On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 19:50 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>>
>> > Do you know which pass does the simple
>> > '(float)function((double)float_val)' demotion? Maybe that would be a
>> > good place to
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 03:55:34PM -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-10-09 at 19:50 +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> >
> > > Do you know which pass does the simple
> > > '(float)function((double)float_val)' demotion? Maybe that would be a
> > > g
On Thu, Oct 09, 2014 at 02:34:51PM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2014, at 2:07 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > I'd like to kick off a discussion about moving the default standard
> > for C from gnu89 to gnu11.
>
> I endorse the change of default.
Thanks for chiming in.
> A wiki page that h
On 2014-10-10 11:07:52 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Though, is such optimization desirable even for fast-math?
I wonder whether fast-math has a well-defined spec, but it should be
noted that because of possible cancellations, even if the final result
is a float, it may be better to keep intermedi
Hi,
could anyone clarify about predicated code motion in lim?
After reading a TODO in /tree-ssa-loop-im.c (see [1]) I tried several
examples, say [2]. However, in all of them the code was moved out of
the loop successfully (either by pre or by lim, as in [2]).
So my question is: what the author o
Hi Jakub,
On 15 September 2014 18:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
[...]
> # For parallelized check-% targets, this decides whether parallelization
> # is desirable (if -jN is used and RUNTESTFLAGS doesn't contain anything
> # but optional --target_board or --extra_opts arguments). If desirable,
>
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Evgeniya Maenkova
wrote:
> Hi,
> could anyone clarify about predicated code motion in lim?
>
> After reading a TODO in /tree-ssa-loop-im.c (see [1]) I tried several
> examples, say [2]. However, in all of them the code was moved out of
> the loop successfully (eith
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 04:09:39PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> my.exp contains the following construct which is often used in the testsuite:
> ==
> foreach src [lsort [glob -nocomplain $srcdir/$subdir/*.c]] {
> # If we're only testing specific files and this isn't one of them,
> ski
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> On 2014-10-10 11:07:52 +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> Though, is such optimization desirable even for fast-math?
>
> I wonder whether fast-math has a well-defined spec, but it should be
> noted that because of possible cancellations, even i
On 10 October 2014 16:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 04:09:39PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> my.exp contains the following construct which is often used in the testsuite:
>> ==
>> foreach src [lsort [glob -nocomplain $srcdir/$subdir/*.c]] {
>> # If we're only te
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 04:50:47PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 10 October 2014 16:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 04:09:39PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >> my.exp contains the following construct which is often used in the
> >> testsuite:
> >> ==
> >> forea
On 10/09/14 06:14, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
I'd like to bring PR 63475 to the attention of RTL maintainers. The
problem in the referred PR exposed the RTL infrastructure problem,
where VALUE expressions are leaked instead of MEM expresions into
various parts of aliasing-detecting support functi
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/09/14 06:14, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'd like to bring PR 63475 to the attention of RTL maintainers. The
>> problem in the referred PR exposed the RTL infrastructure problem,
>> where VALUE expressions are leaked instead of MEM
On 10/10/14 12:12, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 7:56 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/09/14 06:14, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
I'd like to bring PR 63475 to the attention of RTL maintainers. The
problem in the referred PR exposed the RTL infrastructure problem,
where VALUE expressions a
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:18 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
I'd like to bring PR 63475 to the attention of RTL maintainers. The
problem in the referred PR exposed the RTL infrastructure problem,
where VALUE expressions are leaked instead of MEM expresions into
various parts of aliasing-d
Got it, thanks.
(Now there are phi instead of if)
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Evgeniya Maenkova
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> could anyone clarify about predicated code motion in lim?
>>
>> After reading a TODO in /tree-ssa-loop-im.c (see [1])
Hi,
Am Robin Mullane, Cheif operating officer of Standard Bank, Please permit me to
discuss an inheritance deal connected to your second name. Reply to:
robinmulla...@gmail.com if interested for more details.
17 matches
Mail list logo
