https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23872
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 57968
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57968=edit
Patch set that I will be submitting once GCC 15 opens up
git commit g:d11be846d490db88741e9ca1b11980e1abe446d8
gcc-descr r11-11325-gd11be846d490db
power8
Linux 5.4.0-174-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 17 04:14:28 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114732
--- Comment #6 from HaoChen Gui ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #3)
> 1001, 0101, 0011 I mean of course.
>
> In some ways CCmode models this better than CCFPmode, but we do not actually
> model
> the SO bit (bit 3) at all in
pported tests 3429
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes602151
# of unexpected failures340
# of unexpected successes 60
# of expected failures 4653
# of unsupported tests 10805
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-intel64/bld/g
git commit g:b524ae8079160872d86781865036c8287a128d7b
gcc-descr r13-8613-gb524ae80791608
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 17 04:07:36 UTC 2024
Hi,
This patch fixes loss of return statement in maxbcd of bcd-4.c. Without
return statement, it returns an invalid bcd number and make the test
noneffective. The patch also enables test to run on Power9 and Big Endian,
as all bcd instructions are supported from Power9.
Bootstrapped and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114735
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Gejoe from comment #4)
> Thanks Andrew for the info.
>
> So, does this mean that every program which was compiled earlier with one
> step (ie. gcc --coverage srcfile.c) of gcc/g++ will have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114735
--- Comment #5 from Gejoe ---
my previous message is after seeing this change :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114735
--- Comment #4 from Gejoe ---
Thanks Andrew for the info.
So, does this mean that every program which was compiled earlier with one step
(ie. gcc --coverage srcfile.c) of gcc/g++ will have to be split to 2 steps
using -c option first and then
git commit g:b524ae8079160872d86781865036c8287a128d7b
gcc-descr r13-8613-gb524ae80791608
power9 BE
Linux 6.7.9-powerpc64 ppc64
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 17 03:24:38 UTC 2024
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-intel64/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1
20240416 (experimental) [master r14-9996-g48024a99e3c] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
=== gfortran Summary for unix ===
# of expected passes70038
# of expec
git commit g:b524ae8079160872d86781865036c8287a128d7b
gcc-descr r13-8613-gb524ae80791608
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.9.0-0.rc3.30.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 17
git commit g:9c7cf5d71f071655a90a6d364369d111bafdb25a
gcc-descr r14--g9c7cf5d71f0716
power8
Linux 5.4.0-174-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 17 01:57:17 UTC 2024
git commit g:d11be846d490db88741e9ca1b11980e1abe446d8
gcc-descr r11-11325-gd11be846d490db
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 17 02:54:48 UTC 2024
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Apr 16 17:05:29 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9996-g48024a99e3c)
=== acats tests ===
FAIL: cb1010a
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2327
# of unexpected failures1
Native configuration is s390x-ibm-linux-gnu arch14
# From https://ci.linaro.org/job/tcwg_gcc_check--master-arm-build/1985/:
LAST_UPDATED: 2024-04-17T03:03:57+00:00 (master revision
gcc-14--g9c7cf5d71f0) armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
Native configuration is armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf
=== libatomic tests ===
Running
git commit g:9c7cf5d71f071655a90a6d364369d111bafdb25a
gcc-descr r14--g9c7cf5d71f0716
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.9.0-0.rc3.30.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 17
git commit g:073e2c31bbd2ebe24dc8c78e6052e3c5ec90bd66
gcc-descr r12-10334-g073e2c31bbd2eb
power9 BE
Linux 6.7.9-powerpc64 ppc64
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 17 01:53:37 UTC 2024
git commit g:9c7cf5d71f071655a90a6d364369d111bafdb25a
gcc-descr r14--g9c7cf5d71f0716
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 17 01:23:46 UTC 2024
Regressions on master at commit r14-9997 vs commit r14-9993 on Linux/i686
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_124-pr114403.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_124-pr114403.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
execution test
/git/gcc-test-master-ia32/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1
20240416 (experimental) [master-ia32 r14-9997-gf438acf7ce2] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes69698
# of expected failures
ted tests 4115
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-ia32/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1
20240416 (experimental) [master r14-9997-gf438acf7ce2] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
=== gfortran Summary ===
# of expected passes
Regressions on master at commit r14-9997 vs commit r14-9993 on Linux/i686
New failures:
New passes:
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_124-pr114403.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_124-pr114403.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects
execution test
Hi,
Ping this RFC, look forward to comments for the incoming stage1...
Jeff (Jiufu Guo)
Jiufu Guo writes:
> Hi,
>
> As known there are a few PRs (meta-bug PR101926) about
> accessing aggregate param/returns which are passed through registers.
>
> We could use the current SRA pass in a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114744
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever
git commit g:9c7cf5d71f071655a90a6d364369d111bafdb25a
gcc-descr r14--g9c7cf5d71f0716
power9 BE
Linux 6.7.9-powerpc64 ppc64
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 17 00:20:57 UTC 2024
Hi,
I would like to ping this patch.
Jeff (Jiufu Guo)
Jiufu Guo writes:
> Hi,
>
> Same like PR101168, this patch is need for s390 to
> avoid peeking eof after vector keyword.
> And similar test case is also ok for s390.
>
> Is this ok for trunk?
>
> Jeff (Jiufu Guo)
>
> PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114700
--- Comment #20 from Hu Lin ---
Created attachment 57967
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57967=edit
A new version
When I tested this patch, I met another question. g++.dg/ubsan/vla-1.C will
raise a ICE without (TREE_TYPE
git commit g:073e2c31bbd2ebe24dc8c78e6052e3c5ec90bd66
gcc-descr r12-10334-g073e2c31bbd2eb
power8
Linux 5.4.0-174-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.2.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 17 00:28:28 UTC 2024
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23872
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> With the example in PR 86698 with the patches I will be posting, gcc now
> does:
> ```
> ;; Function f (null)
> ;; enabled by -tree-original
>
>
> {
> int x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23872
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
With the example in PR 86698 with the patches I will be posting, gcc now does:
```
;; Function f (null)
;; enabled by -tree-original
{
int x = z++ , y;
DECL_EXPR;
return x;
}
```
I am still
git commit g:073e2c31bbd2ebe24dc8c78e6052e3c5ec90bd66
gcc-descr r12-10334-g073e2c31bbd2eb
power9 IEEE128
Linux 6.9.0-0.rc3.30.fc41.ppc64le ppc64le
GNU Make 4.4.1
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.3
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 17
git commit g:073e2c31bbd2ebe24dc8c78e6052e3c5ec90bd66
gcc-descr r12-10334-g073e2c31bbd2eb
power9
Linux 5.15.0-97-generic ppc64le
GNU Make 4.3
DejaGnu:
DejaGnu version 1.6.2
Expect version 5.45.4
Tcl version 8.6
64-bit
LAST_UPDATED: Wed Apr 17 00:22:03 UTC 2024
Regressions on native/master at commit r14-9998 vs commit r14-9996 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp-2.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
-fno-fat-lto-objects (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/convert-dfp.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin
1469
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-intel64-native/bld/gcc/xgcc version
14.0.1 20240416 (experimental) [native/master r14-9998-geadd05d5601] (GCC)
=== g++ tests ===
Running target sde
FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Apr 16 22:40:04 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9998-geadd05d5601)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027 (test for warnings, line 72)
XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86698
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> The semicolon comes from print_declaration So this is just a dup of bug
> 23872 in the end.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 23872 ***
outputs-23 exe savetmp named2-2: outputs.ld1_args
FAIL: outputs-24 exe savetmp named2-3: outputs.ld1_args
FAIL: outputs-25 exe savetmp named2-4: outputs.ld1_args
FAIL: outputs-294 lto sing unnamed-3: a.ld1_args
FAIL: outputs-294 lto sing unnamed-3: a.ld_args
=== gcc Summary ==
# of expected passes178405
# of unexpected failures128
# of unexpected successes 13
# of expected failures 1595
# of unsupported tests 5021
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240416
(experimental) [remote
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23872
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86698
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114748
--- Comment #5 from Arsen Arsenović ---
hm, that's odd, my local machine can also regenerate to Cristophes version also
today.. I wonder why it did not back then.. what should we do about it?
Hi all,
The driver currently will remove "/lib" and "/usr/lib" from the library path
that gets passed to the linker because it considers them as paths that the
linker will already known to search. But this is not true for newer linkers,
mold and lld for an example don't have a default search
5241
# of unsupported tests 23185
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xg++ version 14.0.1 20240416
(experimental) [master r14-9998-geadd05d560] (GCC)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O0 execution test
t/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ieee128-math.f90 -O (test for excess
errors)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes179418
# of unexpected failures97
# of unexpected successes 20
# of expected failures 1612
# of unsupported tests 4238
/home/g
of unsupported tests 4236
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240416
(experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r14-9998-geadd05d5601] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114729
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2024-04-15 00:00:00 |2024-4-16
--- Comment #9 from Vineet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114748
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114749
Bug ID: 114749
Summary: [14] RISC-V rv64gcv ICE: in vectorizable_load, at
tree-vect-stmts.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114748
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |14.0
Summary|libcpp
On Apr 15, 2024, at 8:50 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> Complete r13-2205, adjusting an arm-specific test that expects a
> no-longer-issued error at an empty initializer.
>
> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu. Also tested with gcc-13 on arm-,
> aarch64-, x86- and x86_64-vxworks7r2. Ok to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114748
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
So I went back to the gcc 9.1.0 release and aclocal there didn't change and
didn't have the include for override.m4 . I am trying to figure out where this
changed ...
can-assembler vpopctb\\t%v24,%v24
XPASS: gcc.target/s390/vxe/popcount-1.c scan-assembler vpopcth\\t%v24,%v24
=== gcc Summary for unix/-m64 ===
# of expected passes180858
# of unexpected failures173
# of unexpected successes 19
# of expected failures
On Apr 15, 2024, at 8:20 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> The test expected the address of a literal string, converted to long
> long, to yield a positive value. That expectation doesn't necessarily
> hold, and the test fails where it doesn't.
>
> Adjust the test to use a pointer that will
# of expected passes178405
# of unexpected failures128
# of unexpected successes 13
# of expected failures 1595
# of unsupported tests 5021
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240416
(experimental) [remote
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112364
Peter Damianov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter0x44 at disroot dot org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114618
--- Comment #6 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 57965
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57965=edit
Preliminary patch to fix several issues.
The attached patch is very preliminary and appears to fix the X format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114748
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
The last time aclocal.m4 had an include for override.m4 was
r9-3776-g22e052725189a4 . Are you sure you are using the correct
autoconf/automake version?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114745
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eadd05d5601063bd0c7ef6c3606b4eeb856d57d7
commit r14-9998-geadd05d5601063bd0c7ef6c3606b4eeb856d57d7
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eadd05d5601063bd0c7ef6c3606b4eeb856d57d7
commit r14-9998-geadd05d5601063bd0c7ef6c3606b4eeb856d57d7
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Tue Apr 16 23:08:43 2024 +0100
PR modula2/114745: const cast causes ICE
This patch allows SYSTEM.CAST to be used during a const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114748
Bug ID: 114748
Summary: libcpp aclocal.m4 and configure incorrectly
regenerated
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114747
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114747
Bug ID: 114747
Summary: [RISC-V RVV] Wrong SEW set for mixed-size intrinsics
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
1469
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-intel64-native/bld/gcc/xgcc version
14.0.1 20240416 (experimental) [native/master r14-9996-g48024a99e3c] (GCC)
=== g++ tests ===
Running target sde
FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Apr 16 19:40:05 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9996-g48024a99e3c)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027 (test for warnings, line 72)
XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027
t/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ieee128-math.f90 -O (test for excess
errors)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes179418
# of unexpected failures97
# of unexpected successes 20
# of expected failures 1612
# of unsupported tests 4238
/home/g
5241
# of unsupported tests 23185
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xg++ version 14.0.1 20240416
(experimental) [master r14-9997-gf438acf7ce] (GCC)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O0 execution test
of unsupported tests 4236
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240416
(experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r14-9997-gf438acf7ce2] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108383
Peter Damianov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||peter0x44 at disroot dot org
---
c++-common/gomp/atomic-9.c -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times ompexp
"__atomic_fetch_add" 1
FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/atomic-9.c -std=gnu++14 scan-tree-dump-times ompexp
"__atomic_fetch_add" 1
FAIL: c-c++-common/gomp/atomic-9.c -std=gnu++17 scan-tree-dump-times ompexp
"__atom
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 9:39 AM wrote:
>
> From: Pierre-Emmanuel Patry
>
> Hello,
>
> The rust frontend requires cargo to build some of it's components,
> it's presence was not checked during configuration.
WHY did this go in right before the release of GCC 14?
I don't get why this is considered
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 9:39 AM wrote:
>
> From: Pierre-Emmanuel Patry
>
> Hello,
>
> The rust frontend requires cargo to build some of it's components,
> it's presence was not checked during configuration.
WHY did this go in right before the release of GCC 14?
I don't get why this is considered
s8
# of expected failures 1906
# of unsupported tests 4358
/home/tcwg-buildslave/workspace/tcwg_gnu_1/abe/builds/destdir/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
version 14.0.1 20240416 (experimental) [master revision
gcc-14-9996-g48024a9
# of expected passes178405
# of unexpected failures128
# of unexpected successes 13
# of expected failures 1595
# of unsupported tests 5021
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240416
(experimental) [remote
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
the project "gcc-wwwdocs".
The branch, master has been updated
via 3530b8d820658fb3add4b06def91672a0053f2b2 (commit)
from
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f438acf7ce2e6cb862cf62f2543c36639e2af233
commit r14-9997-gf438acf7ce2e6cb862cf62f2543c36639e2af233
Author: Tamar Christina
Date: Tue Apr 16 20:56:26 2024 +0100
testsuite: Fix data check loop on vect-early-break_124-pr114403.c
The testcase had the wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114403
--- Comment #30 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f438acf7ce2e6cb862cf62f2543c36639e2af233
commit r14-9997-gf438acf7ce2e6cb862cf62f2543c36639e2af233
Author: Tamar Christina
===
# of expected passes197371
# of unexpected failures104
# of unexpected successes 27
# of expected failures 1555
# of unsupported tests 4115
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-ia32/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1
20240416 (experimental) [master r14-9993-gf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114330
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The most annoying part of this is the struct compiler is initialized by
*/lang-specs.h and it looks like I missed one and the error message is not so
obvious where the issue is.
# of unexpected failures96
# of unexpected successes 27
# of expected failures 1555
# of unsupported tests 4100
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-ia32/bld/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1
20240416 (experimental) [master-ia32 r14-9993-gf949481a1f7] (GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114739
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114741
--- Comment #6 from Tamar Christina ---
and the exact armv9-a cost model you quoted, also does the right codegen.
https://godbolt.org/z/obafoT6cj
There is just an inexplicable penalty being applied to the r->r alternative.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114741
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org,
t/powerpc/ppc-fortran/ieee128-math.f90 -O (test for excess
errors)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes179418
# of unexpected failures97
# of unexpected successes 20
# of expected failures 1612
# of unsupported tests 4238
/home/g
of unsupported tests 4236
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xgcc version 14.0.1 20240416
(experimental) [remotes/origin/HEAD r14-9996-g48024a99e3c] (GCC)
=== gfortran tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_form_io_2.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97304
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104707
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114739
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reduced testcase:
program main
implicit complex(z)
z2%re = 1.
z2%im = 2.
end
Hi!
OK to push the attached "GCN: Enable effective-target 'vect_long_long'"?
(Or is that not what you'd expect to see for GCN? I haven't checked the
actual back end code...)
Grüße
Thomas
>From d74cc9caadfe36652503782a8da172ae1975915c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113793
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Resolution|---
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Apr 12 15:09:35 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9939-ga76f236e084cbd)
=== acats tests ===
=== acats Summary ===
# of expected passes2328
# of unexpected failures0
Native configuration is riscv64-suse-linux-gnu
=== g++
1469
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-master-intel64-native/bld/gcc/xgcc version
14.0.1 20240416 (experimental) [native/master r14-9995-g443748259d9] (GCC)
=== g++ tests ===
Running target sde
FAIL: g++.target/i386/mv28.C -std=c++14 (test for errors, line 10)
FAIL: g++.
5241
# of unsupported tests 23185
/home/gccbuild/build/nightly/build-gcc-trunk/gcc/xg++ version 14.0.1 20240416
(experimental) [master r14-9996-g48024a99e3] (GCC)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix/-m32
XPASS: gcc.dg/guality/example.c -O0 execution test
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Apr 16 16:40:05 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9995-g443748259d9)
Native configuration is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027 (test for warnings, line 72)
XPASS: gcc.dg/Wstringop-overflow-47.c pr97027
LAST_UPDATED: Mon Apr 15 23:57:18 UTC 2024 (revision r14-9982-g701e1b94066)
Native configuration is powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/compat/eh/new1 cp_compat_x_tst.o-cp_compat_y_tst.o execute
XPASS: g++.dg/debug/pr46583.C -gdwarf-2 -g1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113208
--- Comment #33 from Jakub Jelinek ---
It regresses
g++.dg/coroutines/torture/co-await-16-template-traits.C
g++.dg/cpp0x/pr89403.C
g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr46228.C
g++.dg/torture/pr104601.C
g++.dg/torture/pr89303.C
g++.dg/torture/pr91606.C
on
Regressions on releases/gcc-13 at commit r13-8612 vs commit r13-8600 on
Linux/x86_64
New failures:
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-bic-bitmask-11.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects (test for
excess errors)
FAIL:
339
# of unexpected successes 69
# of expected failures 4569
# of unresolved testcases 17
# of unsupported tests 8956
/export/gnu/import/git/gcc-test-release-1-intel64/bld/gcc/xgcc version 13.2.1
20240416 [releases/gcc-13 r13-8612-g3cf5423c557] (GCC)
==
Office Hours for the GNU Toolchain on 2024-04-25 at 11am EST5EDT.
Agenda:
* https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/OfficeHours#Next
Meeting Link:
* https://bbb.linuxfoundation.org/room/adm-xcb-for-sk6
--
Cheers,
Carlos.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114745
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 57964
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57964=edit
Proposed fix
Here is a proposed patch and the example test run:
$ gm2 -fiso -c -I. -I../ Dictionary.mod -fsources
1 - 100 of 318 matches
Mail list logo
