That looks like a spam or phishing email, pretending to be from Gerald.
On Tue, 17 May 2022, 03:44 Ceasar Sun, wrote:
> Hi Gerald,
>
> I got a disordered response from your email (such as the attachment).
> Would you please send again ?
>
> BRs,
>
> Ceasar
>
>
> Gerald Pfeifer 於 2022/5/1
On 5/16/22 16:39, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Mai 16 2022, Andreas Krebbel via Gcc wrote:
>
>> The only way I see right now is adding a new reg note to invalidate
>> the save information in the reg_save array in dwarf2cfi.
>>
>> Would this be acceptable? Is there perhaps an easier way to achieve th
Hi Gerald,
I got a disordered response from your email (such as the attachment).
Would you please send again ?
BRs,
Ceasar
Gerald Pfeifer 於 2022/5/17 00:31 寫道:
Hello There,
Kindly go over the following belo-w f-iles at your very first
opportunity and also make sure you give us with yo
.
* Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/13.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 13.0.0 20220516 (experimental) (GCC
On Mai 16 2022, Andreas Krebbel via Gcc wrote:
> The only way I see right now is adding a new reg note to invalidate
> the save information in the reg_save array in dwarf2cfi.
>
> Would this be acceptable? Is there perhaps an easier way to achieve that?
Doesn't it work to use .cfi_remember_state/
* Andreas Krebbel via Gcc:
> For that purpose I save the argument registers to the stack as we
> would do for a variable argument lists. But this time I also provide
> the CFI to allow the unwinder to locate the save slots. Since I never
> actually intend to restore the content there is no matchi
On 16/05/2022 09.18, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 14:00 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> []
>> Changes in v3:
>> Revert suggested change in v2, for kernel test robot found
>>
>> warning: Function parameter or member 'flush_workqueue' not described in
>> 'void'
>> warning: expe
On Mon, 2022-05-16 at 14:00 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
[]
> Changes in v3:
> Revert suggested change in v2, for kernel test robot found
>
> warning: Function parameter or member 'flush_workqueue' not described in
> 'void'
> warning: expecting prototype for flush_workqueue(). Prototype
