On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 1:17 PM Ghorban M. Tavakoly via Gcc
wrote:
>
> >> Is there any change to have some LTO progress indicator information in
> upstream GCC output? Do I need to report a bug?
> Is there any chance ... (sorry for typo)
You can add -Q to the command line which makes GCC output s
Listening to Nathan Sidwell's 2022 talk on Diversity and Inclusion, he
mentioned we (GCC) should have a small statement about Diversity and
Inclusion (I think equality should be mentioned too). I agree and I
noticed there was no movement on this front and has been no mention of
it since either.
Ma
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 11:53 AM Jason Merrill via Gcc wrote:
>
> We moved to a bootstrap requirement of C++11 in GCC 11, 8 years after
> support was stable in GCC 4.8.
>
> It is now 8 years since C++14 was the default mode in GCC 6 (and 9 years
> since support was complete in GCC 5); perhaps it's
Snapshot gcc-14-20240914 is now available on
https://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/14-20240914/
and on various mirrors, see https://gcc.gnu.org/mirrors.html for details.
This snapshot has been generated from the GCC 14 git branch
with the following options: git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git branch
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024, 11:37 AM Andrew Pinski via Gcc
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 8:53 AM Jason Merrill via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > We moved to a bootstrap requirement of C++11 in GCC 11, 8 years after
> > support was stable in GCC 4.8.
> >
> > It is now 8 years since C++14 was the default mode
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 8:53 AM Jason Merrill via Gcc wrote:
>
> We moved to a bootstrap requirement of C++11 in GCC 11, 8 years after
> support was stable in GCC 4.8.
>
> It is now 8 years since C++14 was the default mode in GCC 6 (and 9 years
> since support was complete in GCC 5); perhaps it's
We moved to a bootstrap requirement of C++11 in GCC 11, 8 years after
support was stable in GCC 4.8.
It is now 8 years since C++14 was the default mode in GCC 6 (and 9 years
since support was complete in GCC 5); perhaps it's time to update?
IIRC I've previously suggested this in response to a cou
>> Is there any change to have some LTO progress indicator information in
upstream GCC output? Do I need to report a bug?
Is there any chance ... (sorry for typo)
On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 2:41 PM Ghorban M. Tavakoly
wrote:
> I build GCC from git repo regularly. Unfortunately my system is old and
I build GCC from git repo regularly. Unfortunately my system is old and a
full GCC build takes about 30 hours. I learnt that the maximum build time
spent is in LTO. I wrote a simple shell script to check LTO progress:
#!/bin/sh
AWKP='
BEGIN { RS=" " ; w = COLS - 19 }
END { progressbar(current, to
