Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com writes:
gcc/
* configure.ac: Add check for aarch64 assembler -fpic relocation
modifier support.
* configure: Regenerate.
* config.in: Regenerate.
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (initialize_aarch64_code_model): Fall back to
-fPIC if not support of -fpic
On Jun 30, 2015, at 6:54 AM, Kugan kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org wrote:
On 29/06/15 21:56, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On Jun 28, 2015, at 2:28 PM, Kugan kugan.vivekanandara...@linaro.org
wrote:
This patch allows setting REG_EQUAL for ZERO_EXTRACT and handle that in
cse (where the src
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 6:08 PM, Maciej W. Rozycki ma...@linux-mips.org wrote:
Richard, please have a look at my question below in a reference to your
previous statement.
On Thu, 18 Jun 2015, Steve Ellcey wrote:
OK, I checked in the prequel patch and here is a new copy of the
original patch
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/01/2015 04:55 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:11 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
wrote:
(only commenting on the technique, not on the transformation itself)
+(simplify
+ (cond @0 (convert @1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66652
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Bug ID: 66701
Summary: __cxxabiv1::__cxa_pure_virtual - can it take an
argument of the pointer to the function that was
called, please?
Product: gcc
Version:
On 29/06/15 19:58, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/29/2015 08:24 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch fixes PR66652.
It uses max_loop_iterations in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt to
ensure that the new loop bound nit + 1 doesn't overflow.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64.
OK for trunk?
I notice the way gcc_assert() is defined in system.h now, the test won't
disappear even when runtime checks are disabled, though you might still
adjust it to avoid any programmer confusion.
It will disappear at run time, see the definition:
/* Include EXPR, so that unused variable warnings do
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 09:36:59AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Anything wrong with this?
+/* X - (X / Y) * Y is the same as X % Y. */
+(simplify
+ (minus (convert? @0) (convert? (mult
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:11 AM, Tobias Grosser tob...@grosser.es wrote:
On 06/30/2015 02:09 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Aditya Kumar hiradi...@msn.com wrote:
In this patch we discard the scops where entry and exit are the same BB.
This is an effort to remove
Andreas Schwab writes:
Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com writes:
gcc/
* configure.ac: Add check for aarch64 assembler -fpic relocation
modifier support.
* configure: Regenerate.
* config.in: Regenerate.
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (initialize_aarch64_code_model): Fall back to
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 8:12 AM, Tobias Grosser tob...@grosser.es wrote:
On 06/30/2015 02:12 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Aditya Kumar hiradi...@msn.com wrote:
No regressions.
2015-06-29 Aditya Kumar aditya...@samsung.com
Sebastian Pop
All:
The below patch added a new path Splitting optimization pass on SSA
representation. The Path Splitting optimization
Pass moves the join block of if-then-else same as loop latch to its
predecessors and get merged with the predecessors
Preserving the SSA representation.
The patch is tested
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66678
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35878
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35878action=edit
tentative patch
Hi Jiong,
It seems to me that you committed patches 1/N, 2/N and 3/N as only 1
commit (rev 225121).
Am I right?
On 26 June 2015 at 16:39, Marcus Shawcroft marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 May 2015 at 12:21, Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com wrote:
Add new unspec name UNSPEC_TLSLE, use it
This improves VRP for cases of
x = (T) y;
if (y !=/== CST)
{
... use of X
to insert asserts for X similar to how we handle x = y +- CST.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2015-06-30 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
* tree-vrp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66652
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 30 08:35:57 2015
New Revision: 225162
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225162root=gccview=rev
Log:
Use max_loop_iterations in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66678
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #2)
Created attachment 35878 [details]
tentative patch
That single-use case is awfully special ... just add an unrelated use
to the function and
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
This moves a simple optimization. Here it's plain to see how :c
removes the need to duplicate code to handle commutativity.
Note that the same transformation would work for plus and xor.
I put some more converts into the pattern, but then it's
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 4:31 AM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 5:13 AM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/26/2015 03:02 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
Hi,
GCC avoids multi-pointers/dangling-pointers of struct iv by allocating
multiple copies of the structure. This
This moves a simple optimization. Here it's plain to see how :c
removes the need to duplicate code to handle commutativity.
I put some more converts into the pattern, but then it's turned
out that I also need the tree_nop_conversion_p (otherwise we'd
regress binop-notor2.c that uses booleans).
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
This moves a simple optimization. Here it's plain to see how :c
removes the need to duplicate code to handle commutativity.
I put some more converts into the pattern, but then it's turned
out that I also need the tree_nop_conversion_p (otherwise
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64833
--- Comment #21 from Kazumoto Kojima kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kkojima
Date: Wed Jul 1 01:02:48 2015
New Revision: 225219
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225219root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR target/64833
* [SH] Set length of
The attached patch is to fix PR target/64833 which is a 4.9/5/6
regression. The target reorg may replace casesi_worker_1 insn
with casesi_worker_2 with a temporary wrong length for PIC.
It can result the wrong position of the constant pool. See PR
target/64833 for details.
The patch set the
On 06/30/2015 03:46 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
On 06/28/2015 04:15 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
For bfin looping optimization, after lsetup optimization, it can have
the correct lsetup related insns which causes gcc_assert for jump_insn.
I've been debugging this for a bit, and at least the explanation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely redi at gcc dot gnu.org ---
But this isn't the place to propose changes to the ABI, because it's used by
several different compilers and if G++ started emitting a call to a different
version of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66618
--- Comment #3 from Keith Thompson Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com ---
It would be easier to argue that gcc accepts other forms of constant
expressions if (a) those other forms were documented and (b) they were
accepted at all optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66686
--- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Wed Jul 1 01:07:35 2015
New Revision: 225220
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225220root=gccview=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/66686 (dependent template template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66563
--- Comment #41 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz glaubitz at physik dot
fu-berlin.de ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #40)
with my 4.9 native compiler built with 4.9 cross compiler for svn
gcc-4_9-branch. I hope that miscompilation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66703
Bug ID: 66703
Summary: [4.9] gcc.target/i386/readeflags-1.c aborts on
-march=i586
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 30 12:16:01 2015
New Revision: 225180
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225180root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66702
* omp-low.c
I forgot to attach the Link of the RFC comments from Jeff for reference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2015-05/msg00302.html
Thanks Regards
Ajit
-Original Message-
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] On
Behalf Of Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Sent: Tuesday,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 30 12:52:55 2015
New Revision: 225182
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225182root=gccview=rev
Log:
2015-06-30 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:47:49PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 01:39:29PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
Does my suggestion to build the all_ones constant in TREE_TYPE (@0) and
convert that to type help for that?
It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Jun 30 12:12:42 2015
New Revision: 225179
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225179root=gccview=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/66702
* omp-low.c
Dear All,
Please find attached the latest version of the submodule patch. You
might note that the number of the patch has been incremented by two.
The intermediate version went to Reinhold Bader and co for testing.
The main improvements in this version are:
(i) As reported by Reinhold, the
On 2015-06-30 11:24, Eric Botcazou wrote:
The UT699 is a leon3r0 system which does not support CASA. However, to
enable the errata fixes for UT699 with -mfix-ut699 requires the CPU
target to be leon3.
-mfix-ut699 itself is independent of the processor and doesn't require leon3.
The
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 01:39:29PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
Does my suggestion to build the all_ones constant in TREE_TYPE (@0) and
convert that to type help for that?
It appears to work, but it seems weird to me to create a integer constant
in one type and then immediately cast it to another
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 01:39:29PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
Does my suggestion to build the all_ones constant in TREE_TYPE (@0) and
convert that to type help for that?
It appears to work, but it seems weird to me to create a integer constant
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
===
--- gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c (revision 225163)
+++ gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
On 29/06/15 18:57 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Actually, an unexpected libstdc++-v3/configure change is introduced by some
inconsistency in https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisionrevision=223196
where acinclude.m4 contains different code than the recreated configure:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 03:19:30PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
--- a/libgomp/target.c
+++ b/libgomp/target.c
@@ -580,10 +581,16 @@ gomp_unmap_vars (struct target_mem_desc *tgt, bool
do_copyfrom)
bool do_unmap = false;
if (k-refcount 1)
k-refcount--;
- else if
On 15/06/15 18:36, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch:
- sets DEFAULT_CFLAGS to -O2, if not set otherwise
(similar to what is done in c.exp)
- removes superfluous dg-options -O2 settings.
- removes superfluous dg-options -fopenmp settings.
- uses dg-additional-options for -std=standard
This short-cuts re-simplifying (convert ...)s which often are no-ops
because a conditional convert didn't match. So instead of throwing
the whole match-and-simplify machinery on such converts and yell
out that match.pd:961 triggered (that really happens often...) the
following simply does
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 4:42 PM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal
Cc: l...@redhat.com; GCC Patches; Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli
Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: [Patch,tree-optimization]: Add
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 06:36:17PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
this patch:
- sets DEFAULT_CFLAGS to -O2, if not set otherwise
(similar to what is done in c.exp)
- removes superfluous dg-options -O2 settings.
- removes superfluous dg-options -fopenmp settings.
- uses
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
Bug ID: 66704
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in tree-vectorizer at
tree-ssanames.c:457
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Hi!
This patch implements GOMP_target_enter_exit_data in libgomp, also it fixes a
bug in gomp_map_vars_existing.
make check-target-libgomp passed.
However, I am afraid that there may be some hard-to-find issues (like memory
leaks) in cases of mixed (structured+unstructured) data mappings...
OK
Hi!
As the first testcase shows, we were mishandling addressable uniform/linear
parameters, in that case keeping them to use the (D) ssa name for uniform
or doing the iteration for linear doesn't work, so we need to handle it
slightly differently.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66702
Jakub Jelinek jakub at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
Bug ID: 66705
Summary: [5/6 Regression] section is missing linker error with
-flto -fipa-pta
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66704
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Committed as obvious.
Richard.
2015-06-30 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/66704
* tree-vect-data-refs.c (vect_setup_realignment): Use
make_ssa_name for non-SSA name source.
Index: gcc/tree-vect-data-refs.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66136
--- Comment #14 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: nsz
Date: Tue Jun 30 10:07:03 2015
New Revision: 225170
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225170root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport of r224031 from mainline
2015-06-29 Szabolcs Nagy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65686
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65779
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:08:35AM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
This moves a simple optimization. Here it's plain to see how :c
removes the need to duplicate code to handle commutativity.
Note that the same transformation would work for plus and xor.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65821
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
On June 30, 2015 10:46:21 AM GMT+02:00, Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
wrote:
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-ior-2.c
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/fold-ior-2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options -O -fdump-tree-cddce1 } */
+
+int
+fn1 (int x)
+{
+ return ~x | x;
+}
+
+int
On June 30, 2015 10:16:01 AM GMT+02:00, Ajit Kumar Agarwal
ajit.kumar.agar...@xilinx.com wrote:
All:
The below patch added a new path Splitting optimization pass on SSA
representation. The Path Splitting optimization
Pass moves the join block of if-then-else same as loop latch to its
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:08:35AM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
This moves a simple optimization. Here it's plain to see how :c
removes the need to duplicate code to handle commutativity.
Note that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65844
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65867
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65874
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Bootstrap also works for me on the GCC 5 branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
-Original Message-
From: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer [mailto:rep.dot@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 3:57 PM
To: Ajit Kumar Agarwal; l...@redhat.com; GCC Patches
Cc: Vinod Kathail; Shail Aditya Gupta; Vidhumouli Hunsigida; Nagaraju Mekala
Subject: Re: [Patch,tree-optimization]:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66178
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
On Tue, 2015-06-30 at 08:43 +0200, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:44:31AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
I've gone over the changes to the gcc/jit and gcc/testsuite/jit.dg
directories in trunk since gcc 5 and backported the following 4 changes
from trunk to the
Hi!
We are working in Debian —and I know other free software projects
care— in providing our users with a way to reproduce bit-for-bit
identical binary packages from the source and build environment.
See https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/About for some
rationale and further explanations.
This moves the rest of the patterns in match-bitwise.pd from the
match-and-simplify branch (those that make sense - I'll merge the
rest to the tail of match.pd on the branch).
Bootstrap regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2015-06-30 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
--- Comment #12 from Antonio Poggiali antonio.poggiali at datalogic dot com
---
Created attachment 35879
-- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35879action=edit
Temporary patch for gcc 4.9.3
A temporary patch masking the problem on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(gdb) p debug_tree (decl)
var_decl 0x768d7900 a
type integer_type 0x768d0690 int public SI
size integer_cst 0x768ccdf8 constant 32
unit size
On 06/30/2015 03:28 PM, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Martin Liška wrote:
Following patch implements emission of function declarations and removes
hsa_call_block_insn. The insn is replaced with a new hsa_arg_block_insn,
which will make insn iteration flat and much easier
On 06/30/2015 02:54 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 29/06/15 18:57 +0200, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Actually, an unexpected libstdc++-v3/configure change is introduced by some
inconsistency in
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revisionrevision=223196
where acinclude.m4 contains
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf trippels at gcc dot gnu.org ---
trippels@gcc75 ~ % cat tramp3d-v4.ii
class A {
public:
A();
};
int a = 0;
void foo() {
a = 0;
A b;
for (; a;)
;
}
trippels@gcc75 ~ % g++ -r -nostdlib -O2 -flto
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:47:49PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 01:39:29PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
Does my suggestion to build the all_ones constant in TREE_TYPE (@0) and
Hello.
Following patch implements emission of function declarations and removes
hsa_call_block_insn.
The insn is replaced with a new hsa_arg_block_insn, which will make insn
iteration flat and
much easier for register allocator.
Thanks,
Martin
From abb5eb3cf4f8569d2e003aabc5f078fcd17348a6 Mon
Hello.
Attached patch is very simple and does $subject.
Thanks,
Martin
From ad7053eb82a354dce6a5460a3b3c5f1dba939094 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: mliska mli...@suse.cz
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 13:58:51 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Remove assumption that each translation unit must have a
kernel.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66705
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
On 13/06/15 21:05 +0300, Ville Voutilainen wrote:
Another round! The new patch
- makes sure not to change non-deduced parameters to deduced ones, and adds
tests for that.
- removes the name of the bool non-type template parameter for the 'concepts'.
- introduces shortcuts for making the use of
Hi,
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Martin Liška wrote:
Following patch implements emission of function declarations and removes
hsa_call_block_insn. The insn is replaced with a new hsa_arg_block_insn,
which will make insn iteration flat and much easier for register
allocator.
Given that BRIG
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 06:10:00PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 06:03:34PM +0100, James Greenhalgh wrote:
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pr66119.C
I think generally testcases shouldn't be added into g++.dg/ directly,
but subdirectories. So g++.dg/opt/ ?
An unimportant change to meet our usual convention.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
commit a4461920b9169f8d07c8827fa77f6500573ed5a2
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Jun 30 14:27:43 2015 +0100
* include/bits/stl_pair.h: Replace class keyword with
Christophe Lyon writes:
Hi Jiong,
It seems to me that you committed patches 1/N, 2/N and 3/N as only 1
commit (rev 225121).
Am I right?
Yes, 1/2/3 are quite tiny, and seperated for easy review. While I
committed them as one patch.
On 26 June 2015 at 16:39, Marcus Shawcroft
For all LEON3 (with CASA support) the CASA instruction works in
supervisor-mode regardless of ASI used. In user-mode CASA only works
with the user-mode ASI. So CASA with user-mode ASI works for both
user-mode and supervisor-mode. By having user-mode ASI as default, one
would not need to
The following moves some bitwise patterns from the match-and-simplify
branch, extending them with proper conditional converts and removing
the corresponding patterns from fold-const.c
Bootstrap regtest in progress on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Richard.
2015-06-30 Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60364
Paolo Carlini paolo.carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66652
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 30 09:57:20 2015
New Revision: 225166
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225166root=gccview=rev
Log:
Backport transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt-related patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66642
--- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 30 09:57:40 2015
New Revision: 225167
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225167root=gccview=rev
Log:
Add empty loop exit block in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt
On 25/06/15 09:43, Tom de Vries wrote:
Hi,
I ran into a failure with parloops for reduction loop testcase
libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c/parloops-exit-first-loop-alt-3.c. When we
exercise the low iteration count loop, the test-case fails.
To understand the problem, let's first look at what
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65742
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65797
Richard Biener rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Hi,
while testing the (now committed) fix for PR66642 (Add empty loop exit
block in transform_to_exit_first_loop_alt) on the gomp-4_0-branch I ran
into an ICE for the kernels-reduction.c testcase.
For oacc kernels, we don't generate a low iteration count loop, so the
exit block of the loop
On 02/06/15 18:01, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 01/06/15 13:55, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 15:57, Szabolcs Nagy szabolcs.n...@arm.com wrote:
Rewrote the generator script in awk, to avoid dealing with
sed portability issues.
gcc/Changelog:
2015-05-18 Szabolcs Nagy
On June 30, 2015 12:38:13 PM GMT+02:00, Ajit Kumar Agarwal
ajit.kumar.agar...@xilinx.com wrote:
6. Added 2 tests.
a) compilation check tests.
b) execution tests.
The 2 tests seem to be identical, so why do you have both?
Also, please remove cleanup-tree-dump, this is now done
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 03:13:14PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:47:49PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 01:39:29PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
Does
Hi Paul,
I don’t feel confident enough in many parts of the code (including the module
part) to formally review it, but from what I’ve read it seemed rather logical
and well-commented. If it regtests fine, I think your plan (especially at the
current GCC stage) of committing this week is
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 03:13:14PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 02:47:49PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 30 Jun 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015
1 - 100 of 258 matches
Mail list logo
