Re: broken link (and other issues) on the _contribute.html_ page

On Fri, 10 May 2013, Zvi Gilboa wrote: > On the _/contribute/.html_//page (http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html), the > link to the script that should help check conformance with GNU coding style is > broken (the root "trunk" is unknown, etc.) Thanks for the report, Zvi. I fixed this by means of th

Re: Broken links

Hi Odne, On Sun, 17 Jun 2012, Odne Hellebø wrote: > Just wanted to report that these links on your page are broken: > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/libstdc++/manual/ > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.1/libstdc++/api/ > > With their pdf, xml and html tarball links. > > I noticed b

Re: Problems with references in documentation

On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Georg-Johann Lay wrote: > Trying to document some new options/name spaces, I ran into following > problem with hyperlinking inside the document. > > It's best explained with an example from documentation: > > Start at > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Variable-Attribute

Re: Broken link Extended-asm-with-goto.html#Extended-asm-with-goto in online HTML documentation

Hi Stephan, On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > the link of "Extended asm with goto" is > > > > to a non-existing > > > > which gets redirected as > > > > to a URL with non-matchi

Re: Broken link in gcc-4.8/changes.html

Hi Paolo, On Wed, 12 Dec 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote: > I just noticed a broken link (in case the issue is trivial I may get > around to fixing it myself, but at the moment I don't know): > > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/X86-Built-in-Functions.html#X86-Built-in-Functions > > (it appers twice

Re: [doc] Fixing reference inside Extended-Asm.html

On Wed, 20 Nov 2013, Patrick Marlier wrote: > I have noticed that the link > Extended-asm-with-goto.html#Extended-asm-with-goto is wrong in > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html. > Locally when I generate the html doc, the link is good, ie href="#Extended-asm-with-goto">. I had a

Re: [buildrobot] First results of running contrib/config-list.mk

On Mon, 2 Dec 2013, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > On Mon, 2013-12-02 12:08:25 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > > I think it's time to remove targets that have been under > > > --enable-obsolete > > > for a while - and to obsolete, for possible future

Re: Broken links to libstdc++ docs

On 2 December 2013 02:29, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Hi Jonathan, > > On Sat, 8 Jun 2013, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> Once again the links from http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/ to the >> libstdc++ docs don't work: >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.6.4/libstdc++/manual/ >> http://gcc.gnu.org/online

Re: Hmmm, I think we've seen this problem before (lto build):

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Toon Moene wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-12/msg1.html > > FAILED: Bootstrap (build config: lto; languages: fortran; trunk revision > 205557) on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu > > In function 'release', > inlined from 'release' at /home/toon/

Re: wide-int compile time: state of play

On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote: > FWIW, here are some numbers comparing the times various > --enable-checking=release versions of cc1plus take to compile > a set of .ii inputs at -O2. The versions are: > > (a) wide-int r205263, where the last merge was made > (b) current

Re: [buildrobot] First results of running contrib/config-list.mk

On Mon, 2013-12-02 12:08:25 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > > I think it's time to remove targets that have been under --enable-obsolete > > for a while - and to obsolete, for possible future removal, targets > > without stdint.h type information conf

Re: [buildrobot] First results of running contrib/config-list.mk

On Tue, 26 Nov 2013, Joseph S. Myers wrote: > I think it's time to remove targets that have been under --enable-obsolete > for a while - and to obsolete, for possible future removal, targets > without stdint.h type information configured in GCC (see list in >