GCC 6.0 Status Report (2015-04-13)

2015-04-13 Thread Jakub Jelinek
Status == The trunk has branched for the GCC 5 release and is now open again for general development, stage 1. Please consider not disrupting it too much during the RC phase of GCC 5 so it is possible to test important fixes for 5.1 on it. Quality Data Priority # Cha

About adding OMPT into GNU's libgomp

2015-04-13 Thread Harald Servat
Dear list, we're considering in adding OMPT [1] into the GNU OpenMP runtime. In brief, OMPT is a specification of an API for performance analysis tools such as TAU, Extrae and HPCToolkit. It mainly consists of calls that allow querying the state of the threads and callbacks to notify a tool of v

Re: About adding OMPT into GNU's libgomp

2015-04-13 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 13 April 2015 at 10:14, Harald Servat wrote: > Before we start, we'd like to know if there is someone else working > on this direction. And if so, could we cooperate? I have no idea about this part of your mail. > If there's nobody working on that, how should we start? According to > the G

Re: About adding OMPT into GNU's libgomp

2015-04-13 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 11:14:56AM +0200, Harald Servat wrote: > we're considering in adding OMPT [1] into the GNU OpenMP runtime. In > brief, OMPT is a specification of an API for performance analysis > tools such as TAU, Extrae and HPCToolkit. It mainly consists of calls > that allow querying t

Re: lto bootstrap fails.

2015-04-13 Thread Toon Moene
On 04/11/2015 01:33 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:18:39AM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote: On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 03:59:19PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote: Like this: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-04/msg01086.html ODR rears its head again ... huh, why is c/c-lan

Re: lto bootstrap fails.

2015-04-13 Thread Trevor Saunders
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:46:35PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote: > On 04/11/2015 01:33 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > >>On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:18:39AM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote: > >>>On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 03:59:19PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote: > Like this: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-

Re: lto bootstrap fails.

2015-04-13 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:46:35PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote: > [ Patch elided ] > > The patch applied cleanly - this is what I got as a result: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-04/msg01450.html > > I hope this is useful. Looks like the http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-08/msg

Re: xtensa PR65730

2015-04-13 Thread augustine.sterl...@gmail.com
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 12:43 AM, Max Filippov wrote: > On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 2:16 AM, augustine.sterl...@gmail.com > wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Max Filippov wrote: >>> How can we have a mulsi3 pattern that don't get expanded until it's >>> optimized, and only gets expanded to

Re: lto bootstrap fails.

2015-04-13 Thread Toon Moene
On 04/13/2015 06:00 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote: On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 05:46:35PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote: On 04/11/2015 01:33 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote: On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 11:18:39AM -0400, Trevor Saunders wrote: On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 03:59:19PM +0200, Toon Moene wrote: Like this: https

Dejagnu-fu/pex-fu/diagnostics-fu needed to get LTO warnings right

2015-04-13 Thread Jan Hubicka
> > The patch applied cleanly - this is what I got as a result: > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-04/msg01450.html > > > > I hope this is useful. > > ok, so the problem would seem to be graphite-scop-detection.c is > including front end specific headers. Can you put a #error i

is it time to mass change from .c to .cc in gcc/ ?

2015-04-13 Thread Trevor Saunders
Hi! To be clear I only want to talk about gcc/**/*.c but *not* testsuite/ The Question of changing from .c to a more standard C++ file extension has come up a couple times. I believe its reasonable accurate to say the consensus is moderately in favor of doing this at some point. The biggest con

Re: [gcc libcc1] build_qualified_type for self-referencing/incomplete types

2015-04-13 Thread Jan Kratochvil
On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:31:45 +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > What is the recommended fix? I expect pointer to a declaration / opaque type > which gets completed only when one references the 'p' field later? It looks as it got fixed by: -plugin_build_record_type (cc1_plugin::connection *self) +plu

Re: GCC 6.0 Status Report (2015-04-13)

2015-04-13 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
Hi Jakub, On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > Priority # Change from last report > --- --- > P14- 3 > P2 80+ 10 > P39+- 0 > P4 84+ 4 > P5 35- 1

Connecting to gcc.gnu.org - keygen_fail

2015-04-13 Thread jimd
Hi, If I try to browse to pages like http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/segfault.html I get the following Mozilla alert: > >An error occurred during a connection to gcc.gnu.org:443. Unable to generate >public/private key pair. (Error code: sec_error_keygen_fail) > I suspect this is because somebody ch

Re: GCC 6.0 Status Report (2015-04-13)

2015-04-13 Thread Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 08:25:58AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > Hi Jakub, > > On Mon, 13 Apr 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > Priority # Change from last report > > --- --- > > P14- 3 > > P2 80+ 10 > > P3