Hello!
As I stated on other emails I'm writing a backend. I'm facing a
problem regarding register modes.
The thing is: I don't know how to handle non-SI modes. I've read many
backends for different arches but I don't really get it, sorry.
In my case I've started with a x86 backend. This arch has
Yep thanks,
As you guys pointed the problem was the improper handling of the
strict_p parameter.
Thanks!
2014-03-18 20:13 GMT+01:00 Richard Sandiford :
> Richard Sandiford writes:
>> What DJ meant below was that you should reject all pseudo registers
>> if strict_p. I.e. REG_P (foo) should be:
On 03/14/2014 09:18 PM, Roman Gareev wrote:
Dear gcc contributors,
I am going to try to participate in Google Summer of Code 2014. My project
is "Integration of ISL code generator into Graphite".
My proposal can be found at on the following link
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2Wloo-931AoTWlk
Hi Ilmir!
On Wed, 19 Mar 2014 19:02:11 +0400, Ilmir Usmanov wrote:
> My name is Ilmir Usmanov and I'm a student of Moscow Institute of Physics and
> Technology.
> Also I'm implementing OpenACC 1.0 in gomp4 branch as an employee of Samsung
> R&D Institute Russia (SRR). My research interests are
On Mar 20, 2014, at 4:02 AM, Ilmir Usmanov wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> My name is Ilmir Usmanov and I'm a student of Moscow Institute of Physics and
> Technology.
> Also I'm implementing OpenACC 1.0 in gomp4 branch as an employee of Samsung
> R&D Institute Russia (SRR). My research interests are conn
Hi
I tracked down a bug in building v850-rtems to a place in libgcc/config.host
where the code setting tmake_file did not append, it overwrote the previous
value. This caused v850-rtems to throw away the previous setting which
adding the newlib/sys/rtems/* directories to the include path.
diff --
> -Original Message-
> From: David Brown [mailto:da...@westcontrol.com]
> Sent: 19 March 2014 15:47
> To: Paulo Matos; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: returning short-enum and truncate doesn't trigger
> conversion warning
>
>
> Usually the discovery of bugs gets discussed on the help lis
On 19/03/14 15:55, Paulo Matos wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: David Brown [mailto:da...@westcontrol.com]
>> Sent: 19 March 2014 14:44
>> To: Paulo Matos; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: returning short-enum and truncate doesn't trigger
>> conversion warning
>>
>> On 19/03/14 15
Hi all!
My name is Ilmir Usmanov and I'm a student of Moscow Institute of Physics and
Technology.
Also I'm implementing OpenACC 1.0 in gomp4 branch as an employee of Samsung R&D
Institute Russia (SRR). My research interests are connected with creating
OpenCL Code Generator. So I'd like to parti
> -Original Message-
> From: David Brown [mailto:da...@westcontrol.com]
> Sent: 19 March 2014 14:44
> To: Paulo Matos; gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: returning short-enum and truncate doesn't trigger
> conversion warning
>
> On 19/03/14 15:33, Paulo Matos wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > This
On 19/03/14 15:33, Paulo Matos wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is either a C standard subtlety or a bug in GCC.
This is perfectly normal behaviour for C, and not a bug. It is also a
topic for the gcc help list, rather than the development list.
> For example:
> unsigned short foo (unsigned int a)
> {
Hi all,
This is either a C standard subtlety or a bug in GCC.
For example:
unsigned short foo (unsigned int a)
{
return a;
}
enum xpto
{
A = 0,
B = 1,
X = 512
};
extern void print (unsigned int);
unsigned char bar (enum xpto a)
{
print (sizeof (unsigned char));
print (sizeof (enum x
On 03/19/2014 05:08 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
[ I foolishly sent this with the document as an attachment... hopefully it
gets
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 9:04 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> wrote:
>>> In c_expr::c_expr, shouldn't OP_C_EXPR be passed to operand
>>> constructor instead of OP_EXPR ?
>>
>> Inde
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 5:27 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>>> [ I foolishly sent this with the document as an attachment... hopefully it
>>> gets rejected and anyone interested can s
15 matches
Mail list logo
