 configure option says it forces
the default debug format to be DWARF 2. However, the built compiler
still produces DWARF 4, unless -gdwarf-2 is explicitly specified when
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 10:23:24AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 01:42:18PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
The help text for the --with-dwarf2 configure option says it forces
the default debug format to be DWARF 2. However, the built compiler
still produces
Hi!
On Tue, 2013-08-20 11:24:31 +0400, Alexander Ivchenko aivch...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi, thanks for cathing this.
I certainly missed that OPTION_BIONIC is not defined for linux targets
that do not include config/linux.h in their tm.h.
This patch fixed build for powerpc64le-linux and
No need for the device and handler IMHO, each vector would correspond to
one function call (GOMP_target, GOMP_target_data or GOMP_target_update)
and all those calls would be called with device id.
Probably yes.
Let's talk about some concrete example (though, I see the gimplifier
doesn't
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 03:59:11PM +0400, Michael V. Zolotukhin wrote:
As I currently see it, the given code would be expanded to something like
this:
// Create two versions of V: for host and for target
int v;
int v_target __attribute(target);
// The same for TGT function
int
Actually, not two versions of those during the compilation, you have
just one v and one tgt, both have __attribute__((omp declare target))
on them (note, you can't specify that attribute manually).
And just when streaming into .gnu.target_lto_* sections you only stream
everything that has
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 05:29:36PM +0400, Michael V. Zolotukhin wrote:
Nope, there is only one target data pragma, so you would use here just:
struct data_descriptor data_desc2[2] = { ... };
GOMP_target (-1, bar.omp_fn.1, bar.omp_fn.1, data_desc2, 2);
This 'pragma target' is placed
Hi,
Here is a patch to extend x86-64 psABI to support MPX [1].
A short description of changes:
- There are 4 bound registers (bnd0-bnd3) added; all of them are caller-save
- When we pass (return) pointer on register, we use the next
available bound register to pass (return) bounds
- If there
On 08/26/13 01:40, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
It isn't any kind of workaround the above. Apple tools are simply so buggy
that they can't grok DWARF later than 2, crash in lots of ways on it.
Why do you want DWARF2 rather than DWARF3 or 4?
Same reason, some tools (proprietary debugger
peliculas
series de tv
recitales
discografias completas
juegos para todas las consolas
aplicaciones para todos los operativos
buscanos con el nombre xtop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58240
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to shiyan from comment #7)
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #4)
-fno-builtin (or some better such option)?
strncmp is a standard function, your code redefining
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58240
--- Comment #11 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to shiyan from comment #7)
Thank you for the suggestion. Yes, I know -fno-builtin can work around it. I
can think of many possible ways to work around itbut whatever,
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58240
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58242
Bug ID: 58242
Summary: [4.9 regression] linux-android.c:40:7: error:
'OPTION_BIONIC' was not declared in this scope breaks
bootstrap on powerpc64-linux
Product: gcc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58240
--- Comment #13 from shiyan shiyan2016 at 126 dot com ---
Hi all,
Thank you for all your explanation. This seems more like a philosophical
discussion :)
I do can understand what GCC is doing (as I mentioned, it may be optimized to
*s1-*s2).
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58242
Uroš Bizjak ubizjak at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aivchenk at gmail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58243
Bug ID: 58243
Summary: Suboptimal structure initialization with tree-sra
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58208
--- Comment #9 from Tammy Hsu tammy at Cadence dot COM ---
I tried to run the g++ build on RHEL 5.5 on a RHEL 6.3 system, import seg
fault.
I then tried to rebuild gcc481 on RHEL 6.3 and rerun the testcase, it still
crash.
The glibc on RHEL 6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35649
Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58244
Bug ID: 58244
Summary: global variable: many THOUSANDS times slower execution
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58244
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Why do you think this is a bug?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58244
--- Comment #2 from Martin Konôpka martin.konopka at stuba dot sk ---
It it is confirmed, it is a very serious performance issue. In my test the code
with the global declaration executed about 6 times slower than the code
with the local
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58244
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse glisse at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With auxval local, the compiler knows that computing suma, etc is useless and
removes all that code, including the calls to sin. So you would like the
compiler to do the same for a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58244
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
gcc was able to optimize your code to make it 6000 times faster. How is that a
regression?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58244
--- Comment #5 from Martin Konôpka martin.konopka at stuba dot sk ---
I do not fully understand the question. In both cases I used the same
optimisation (-O2). My other comment a while ago was lost. I must retype it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58208
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58244
--- Comment #6 from Martin Konôpka martin.konopka at stuba dot sk ---
(I am sorry that I do not understand internals of compilers.)
I first hit the issue in a bigger code having more than 11000 lines. First I
did not understand at all what is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58244
--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab sch...@linux-m68k.org ---
Now try the same code with -O0.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58208
--- Comment #11 from Tammy Hsu tammy at Cadence dot COM ---
Thank you. Yes, on the fedora 19 systems, I don't have these 3 i686 rpms
installed. I will add them.
Do you have any comments on the crash issue we have on CentOS 5.8 or RHEL
5.5/RHEL
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39057
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58153
--- Comment #5 from François Dumont fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org ---
And your remark is good too and will avoid me to spend some time on this idea.
Standard requirements regarding validity of iterators won't let us have
iterators invalidated because
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58244
--- Comment #8 from Martin Konôpka martin.konopka at stuba dot sk ---
Yes, I understand now. Thanks. The lines with the sin() functions were not
evaluated with the local declaration. My apologies for reporting the false bug.
I will try to close
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58238
--- Comment #2 from DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com ---
Please try the attached patch. I tested it with a simple #include stdint.h
but we made the type names exact matches (way back when) for a reason...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58238
DJ Delorie dj at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58245
Bug ID: 58245
Summary: -fstack-protector[-all] does not protect functions
that call noreturn functions
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58245
--- Comment #1 from Rich Felker bugdal at aerifal dot cx ---
One more thing: I would be happy with either of two solutions, either:
(1) Checking the canary before calling a noreturn function, just like
performing a check before a tail-call, or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58245
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The best solution: Don't use the same triplet as the GNU (glibc) one. Have
musl have its own triplet.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58245
--- Comment #3 from Rich Felker bugdal at aerifal dot cx ---
We already do that; the patch is in the musl-cross repo here:
https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-cross or
https://github.com/GregorR/musl-cross
However, we want the stack-protector
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58153
--- Comment #6 from Kenton Varda temporal at gmail dot com ---
Yep, I realize that erase_after would need to be added to the standard. I was
just speculating that it may be something the standard committee should
consider.
I've long since solved
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57927
Christian Widmer shadow at umbrox dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||shadow at
and above in
both 32-bit and 64-bit modes.
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 4.9.0 20130826 (experimental) [trunk revision 201986] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -O0 small.c
$ a.out
1
$ gcc-trunk -O1 small.c
$ a.out
0
$ gcc-4.8 -O1 small.c
$ a.out
0
$ gcc-4.7 -O1 small.c
$ a.out
0
$ gcc-4.6 -O1 small.c
$ a.out
0
. This is a regression from
4.8.x.
It is likely a duplicate of 57592, although the stack traces are somewhat
different.
$ gcc-trunk -v
gcc version 4.9.0 20130826 (experimental) [trunk revision 201986] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -O2 -c reduced.c
$ gcc-4.8 -O3 -c reduced.c
$ gcc-trunk -O3 -c reduced.c
reduced.c
On 08/25/2013 09:33 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Tue, 20 Aug 2013, Florian Weimer wrote:
As the libvtv reviewer, you don't need permission to commit your
changes. :-)
Actually, reviewers do need someone else's approval for their own
changes (unlike maintainers and of course not for trivial
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 05:33:50PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this problem was noticed by my verifier that binfo walks are not across type
hiearchy. ipa_intraprocedural_devirtualization is one remaining place where we
take class of object from OBJ_TYPE_REF_OBJECT instead of
On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 23:01 +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
[...]
In summary,
struct GTY(()) symtab_node_base
becomes:
class GTY((user)) symtab_node_base
and the subclasses:
struct GTY(()) cgraph_node
and:
struct GTY(()) varpool_node
become (respectively):
struct
Thank you for pointing out my error. I will commit the following patch.
-- Caroline Tice
cmt...@google.com
2013-08-26 Caroline Tice cmt...@google.com
* MAINTAINERS: Correct earliers update: Move myself from libvtv
Various Reviewers to libvtv Various Maintainers.
Index: MAINTAINERS
On Aug 26, 2013, at 8:21 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
My understanding of C++ One Definition Rule, in a strict sense, does not a
allow in to define two functions of the same name and different semantics in a
valid program . I also think that all DSOs eventually linked together or
Can you add missing documentation on functions like ...:get_count_info
-- documenting return value etc. Also it might be better to avoid
using 'set' as the local variable name. Change it to something more
specific.
thanks,
David
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Dehao Chen de...@google.com
On 08/26/2013 11:21 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Our default behaviour special case inline functions that are always
AVAIL_AVAILABLE and, via decl_replaceable_p, also any COMDAT (that may be for
functions since all COMDATs are also inlines, but makes difference for
variables I think).
Not all COMDAT
OK.
Jason
On 08/26/2013 03:57 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
While analyzing the relocations of libreoffice I noticed that I can play
the same game w/o LTO at linker level. Making those symbols hidden truns
external relocations to internal and should improve runtime, too: comdat
sharing by dynamic linker is
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/26/2013 11:21 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Our default behaviour special case inline functions that are always
AVAIL_AVAILABLE and, via decl_replaceable_p, also any COMDAT (that may be
for
functions since all COMDATs are
On 08/26/2013 10:45 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Hmm, let's not make it a default. Replacing global operator new (e.g. for
tracing purposes) is a valid C++ programming idiom.
Absolutely. What strikes me as vanishingly unlikely is the idea that
the replacement operator new would expose
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 8:17 PM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/26/2013 10:45 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Hmm, let's not make it a default. Replacing global operator new (e.g. for
tracing purposes) is a valid C++ programming idiom.
Absolutely. What strikes me as vanishingly
On 08/22/2013 09:19 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
- I tried to track functions that lead to terminate() and not mark them
as ECF_LEAF. This is because user can set handler. If the handler
can resonably expect the static vars defined in its unit to be
in the final form, we can not
Needed to build i586-pc-msdosdjgpp target, committed.
* config/i386/djgpp.h (ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME): New.
Index: config/i386/djgpp.h
===
--- config/i386/djgpp.h (revision 202015)
+++ config/i386/djgpp.h (working copy)
On 29/07/2013, at 10:03 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
While verifying license compliance for GCC and its libraries I noticed that
several libgcc files that end up in the final library are licensed under
GPL-3.0+ instead of GPL-3.0-with-GCC-exception.
This is, obviously, was not the intention
PING!
This issue is really important. It does not only affect bitfields but all kinds
of packed structures.
Starting from gcc 4.6.0 there is not a single released version that handles the
packed structures
correctly.
So could some one please approve Sandra's patch now?
Thanks
Bernd.
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 10:40:30PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
On Aug 25, 2013, at 8:32 PM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote:
We (IBM) don't intend to support running both big and little-endian
processes on the same system in the near future. Perhaps I'm jumping
the gun in defining the
On Aug 23, 2013, at 9:36 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
wrote:
You made a statement. It was not clear whether it was what you want
or whether it is what the standards mandate.
Both.
(2) what you believe the standards mandate, with appropriate quote; and
The life of
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net wrote:
but I fear you won't understand this and how it applies.
You must be right. I cannot match the entertaining value of your
message, so you win.
-- Gaby
Same topic as patch 17/n. For more expressing printers.
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to mainline.
-- Gaby
2013-08-26 Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net
c-family/
* c-pretty-print.h (c_pretty_printer::unary_expression): Now a
virtual member function.
Hello!
2013-08-26 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_debug_options): Remove prototype.
(x86_64_elf_select_section): Ditto.
(ix86_handle_tm_regparm_attribute): Remove ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED on used
arguments.
(ix86_pass_by_reference): Ditto.
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:04:42AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
static bool
-ix86_return_in_memory (const_tree type, const_tree fntype ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+ix86_return_in_memory (const_tree type, const_tree fntype)
{
#ifdef SUBTARGET_RETURN_IN_MEMORY
return SUBTARGET_RETURN_IN_MEMORY (type,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 11:04:42AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
static bool
-ix86_return_in_memory (const_tree type, const_tree fntype ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
+ix86_return_in_memory (const_tree type, const_tree fntype)
{
Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com writes:
| Hi Gaby.
|
| On 08/26/2013 10:42 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| Same topic as patch 17/n. For more expressing printers.
| Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux. Applied to mainline.
| Just got this:
|
|
Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com writes:
| Hi Gaby,
|
| bootstrap is currently broken:
|
| /scratch/Gcc/svn-dirs/trunk/gcc/c/c-objc-common.c: In function ‘bool
| c_tree_printer(pretty_printer*, text_info*, const char*, int, bool,
| bool, bool)’:
|
On 08/26/2013 11:20 AM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
You need more than that. The rest of patch is in trunk now.
Sorry for the breakage -- as you probably guessed, I specified only
c-family directory on the commit command line.
Thanks!
Paolo.
at revision 201992.
There were conflicts with the recent pretty printing patches.
Fixed. (Mostly due to the new concept-specific nodes printing.)
Modulo the asan stuff.
-- Gaby
2013-08-23 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
* ipa-prop.h (ipa_pass_through_data): New field type_preserved.
(ipa_ancestor_jf_data): Likewise.
(ipa_get_jf_pass_through_agg_preserved): Fix comment typo.
(ipa_get_jf_pass_through_type_preserved): New function.
I noticed I forgot to apply this old patch, already acked by Jason.
It introduces new pointer_sized_int_node, thus we can get rid of
uptr_type function in ubsan, and it allows us to do some clean-up
in asan.c, too.
Tested x86_64-linux, applying to ubsan branch.
2013-08-26 Marek Polacek
bootstrap for i686-pc-linux-gnu was failing with:
/ssd/fsf/boot-201992/./prev-gcc/xg++
-B/ssd/fsf/boot-201992/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/local/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/
-nostdinc++
-B/ssd/fsf/boot-201992/prev-i686-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs
Hi Mikael,
the SIZEOF intrinsic currently returns the size according to the
*declared* type for polymorphic variables. I think this doesn't really
make much sense and it also causes ICEs when SIZEOF is called on
CLASS(*) variables (which don't really have a declared type).
Therefore I'm
Hi,
by making speculative indirect call machinery to be used by ipa-devirt I put it
on
wild on firefox converting about 30% of all polymorphic calls in the progrma
(3).
This has provoked some issues I missed previously this patch fixes:
1) dumping - we no longer do only indirect calls from
The gcc.dg/fixed-point/convert-accum-neg.c execution test fails for avr
because for fractional integer to accumulator / integer conversions,
the avr target rounds towards -infinity, whereas we are supposed to round
towards 0.
The attached patch implements rounding towards 0, and adds an option
Hi,
I've added references to fxsr, xsave and xsaveopt options and builtins
to doc/[invoke,extend].texi.
Is it OK?
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 29a30ee..3aad294 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2013-08-23 Alexander Ivchenko
fixed fits_uhwi_p.
tested on x86-64.
kenny
Index: gcc/wide-int.h
===
--- gcc/wide-int.h (revision 201985)
+++ gcc/wide-int.h (working copy)
@@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ wide_int_ro::fits_shwi_p () const
inline bool
Hi,
it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit with
-fdump-tree-all
because the compiler eventually runs out of memory. I think it is one of your
patches
introducing serious memory leak. Can you, please, take a look on this? It
makes my life
harder - it is not fun to
Le 26/08/2013 13:22, Janus Weil a écrit :
Hi Mikael,
the SIZEOF intrinsic currently returns the size according to the
*declared* type for polymorphic variables. I think this doesn't really
make much sense and it also causes ICEs when SIZEOF is called on
CLASS(*) variables (which don't
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit with
-fdump-tree-all
because the compiler eventually runs out of memory. I think it is one of
your patches
introducing serious memory leak. Can you,
On 08/26/2013 01:16 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
PING!
This issue is really important. It does not only affect bitfields but
all kinds of packed structures.
Starting from gcc 4.6.0 there is not a single released version that
handles the packed structures correctly.
So could some one please
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit with
-fdump-tree-all
because the compiler eventually runs out of memory. I think it is one of
your patches
introducing serious memory leak.
On 08/22/2013 12:45 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
If the user-supplied operator new returns a, then it must
also ensure that 'a' is not used anywhere else -- e.g. I you can't
do lvalue-to-value conversion on 'a' to see what is written there.
Because its storage has been reused. That is, aliasing
Ping
2013/8/19 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Ping
2013/8/12 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
2013/8/10 Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com:
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
Here is updated version of the patch. I removed redundant
mode_for_bound, added
I'm slightly inclined to kindly invite the user to switch to
STORAGE_SIZE+SIZE instead. Any other opinion?
Since the SIZEOF intrinsic has been around for some time in gfortran
(before STORAGE_SIZE was available), I would say we should at least
continue to support it for backward
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit with
-fdump-tree-all
because the compiler eventually runs out of memory. I think
On 08/24/2013 02:33 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
* passes.c (register_pass): Add overload.
* tree-pass.h (register_pass): Forward declare it.
Add comment.
Ok.
r~
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit
with -fdump-tree-all
because the compiler eventually runs out of memory. I
On 08/22/2013 12:45 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
If the user-supplied operator new returns a, then it must
also ensure that 'a' is not used anywhere else -- e.g. I you can't
do lvalue-to-value conversion on 'a' to see what is written there.
Because its storage has been reused. That is,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On 08/22/2013 12:45 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
If the user-supplied operator new returns a, then it must
also ensure that 'a' is not used anywhere else -- e.g. I you can't
do lvalue-to-value conversion on 'a' to see what is
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 7:24 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi,
it seems to be couple weeks I am not able to compile big ltrans unit
with
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/22/2013 12:45 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
If the user-supplied operator new returns a, then it must
also ensure that 'a' is not used anywhere else -- e.g. I you can't
do lvalue-to-value conversion on 'a' to see what
This patch fixes the gcc.dg/c99-stdint-5.c and gcc.dg/c99-stdint-6.c
excess error
failures.
Tested for atmega128-sim.
OK to apply?
2013-05-26 Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com
* config/avr/avr-stdint.h (INT16_TYPE): Change default to int.
(UINT16_TYPE): Change
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
modify ALL_LINKERFLAGS or BUILD_LINKERFLAGS?
configure --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto . You need plugin enabled
buinutils for that.
I think there however should be a lot easier way to reproduce it by just
dropping some
Joern Rennecke wrote:
2013-05-02 Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com
* reload.c (find_valid_class): Allow classes that do not include
FIRST_PSEUDO_REGISTER - 1.
This is OK.
Thanks,
Ulrich
--
Dr. Ulrich Weigand
GNU/Linux compilers and toolchain
Hi,
cgraph_function_body_availability determine if body of a given function is
available in current compilation unit and if so, if it may be overwritten by
completely different semantic by (dynamic)linker. Function that is
AVAIL_AVAILABLE can still be repleaced by a function fron different unit,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Jan Hubicka hubi...@ucw.cz wrote:
modify ALL_LINKERFLAGS or BUILD_LINKERFLAGS?
configure --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto . You need plugin enabled
buinutils for that.
I think there however should be a lot easier way to reproduce it by just
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
