Hello Segher:
On 24/02/23 8:41 pm, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> For future patches: please don't send patches as replies to existing
> threads. Just start a new thread for a new patch (series). You can
> mark it as [PATCH v2] in the subject, if you want.
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55218
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55658
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rogero at howzatt dot co.uk
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66364
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55658
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108920
--- Comment #3 from Agner Fog ---
It seems to work with gcc 9.4.0.
Thank you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108922
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108922
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>The committer also claims "fixes ieee_2.f90 testsuite failure" but I have no
>idea where to find this testsuite.
./testsuite/gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_2.f90
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023 05:09:30 PST (-0800), gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
It did help people to identify what extension used in the binary, so I
would prefer keep that enable by default.
IMO it actually hurts more than helps, as it's not really encoding what
extensions are in the binary (or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108920
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108893
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
access attribute says if it is access, then it will be that. It does not say it
MUST be accessed. That is what nonnull is for.
>I didn't want to use __attribute__((nonnull)) because the optimizer may use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108893
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID
--- Comment #6 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108893
--- Comment #5 from Jonny Grant ---
Here is an example, no warnings during compilation.
https://godbolt.org/z/h8E7r3Wf8
#include
// Try get a build warning for nullptr dereference
__attribute__ ((access (read_only, 1, 2))) void f(char * s,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108930
--- Comment #2 from michael_greenburg at byu dot edu ---
Created attachment 54535
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54535=edit
The *.ii file from `-save-temps`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108930
--- Comment #1 from michael_greenburg at byu dot edu ---
Created attachment 54534
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54534=edit
The *.out file from `-freport-bug`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108930
Bug ID: 108930
Summary: Internal compiler error with -fopenmp
(tsubst_omp_for_iterator)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Snapshot gcc-11-20230224 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/11-20230224/
and on various mirrors, see http://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 11 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108871
--- Comment #7 from Jonny Grant ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> > > *** Bug 108893 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Hi Rimvydas,
Am 24.02.23 um 06:16 schrieb Rimvydas Jasinskas via Gcc-patches:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:53 PM Harald Anlauf wrote:
the patch is mostly fine, but there is a minor style issue:
+ if (sym->attr.ext_attr & (1 << EXT_ATTR_WEAK))
+ gfc_error ("Symbol %qs at %L has the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108923
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Hi Tobias,
Am 24.02.23 um 12:31 schrieb Tobias Burnus:
(B) The attached patch:
With 'intent(out)' there is no reason to do the conversions. While for
nullified
pointers the bounds-conversion loop is skipped, it may still be executed
for undefined
pointers. (Which is usually harmless.) In
Hello,
I have just pushed a for PR108923 (a memory leak).
It fixes the small reproducer that I pasted in bugzilla, and I have run
it through the fortran regression testsuite.
More details in the patch.From 545a7d5da5fcc338e29c5241b574ac99d03f4454 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mikael Morin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108923
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24c9edfa73632276d7698c103f35833f29804d98
commit r13-6337-g24c9edfa73632276d7698c103f35833f29804d98
Author: Mikael Morin
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68800
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108924
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last
Dear all,
as reported by Richard - although without a testcase - we leak
gmp memory in do_subscript(). The attached patch was derived
by inspection of the code pointed at by valgrind and regtested
on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.
Committed as obvious as
commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108929
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108924
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45f406c4f62e516b58dcda20b5a7aa43ff0aa0f3
commit r13-6336-g45f406c4f62e516b58dcda20b5a7aa43ff0aa0f3
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108929
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108929
Bug ID: 108929
Summary: bfin-openbsd: Issues calling `as` when trying to build
Module-2 components
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106977
--- Comment #30 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to ibuclaw from comment #29)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #27)
> > great!
> >
> > we make more progress now - at least past libphobos configure:
> >
> > we now fail building
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108923
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin ---
Here is a small reproducer by the way:
program p
implicit none
call s(0)
contains
subroutine s(i)
integer :: i
end subroutine s
end program p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108923
--- Comment #2 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #1)
> Should be easy to fix anyway.
Not that easy after all.
The following (obvious) fix regresses heavily.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.cc b/gcc/fortran/expr.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86802
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|wilson at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108928
Bug ID: 108928
Summary: epiphany-elf: unrecognizable insn (internal compiler
error: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791) triggered
during Modula-2 build
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108846
--- Comment #12 from Giuseppe D'Angelo ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> (In reply to Giuseppe D'Angelo from comment #5)
> > https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/bits/
> >
I'll install this as obvious provided that the prerequisite
multiline.exp patch is approved.
-- >8 --
For 32-bit newlib targets (such as cris-elf and pru-elf),
that int32_t is "long int". See other regexps in the
testsuite matching "aka (long )?int" (with single-quotes
where needed) where the
Ok to commit?
-- >8 --
Those multi-line-patterns are literal. Sometimes a regexp
needs to be matched. This is a start: just three elements
are supported: "(" ")" and the compound ")?" (and on second
thought, it can be argued that "(...)" alone is not useful).
Note that Tcl "string map" is
On Fri, 2023-02-24 at 18:54 +0100, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Ok to commit?
Looks good to me [1]
Thanks
Dave
[1] though FWIW although I wrote this code, my DejaGnu skills are weak
and I'm not a testsuite maintainer :-/
>
> -- >8 --
> I see overlong lines in the output when a test fails, for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030
Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #13 from
On Friday, 24 February 2023 18:14:53 CET Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Looks like there are a few remaining spaces that could be removed
> where you've joined lines, e.g.
Fixed and pushed.
> OK for trunk anyway (and the branches if you want).
I'll likely backport after I backported all other patches
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108030
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e37b04328ae68f91efe1fb2c5de9122be34bc74a
commit r13-6334-ge37b04328ae68f91efe1fb2c5de9122be34bc74a
Author: Matthias Kretz
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108856
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Matthias Kretz :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ce55180d494b616e2e3e68ffedfe9007e42ca06
commit r13-6333-g6ce55180d494b616e2e3e68ffedfe9007e42ca06
Author: Matthias Kretz
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106977
--- Comment #29 from ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #27)
> great!
>
> we make more progress now - at least past libphobos configure:
>
> we now fail building druntime/core/atomic.d and I am not quite sure
On Linux/x86_64,
3da77f217c8b2089ecba3eb201e727c3fcdcd19d is the first bad commit
commit 3da77f217c8b2089ecba3eb201e727c3fcdcd19d
Author: Andrew Stubbs
Date: Thu Jul 28 16:07:22 2022 +0100
vect: inbranch SIMD clones
caused
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-simd-clone-16.c scan-tree-dump-times vect
on a structure with a C99 flexible array member being nested in
another structure.
"GCC extension accepts a structure containing an ISO C99 "flexible array
member", or a union containing such a structure (possibly recursively)
to be a member of a structure.
There are two situations:
* The
GCC extension accepts the case when a struct with a C99 flexible array member
is embedded into another struct or union (possibly recursively).
__builtin_object_size should treat such struct as flexible size.
gcc/c/ChangeLog:
PR tree-optimization/101832
* c-decl.cc
Hi, Joseph and Richard,
Could you please review this patch and let me know whether it???s ready
for committing into GCC13?
The fix to Bug PR101832 is an important patch for kernel security
purpose. it's better to be put into GCC13.
=
These are the 4th version of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106977
--- Comment #28 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #27)
> great!
>
> we make more progress now - at least past libphobos configure:
>
> we now fail building druntime/core/atomic.d and I am not quite sure how to
>
Ok to commit?
-- >8 --
I see overlong lines in the output when a test fails, for
example for a bug exposed for cris-elf and pru-elf in
gcc.dg/analyzer/allocation-size-multiline-3.c:
Running /x/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/analyzer/analyzer.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/allocation-size-multiline-3.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106977
--- Comment #27 from Iain Sandoe ---
great!
we make more progress now - at least past libphobos configure:
we now fail building druntime/core/atomic.d and I am not quite sure how to
interpret the backtrace (from b internal_error).
(lldb) bt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108921
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Keywords|
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 08:54, Matthias Kretz via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
>
>
> Whitespace changes only.
Looks like there are a few remaining spaces that could be removed
where you've joined lines, e.g.
+{ return static_cast<_Up*>( __builtin_assume_aligned(__ptr,
_S_alignment<_Tp, _Up>)); }
and
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 08:54, Matthias Kretz via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
>
>
> For simd, the inlining behavior should be similar to builtin types. (No
> operator on buitin types is ever translated into a function call.)
> Therefore, always_inline is the right choice (i.e. inline on -O0 as
> well).
OK
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 at 08:55, Matthias Kretz via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
OK for trunk (and maybe backport later if you want to).
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kretz
>
> libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
>
> PR libstdc++/108856
> * include/experimental/bits/simd_builtin.h
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108927
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
You are using a month old sources, can you try with a much newer trunk sources?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108923
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mikael at gcc dot
gnu.org
Am Freitag, dem 24.02.2023 um 10:01 -0600 schrieb Serge E. Hallyn:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 09:36:45AM +0100, Martin Uecker wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, dem 23.02.2023 um 19:21 -0600 schrieb Serge E. Hallyn:
...
> >
> > Yes, but one comment about terminology:. The C standard
> > differentiates
Ok to commit?
I suggest that when committed I'll also set the bugzilla
entry in SUSPENDED mode, as opposed to RESOLVED. I mean,
the issue isn't really solved; that'd be a patch improving
pointer tracking across ivopts.
-- >8 --
For cris-elf before this patch, ever since it was added,
this test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108924
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108927
Bug ID: 108927
Summary: error: too few arguments to function 'long unsigned
int __riscv_vsetvlmax_e8mf8(void)'
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 02:42:32AM +0100, Alex Colomar wrote:
> Hi Serge, Martin,
>
> On 2/24/23 02:21, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > Does all this imply that the following is well defined behavior (and shall
> > > print what one would expect)?
> > >
> > >free(p);
> > >
> > >(void) //
Hi! I've been interested in compiler development for a while, and would love to
work with any of you as part of GSoC, or even just as a side-project on my own.
I'm an 18 year-old student going into university next year with a passion for
all
things open source and low level. I consider myself
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 09:36:45AM +0100, Martin Uecker wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, dem 23.02.2023 um 19:21 -0600 schrieb Serge E. Hallyn:
> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 01:02:54AM +0100, Alex Colomar wrote:
> > > Hi Martin,
> > >
> > > On 2/23/23 20:57, Martin Uecker wrote:
> > > > Am Donnerstag, dem
Hi,
My name is Ken Matsui. I am highly interested in contributing to the
project idea, "C++: Implement compiler built-in traits for the
standard library traits." To understand how to implement those traits,
could you please give me some example implementations of the compiler
built-in traits, as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108545
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
For the C/C++ testcase of comment 3, bisecting points to
commit r12-5835-g0ab29cf0bb68960c1f87405f14b4fb2109254e2f
"openmp: Improve OpenMP target support for C++ (PR92120)"
Could you move those thead_* and th_* functions into thead.cc
> +static bool
> +thead_mempair_operand_p (rtx mem, machine_mode mode)
> +{
> + if (!MEM_SIZE_KNOWN_P (mem))
> +return false;
> +
> + /* Only DI or SI mempair instructions exist. */
add gcc_assert (mode == SImode || mode ==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108896
Martin Uecker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||muecker at gwdg dot de
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108840
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 54531
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54531=edit
Candidate patch
Candidate patch attached.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107884
--- Comment #8 from Michael N. Moran ---
I tried to build with after patching with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53980 and now get an assembler
failure.
/tmp/cc2C1wMh.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/cc2C1wMh.s:82060: Error: value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107884
Michael N. Moran changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mike at mnmoran dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108834
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.2.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108834
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94c9b1bb79f63d000ebb05efc155c149325e332d
commit r13-6330-g94c9b1bb79f63d000ebb05efc155c149325e332d
Author: Martin Liska
Date:
On 2/24/23 10:07, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 10:00:01AM +0100, Martin Liška wrote:
>> As mentioned in the PR, when we use LTO, we wrongly use ltrans output
>> file name as a module name of a global variable. That leads to a
>> non-reproducible output.
>>
>> After the suggested
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/scalar_move-1.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/scalar_move-2.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/scalar_move-3.c: New test.
* gcc.target/riscv/rvv/base/scalar_move-4.c: New test.
From: Ju-Zhe Zhong
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/constraints.md (Wb1): New constraint.
* config/riscv/predicates.md
(vector_least_significant_set_mask_operand): New predicate.
(vector_broadcast_mask_operand): Ditto.
* config/riscv/riscv-protos.h (enum
Hi!
For future patches: please don't send patches as replies to existing
threads. Just start a new thread for a new patch (series). You can
mark it as [PATCH v2] in the subject, if you want.
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 01:41:49PM +0530, Ajit Agarwal wrote:
> Here is the patch that uses xxlor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108545
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Fortran: Same issue (ICE) also with:
!$omp target enter data map(to: x)
Crucial is the VOLATILE attribute.
* * *
The following C code already gives an ICE with GCC 12, it works with GCC 11.
(Either
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105224
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d1d3ece9bc5a1baa2feb4bf231b709c097b8434
commit r13-6329-g3d1d3ece9bc5a1baa2feb4bf231b709c097b8434
Author: Alexandre Oliva
On Feb 24, 2023, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> Given the logic of this macro, the text should be
> "!TARGET_CXX_METHOD_MAY_BE_INLINE".
I was thinking just "related to that macro", but yeah, negating it makes
sense.
> OK with that change.
Thanks, here's what I'm checking in.
[PR105224] C++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107557
--- Comment #7 from Martin Uecker ---
Created attachment 54529
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54529=edit
new version of patch
Here is another patch that does all the recursion in gimplify_type_sizes.
Unfortunately, there
Tested x86_64-linux. Pushed to trunk.
-- >8 --
I messed up the endianness of the address_v4::bytes_type array, which
should always be in network byte order. We can just use bit_cast to
convert the _M_addr member to/from bytes_type.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
*
Tested x86_64-linux. Pushed to trunk.
-- >8 --
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/experimental/internet (network_v4::netmask()): Avoid
undefined shift.
(network_v4::broadcast()): Optimize and fix for targets with
uint_least32_t wider than 32 bits.
Tested x86_64-linux. Pushed to trunk.
-- >8 --
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/experimental/internet (basic_endpoint): Add missing
constexpr to comparison operators.
* testsuite/experimental/net/internet/endpoint/cons.cc: New test.
---
Tested x86_64-linux. Pushed to trunk.
-- >8 --
The TS says the arguments to these constructors shall meet the Executor
requirements, so it's undefined if they don't. Constraining on a subset
of those requirements won't affect valid cases, but prevents the
majority of invalid cases from trying to
Tested x86_64-linux. Pushed to trunk.
-- >8 --
This is an order of magnitude faster than calling inet_ntop (and not
only because we now avoid allocating a string that is one byte larger
than the SSO buffer).
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/experimental/internet
Tested powerpc64le-linux. Pushed to trunk.
-- >8 --
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* include/ext/aligned_buffer.h (__aligned_buffer): Add
diagnostic pragmas.
---
libstdc++-v3/include/ext/aligned_buffer.h | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63357
--- Comment #10 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #9)
> Please open a new PR mentioning this one.
Done. See 108926.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108926
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #0)
> This bug is related to 53357.
Sorry. 63357.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108926
Bug ID: 108926
Summary: No warning for same expression in chain of | or & ?
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Tested x86_64-linux. Pushed to trunk.
-- >8 --
The options need to be set first, so that -std=gnu++20 is used when
checking the c++20 effective target.
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
* testsuite/std/format/arguments/lwg3810.cc: Move dg-options
before dg-do.
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108545
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
On Fri, 24 Feb 2023, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 02:47:39PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > * vec.h (vec::m_vecdata): Remove.
> > (vec::m_vecpfx): Align as T to avoid
> > changing alignment of vec and simplifying
> > address.
> > (vec::address): Compute as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105329
Gustaw Smolarczyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wielkiegie at gmail dot com
---
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 02:47:39PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> * vec.h (vec::m_vecdata): Remove.
> (vec::m_vecpfx): Align as T to avoid
> changing alignment of vec and simplifying
> address.
> (vec::address): Compute as this + 1.
> (vec::embedded_size): Use
On Fri, Feb 24, 2023 at 02:46:21PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> As preparation to remove m_vecdata in the vl_embed vector this
> changes references to it into calls to address ().
>
> As I was here it also fixes ::contains to avoid repeated bounds
> checking and the same issue in ::lower_bound
> On Feb 23, 2023, at 7:56 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Feb 2023, Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
>> But the following:
>>
>> struct flex1 { int length1; char data1[]; };
>> struct flex2 { int length2; char data2[]; };
>> union union_flex { struct flex1 f1; struct flex2 f2;
The following avoids default-initializing auto_vec storage for
non-POD T since that's not what the allocated storage fallback
will do and it's also not expected for existing cases like
auto_vec, 64> elts;
which exist to optimize the allocation.
It also fixes the array accesses done by vec to
As preparation to remove m_vecdata in the vl_embed vector this
changes references to it into calls to address ().
As I was here it also fixes ::contains to avoid repeated bounds
checking and the same issue in ::lower_bound which also suffers
from unnecessary copying around values.
*
> Hi!
>
> The following testcase ICEs on x86_64-linux with -m32. The problem is
> we create an artificial thunk and because of -fPIC, ia32 and thunk
> destination which doesn't bind locally can't use a mi thunk.
> The ICE is because during expansion to RTL we see SSA_NAME for a PARM_DECL,
> but
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
