PING^2
Hongyu Wang 于2020年7月17日周五 下午1:40写道：
>
> Update for SAPPHIRERAPIDS and PING
>
> Hongyu Wang 于2020年7月7日周二 上午11:24写道：
>
> >
> > Hi Kirill, could you help review this patch?
> >
> > Hongyu Wang 于2020年7月6日周一 上午9:58写道：
> > >
> > > Hi:
> > >
> > > This patch is about to support Intel Advanced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96024
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
gcc/ChangeLog:
* genemit.c (main): Print 'split line'.
* Makefile.in (insn-emit.c): Define split count and file
---
gcc/Makefile.in | 10 ++
gcc/genemit.c | 87 -
2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git
在 2020年7月21日 +0800 PM2:55，Bin.Cheng ，写道：
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:14 AM Jojo wrote:
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > * genemit.c (main): Print 'split line'.
> > * Makefile.in (insn-emit.c): Define split count and file
> >
>
> Thanks for working one this, following comments are based on the
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96305
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96305
Bug ID: 96305
Summary: Unnecessary signed x unsigned multiplication with
squares or signed variables
Product: gcc
Version: 7.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
Sorry I am a newbie to cross compilation, but overall, as far as I can see,
the following two options both won't work:
1. If I compile instrument_cov.so with gcc as a x86-64bit ELF executable,
then it throws the above error (mentioned in my first email) when being
loaded by
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 2:28 PM Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>
> This patch to libgo updates it to the Go 1.14.6 release. Bootstrapped
> and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Committed to mainline.
I have now committed this to the GCC 10 branch as well.
Ian
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 9:53 PM Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 4:39 PM Jan Hubicka wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> > sorry for taking so long to get to this.
> > > diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.c
> > > b/gcc/config/i386/i386-features.c
> > > index 535fc7e981d..8f81d101382
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95886
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0e5ec934e7a7473275326e2aee58eaf252cdff1
commit r11-2301-gb0e5ec934e7a7473275326e2aee58eaf252cdff1
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Thu Jul 23
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 4:50 PM Martin Sebor wrote:
>
> On 7/23/20 2:18 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:14 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 7/22/20 2:23 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> >>> Hi Martin,
> >>>
> I have committed this change in r11-2231 after
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95907
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |bergner at gcc dot
gnu.org
We get an ICE when using -mpower10 and a -mcpu= value that is older
than power10. The -mpower10 option requires -mcpu=power10 or later.
The following patch enforces that.
This passed bootstrap and regtesting with no errors. Ok for trunk?
GCC 10 does not ICE on this test case, so I am not
On 7/23/20 2:18 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:14 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
On 7/22/20 2:23 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Martin,
I have committed this change in r11-2231 after Jeff approved it
off list last Thursday.
the new gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr95886.c test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96190
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Sergei Trofimovich
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca47325f300462b6f4ea84de2103eef81a4a7684
commit r10-8527-gca47325f300462b6f4ea84de2103eef81a4a7684
Author: Sergei
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 05:47:28PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 12:28 -0400, Lewis Hyatt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Hello-
> >
> > The attached patch is complete including docs, but I tagged as RFC
> > because I am not sure if anyone will like it, or if the general
> >
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 09:45:08PM +0200, Andrea Corallo wrote:
> > Should that actually be a sliding window, or should there actually just
> > not be more than N branches per aligned block of machine code? Like,
> > per fetch group.
> >
> > Can you not use ASM_OUTPUT_ALIGN_WITH_NOP (or
Snapshot gcc-8-20200723 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/8-20200723/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 8 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90415
Bernd Baumanns changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||familiebaumanns at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94738
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 12:28 -0400, Lewis Hyatt via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Hello-
>
> The attached patch is complete including docs, but I tagged as RFC
> because I am not sure if anyone will like it, or if the general
> reaction may
> be closer to recoiling in horror :). Would appreciate your
This patch by Clément Chigot adds AIX FAT library support to libgo.
This follows the same general idea as support in other GCC libraries
like libgcc and libsdc++. Committed to mainline.
Ian
83cc5e2b2f887d4bb2305658da382a65fdcaab29
diff --git a/gcc/go/gofrontend/MERGE b/gcc/go/gofrontend/MERGE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93567
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Created attachment 48922
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=48922=edit
Patch adjusted for GCC8 and 9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96304
--- Comment #2 from D. Richard Hipp ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Does -fno-strict-aliasing helps?
The problem goes away if I compile with -fno-strict-aliasing. I should have
thought to try that.
But, are we violating
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93592
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The patch applies and regtest cleanly down to GCC8.
IMO this is nasty wrong code and it should be fixed on all the active branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96304
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does -fno-strict-aliasing helps?
-around here:
https://www.sqlite.org/src/info/40c44d38104dfcb6
The forum post in the first link describes how to recreate the problem. I will
repeat that text here for completeness:
1. Download https://sqlite.org/tmp/gcc-problem-20200723/sftest.c (7.8MB) and
https://sqlite.org/tmp/gcc-problem
The testglue object file gets interpreted as another input file,
changing the dump and aux output names in GCC unless it is protected
by -Wl, like board file-named extra inputs.
Refactor the code that modifies the board settings so that it can be
used to modify regular variables as well, and do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92006
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
My draft of the standard says: the argument A
shall be a data object of any type. If it is polymorphic it shall not be an
undefined pointer. If it is unlimited polymorphic or has any deferred type
On 7/23/20 10:28 AM, Lewis Hyatt via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hello-
The attached patch is complete including docs, but I tagged as RFC
because I am not sure if anyone will like it, or if the general reaction may
be closer to recoiling in horror :). Would appreciate your thoughts,
please...
I don't
On Jul 23, 2020, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2020, Zhanghaijian (A) wrote:
>> # This option restores naming of aux and dump output files
>> # after input files when multiple input files are named,
>> # instead of getting them combined with the output name.
> Does it actually do what
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 02:29:00PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 15:19 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 01:42:59PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 14:25 -0500, Pat Haugen via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > > Disable -fcaller-saves by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750
--- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Joseph C. Sible from comment #14)
> I notice this change affects -Os too, even though "lock orq $0,(%rsp)" is 6
> bytes and "mfence" is only 3 bytes.
Yes, we can emit mfence for -Os. I'm testing
On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 15:19 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 01:42:59PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 14:25 -0500, Pat Haugen via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > > Disable -fcaller-saves by default.
> > >
> > > This patch turns off -fcaller-saves by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96213
--- Comment #2 from Arthur O'Dwyer ---
Here's a similar situation I just ran into again, somehow!
// https://godbolt.org/z/3TKG1z
struct S {};
template void f() {}
template void g() {}
int main() {
f(); // correctly errors out
g(); //
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 1:14 PM Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> On 7/22/20 2:23 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> >> I have committed this change in r11-2231 after Jeff approved it
> >> off list last Thursday.
> >
> > the new gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr95886.c test FAILs on 32-bit
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 01:42:59PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 14:25 -0500, Pat Haugen via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Disable -fcaller-saves by default.
> >
> > This patch turns off -fcaller-saves by default so that IRA doesn't try
> > to use volatile regs for pseudos that are
On 7/22/20 2:23 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Hi Martin,
I have committed this change in r11-2231 after Jeff approved it
off list last Thursday.
the new gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr95886.c test FAILs on 32-bit x86
(i386-pc-solaris2.11):
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/memcpy-pr95886.c scan-rtl-dump-times
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95886
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8598657c607500512075f6c4ee3b10460c94903d
commit r11-2298-g8598657c607500512075f6c4ee3b10460c94903d
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Thu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94331
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a3980ada1bd99cf8df22284862693088e5d1ca7c
commit r10-8525-ga3980ada1bd99cf8df22284862693088e5d1ca7c
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95980
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:76a8ff3948ad5a36ccae7305a2e9a7c2499418e5
commit r10-8526-g76a8ff3948ad5a36ccae7305a2e9a7c2499418e5
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-8 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:41c072bded24642d6b4a38e3f5e2890c1aa8c5a1
commit r8-10372-g41c072bded24642d6b4a38e3f5e2890c1aa8c5a1
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2fe9b1bf79037a90bc5146efe77417b888a86a0
commit r9-8762-gb2fe9b1bf79037a90bc5146efe77417b888a86a0
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93091
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
On Thu, 2020-07-23 at 14:25 -0500, Pat Haugen via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Disable -fcaller-saves by default.
>
> This patch turns off -fcaller-saves by default so that IRA doesn't try
> to use volatile regs for pseudos that are live across a call, which
> would then require LRA to save/restore the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96236
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 79627, which changed state.
Bug 79627 Summary: Ice with type of VLA in lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16994
Bug 16994 depends on bug 79627, which changed state.
Bug 79627 Summary: Ice with type of VLA in lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79627
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89336
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92006
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 83583, which changed state.
Bug 83583 Summary: ICE in synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at
cp/parser.c:38794
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83583
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83583
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86002
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Disable -fcaller-saves by default.
This patch turns off -fcaller-saves by default so that IRA doesn't try
to use volatile regs for pseudos that are live across a call, which
would then require LRA to save/restore the reg around the call.
Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64le with no new regressions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96303
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at
Another test case added to the bug since I posted the patch shows
that the no-warning bit set by the C++ front end is easily lost
during early folding, triggering the -Wnonull again despite
the suppression. The attached revision tweaks the folder in just
this one case to let the suppression take
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96086
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96086
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6dd74062d215682e1f9b3ca618a9d38585dd4831
commit r10-8524-g6dd74062d215682e1f9b3ca618a9d38585dd4831
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bab0c51af90f475dab8f1b306737cd04b06d4b04
commit r10-8523-gbab0c51af90f475dab8f1b306737cd04b06d4b04
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96303
Bug ID: 96303
Summary: Ambiguous overload for operator!= for
std::__debug::bitset compiled with -std=c++20 and
-pedantic.
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.1
Many thanks to Segher Boessenkool for the speedy review. The following
patch
has been committed after testing on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. In the recent
patch
to simplify-rtx.c I had incorrectly extrapolated from AND distributing over
AND,
and IOR distributing over IOR, that XOR distributes over
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91525
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96224
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> Could you be more explicit about what you would like?
How about:
mod::init ()
or
mod.init ()
to indicate the relevant namespace.
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 04:56:14PM +0100, Jozef Lawrynowicz wrote:
> +static int
> +msp430_insn_cost (rtx_insn *insn, bool speed ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
> +{
> + int cost;
> +
> + if (recog_memoized (insn) < 0)
> +return 0;
> +
> + cost = get_attr_length (insn);
> + if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96018
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96018
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7be5add5534f4310b294f1b7ad8855a424edb8c1
commit r9-8761-g7be5add5534f4310b294f1b7ad8855a424edb8c1
Author: Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90623
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89871
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90301
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87032
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96220
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the German team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/de.po
(This file, 'gcc-10.2.0.de.po', has
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87765
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96302
Bug ID: 96302
Summary: Linux build of gnat/ada fails for lack of gnatdll
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d4b3ea941b1a15cadb79e7ff8a36891131f8804b
commit r11-2296-gd4b3ea941b1a15cadb79e7ff8a36891131f8804b
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Thu
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 7/23/20 4:44 PM, Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > Here's a rebased patch. Can another Vim user verify that this does the
> > right thing?
>
> Yes, it works correctly for me! I tested that before and after your change
> for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79367
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-checking, |rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96220
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Thomas Kथà¤nig
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:159c7ca3c3ce34e401b9e57734ecca8b37d8a0ec
commit r9-8760-g159c7ca3c3ce34e401b9e57734ecca8b37d8a0ec
Author: Thomas Koenig
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot. (If you have
any questions, send them to .)
A new POT file for textual domain 'gcc' has been made available
to the language teams for translation. It is archived as:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56673
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95750
Joseph C. Sible changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||josephcsible at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35098
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96236
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5497677b497b95a261089d19f5295cc80f99a2b6
commit r10-8522-g5497677b497b95a261089d19f5295cc80f99a2b6
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96298
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|segher at gcc dot gnu.org |sayle at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 68826, which changed state.
Bug 68826 Summary: [concepts] ICE in fold expression with requires
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68826
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68828
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 68826 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68826
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94065
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by David Edelsohn :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eb0a835d643394d89b13d4f0ac12f2af3e78228d
commit r9-8759-geb0a835d643394d89b13d4f0ac12f2af3e78228d
Author: David Edelsohn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 68827, which changed state.
Bug 68827 Summary: [concepts] ICE in fold where requires parameter shadows
function argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68827
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68828
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
*** Bug 68827 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68827
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68828
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-07-23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93690
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96301
--- Comment #1 from Iain Buclaw ---
The static array path has a different ICE, but the underlying cause is the
same.
test.d:20:18: internal compiler error: in convert_memory_address_addr_space_1,
at explow.c:302
20 | auto result
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96301
Bug ID: 96301
Summary: d: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault during
RTL pass: expand on armhf/armel/s390x
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94048
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Hello-
The attached patch is complete including docs, but I tagged as RFC
because I am not sure if anyone will like it, or if the general reaction may
be closer to recoiling in horror :). Would appreciate your thoughts,
please...
Currently, if a UTF-8 locale is detected, GCC changes the quote
1 - 100 of 376 matches
Mail list logo
