When cross-building for vxworks, test for declarations of long double
functions in math.h. We don't normally test for these functions when
cross compiling, because link tests don't work, or ever really, but
not defining them as available causes replacements to be defined in
ways that may cause
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93070
John Simon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93071
--- Comment #1 from John Simon ---
*** Bug 93070 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93071
Bug ID: 93071
Summary: std::__lg (and all functions that use it) generates
suboptimal code
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93070
Bug ID: 93070
Summary: std::__lg (and all functions that use it) generates
suboptimal code
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93069
Bug ID: 93069
Summary: Assembler messages: Error: unsupported masking for
`vextracti32x8'
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93062
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93045
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93062
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83784
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83784
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93063
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Created attachment 47549
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47549=edit
Untested patch
Not ready, at the very least it misses a comment and a test, but it shows where
the test needs relaxing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #10 from fdlbxtqi ---
(In reply to fdlbxtqi from comment #9)
> (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #8)
> > (In reply to fdlbxtqi from comment #6)
> > > void copy_char_vector_with_iter(std::vector::iterator
> > > out,std::vector
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #9 from fdlbxtqi ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #8)
> (In reply to fdlbxtqi from comment #6)
> > void copy_char_vector_with_iter(std::vector::iterator
> > out,std::vector const& bits)
> > {
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81396
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4)
> Either we can do something in the bswap pass with it as done in this
> untested patch, or we could consider match.pd optimization for:
> _3 = BIT_FIELD_REF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93068
Bug ID: 93068
Summary: Professional Dissertation Writing Services
Product: gcc
Version: new-ra
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
This morning Julian Rivaud and I fully qualified the new Subversion
dump stream reader against reposurgeon's test suite. This is the same
code Joseph Myers has been using recent versions of to make test
conversions of the GCC history that appear correct.
We believe reposurgeon is now
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93067
--- Comment #1 from Lewis Hyatt ---
Created attachment 47548
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47548=edit
testcases
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93067
Bug ID: 93067
Summary: diagnostics are not aware of -finput-charset
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55791
--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager ---
For reference, clang catches this with its static analyzer:
$ clang --analyze 55791.c
55791.c:10:15: warning: Result of 'malloc' is converted to a pointer of type
'char', which is incompatible with sizeof
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 05:16:54PM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Dec 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > > That's because that commit also edits ChangeLog entries from other
> > > authors. When a commit adds / edits ChangeLog entries for more than one
> > > author (the difference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93052
--- Comment #5 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
1. It should be noted that the idea of problems arising from `p == q ? p : q`
is from Chung-Kil Hur via bug 65752, comment 15.
2. clang bug -- https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44374.
mp; ./a.out
result: 1
--
gcc x86-64 version: gcc (GCC) 10.0.0 20191224 (experimental)
--
On Tue, 24 Dec 2019, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > That's because that commit also edits ChangeLog entries from other
> > authors. When a commit adds / edits ChangeLog entries for more than one
> > author (the difference between purely editing an existing entry and adding
> > a new one,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93055
--- Comment #4 from Alexander Monakov ---
The attachment is edited to test insertion_sort, and doesn't call
accumulate_vector at all - looks like you attached a wrong file?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93056
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93055
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 47546
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47546=edit
preprocessed benchmark
I am attaching preprocessed source. I used -O3 -march=native
-fno-prefetch-loops-arrays (since
Hi!
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 06:55:53PM -0500, Michael Meissner wrote:
> * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_reg_to_addr_mask): New helper
> function to identify the address mask of a hard register.
Do this as a separate patch please. That refactoring is pre-approved.
Please explain in
Testing shows the setting of 32:16 for jump alignment has a significant codesize
cost, however it doesn't make a difference in performance. So set jump-align
to 4 to get 1.6% codesize improvement.
OK for commit?
ChangeLog
2019-12-24 Wilco Dijkstra
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c
Enable the most basic form of compare-branch fusion since various CPUs
support it. This has no measurable effect on cores which don't support
branch fusion, but increases fusion opportunities on cores which do.
Bootstrapped on AArch64, OK for commit?
ChangeLog:
2019-12-24 Wilco Dijkstra
On Tue, Dec 24, 2019 at 11:50:30AM +, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, Roman Zhuykov wrote:
> > I've never used zhr...@gcc.gnu.org email in ChangeLog files. So, it seems
> > odd
> > that it is used in r270511 (my first commit as maintainer), but not in next
>
> That's because that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93055
--- Comment #2 from Alexander Monakov ---
Can you attach preprocessed source and double-check command-line flags? I can't
reproduce the problem with lea, and the code does not have explicit prefetch
instructions that I get with -O3 -march=bdver1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93066
Bug ID: 93066
Summary: libgomp/target.c:525:46: error: expected expression
before ')' token
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
On the front-end side, adding "if" and "if_present" to the "acc
host_data" directive is simple as other directives already support those
clauses.
The 'if_present' status has to be passed along the use_device_ptr flag;
for this a new flag has been introduced, using the gap in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93041
--- Comment #4 from WHR ---
OK, I'm now fully understood what's happens.
If the loop breaks, 'p' must be 0, so the later '**p' will dereference a null
pointer.
Looks like this is actually a feature...
What is up,my honeyboy. I kno you in F-book last few days and I want to see you.
My Name Mary
I do some page with my cool pics.
I`ll Wait your arms.
My nick : Gibbs112.
Com`om Find me there!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93065
Bug ID: 93065
Summary: libgomp: destructor missing to delete
goacc_cleanup_key
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93055
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93061
Mutex changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
On Mon, 23 Dec 2019, Roman Zhuykov wrote:
> I've never used zhr...@gcc.gnu.org email in ChangeLog files. So, it seems odd
> that it is used in r270511 (my first commit as maintainer), but not in next
That's because that commit also edits ChangeLog entries from other
authors. When a commit adds
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93053
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Roman Zhuykov from comment #4)
> PS. Cfarm gcc117 and 118 are not available at the moment, and 113-116 have
> same hardware and old binutils 2.24.
Just compile your own new binutils first.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93053
--- Comment #4 from Roman Zhuykov ---
Maybe this should be catched earlier in configure scripts?
Are there any simple workaround without patching the gcc source? I'm not
familiar with different armvN -march option values. Probably it can help
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68360
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4)
>
> it returns QImode. If it returned SImode as on SPARC, the code would be:
SLOW_BYTE_ACCESS set to 0 is the cause there ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93064
--- Comment #1 from Jan Engelhardt ---
Possibly a duplicate of #92496 (the automatic "Possible duplicates" in the New
Bug form was slow to load), but my preconditions are different: I don't have a
public data member, nor is a template used like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93064
Bug ID: 93064
Summary: ICE on C++20 operator<=> use
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
> On Dec 22, 2019, at 4:56 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
>> And two more.
>>
>> git+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/home/gccadmin/gcc-reposurgeon-4a.git
>> git+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/home/gccadmin/gcc-reposurgeon-4b.git
>
> Two more.
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to fdlbxtqi from comment #6)
> void copy_char_vector_with_iter(std::vector::iterator
> out,std::vector const& bits)
> {
> std::copy_n(bits.begin(),bits.size(),out);
> }
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93063
Bug ID: 93063
Summary: Loop distribution and NOP conversions
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to fdlbxtqi from comment #6)
> > > clearly incorrect
> >
> > Please distinguish between what is wrong (generated code crashes, or returns
> > 3 instead of 2), and what is suboptimal.
>
> Suppose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #6 from fdlbxtqi ---
> What operation are you doing on vector? None of your testcases seem to use
> it.
void copy_char_vector_with_iter(std::vector::iterator
out,std::vector const& bits)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93059
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
We could indeed relax a bit the "same type" condition. We could also make sure
that __restrict appears somewhere in the call chain when using copy or
uninitialized_*, which lets the compiler merge the 2
51 matches
Mail list logo
